The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
Waterford Residence Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D9 ≫ Waterford Residence ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 103 |
| Number of unprofitable | 11 |
| Highest Profit | $1,110,000 |
| Longest Held | 18 years |
| Highest Annualized | 110.32% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 114 | 13 Oct 2025 | $738k | 10.8 | 3.11% | #02-06 | 1,195 | $2,200 | $2.628m |
| 113 | 25 Sep 2025 | $550k | 12.3 | 1.79% | #07-01 | 1,421 | $1,971 | $2.800m |
| 112 | 10 Sep 2025 | $500k | 5.6 | 4.73% | #04-07 | 980 | $2,226 | $2.180m |
| 111 | 6 Jun 2025 | $785k | 12.5 | 2.42% | #01-01 | 1,475 | $2,058 | $3.035m |
| 110 | 5 Jun 2025 | $952k | 18 | 2.56% | #04-12 | 1,195 | $2,176 | $2.600m |
| 109 | 14 Jan 2025 | $635k | 13.8 | 2.25% | #04-06 | 1,195 | $2,009 | $2.400m |
| 108 | 14 Jan 2025 | $539k | 11.8 | 2.24% | #04-02 | 1,055 | $2,217 | $2.339m |
| 107 | 3 Jan 2025 | $710k | 10.9 | 2.98% | #05-09 | 1,399 | $1,858 | $2.600m |
| 106 | 29 Oct 2024 | $1,078k | 17.6 | 2.24% | #10-03 | 1,819 | $1,842 | $3.350m |
| 105 | 20 Sep 2023 | $700k | 11.2 | 2.85% | #07-05 | 1,389 | $1,872 | $2.600m |
| 104 | 23 Aug 2023 | $330k | 9.1 | 1.65% | #01-12 | 1,399 | $1,701 | $2.380m |
| 103 | 5 Sep 2022 | $444k | 11.1 | 2.18% | #06-02 | 1,055 | $1,981 | $2.090m |
| 102 | 11 Aug 2022 | $1,110k | 11.9 | 4.48% | #04-01 | 1,421 | $1,921 | $2.730m |
| 101 | 23 Jun 2022 | $525k | 9.6 | 2.29% | #02-01 | 1,421 | $1,886 | $2.680m |
| 100 | 23 May 2022 | $650k | 10 | 2.72% | #08-01 | 1,421 | $1,935 | $2.750m |
| 99 | 23 May 2022 | $819k | 15.1 | 2.95% | #03-03 | 1,195 | $1,925 | $2.300m |
| 98 | 18 Apr 2022 | $614k | 14.9 | 2.48% | #08-11 | 1,044 | $1,924 | $2.009m |
| 97 | 24 Mar 2022 | $350k | 10.6 | 1.78% | #09-02 | 1,055 | $1,943 | $2.050m |
| 96 | 15 Feb 2022 | $310k | 8.8 | 1.67% | #07-03 | 1,195 | $1,925 | $2.300m |
| 95 | 8 Feb 2022 | $350k | 3.9 | 3.58% | #10-07 | 1,647 | $1,639 | $2.700m |
| 94 | 11 Nov 2021 | $778k | 14.7 | 1.95% | #10-12 | 1,819 | $1,732 | $3.150m |
| 93 | 5 Oct 2021 | $60k | 11.1 | 0.33% | #01-08 | 1,076 | $1,542 | $1.660m |
| 92 | 30 Jul 2021 | $563k | 14.3 | 2.05% | #07-12 | 1,195 | $1,866 | $2.230m |
| 91 | 6 Jul 2021 | $158k | 8.4 | 0.92% | #04-03 | 1,195 | $1,781 | $2.128m |
| 90 | 16 Feb 2021 | $316k | 9.9 | 1.94% | #07-11 | 1,044 | $1,753 | $1.830m |
| 89 | 29 Jan 2021 | $280k | 13.7 | 0.92% | #10-11 | 1,744 | $1,365 | $2.380m |
| 88 | 8 Sep 2020 | $165k | 8.8 | 1.12% | #07-08 | 1,044 | $1,700 | $1.775m |
| 87 | 11 Aug 2020 | $397k | 13.4 | 1.57% | #03-05 | 1,389 | $1,512 | $2.100m |
| 86 | 20 Jan 2020 | -$30k | 6.7 | -0.26% | #04-07 | 980 | $1,715 | $1.680m |
| 85 | 22 Jul 2019 | $383k | 8.9 | 2.32% | #09-12 | 1,195 | $1,731 | $2.068m |
| 84 | 8 Mar 2019 | $545k | 12 | 2.55% | #08-03 | 1,195 | $1,758 | $2.100m |
| 83 | 26 Nov 2018 | $471k | 11.5 | 2.41% | #05-06 | 1,195 | $1,647 | $1.968m |
| 82 | 28 Sep 2018 | $148k | 5.5 | 1.03% | #10-02 | 1,701 | $1,588 | $2.700m |
| 81 | 8 Aug 2018 | $110k | 7.2 | 0.99% | #04-04 | 1,023 | $1,565 | $1.600m |
| 80 | 13 Jun 2018 | -$41k | 7.6 | -0.2% | #10-06 | 1,819 | $1,467 | $2.669m |
| 79 | 27 Feb 2018 | $210k | 6 | 1.57% | #10-07 | 1,647 | $1,427 | $2.350m |
| 78 | 14 Dec 2017 | $437k | 10.8 | 1.98% | #01-09 | 1,453 | $1,583 | $2.300m |
| 77 | 29 Nov 2017 | $120k | 5.1 | 1.1% | #05-01 | 1,421 | $1,548 | $2.200m |
| 76 | 27 Nov 2017 | $312k | 10.8 | 1.51% | #04-09 | 1,399 | $1,501 | $2.100m |
| 75 | 10 Oct 2017 | $513k | 10.5 | 2.52% | #02-05 | 1,389 | $1,599 | $2.220m |
| 74 | 9 Jun 2017 | $112k | 6 | 1.97% | #02-13 | 517 | $1,974 | $1.020m |
| 73 | 1 Jun 2017 | $310k | 7.3 | 2.45% | #07-06 | 1,195 | $1,599 | $1.910m |
| 72 | 25 May 2017 | $196k | 10.2 | 1.09% | #08-12 | 1,195 | $1,565 | $1.870m |
| 71 | 19 May 2017 | $135k | 7 | 1.24% | #05-08 | 1,044 | $1,566 | $1.635m |
| 70 | 30 Mar 2017 | -$20k | 4.4 | -0.28% | #06-04 | 1,023 | $1,535 | $1.570m |
| 69 | 17 Mar 2017 | $238k | 9.9 | 1.38% | #06-12 | 1,195 | $1,573 | $1.880m |
| 68 | 13 Mar 2017 | $640k | 6.5 | 6.55% | #06-06 | 1,195 | $1,578 | $1.885m |
| 67 | 14 Oct 2016 | $130k | 5.2 | 1.71% | #02-04 | 1,023 | $1,516 | $1.550m |
| 66 | 8 Jul 2016 | -$40k | 4 | -0.61% | #06-07 | 980 | $1,633 | $1.600m |
| 65 | 31 May 2016 | $406k | 9 | 2.74% | #02-03 | 1,195 | $1,569 | $1.875m |
| 64 | 18 Jan 2016 | -$16k | 5 | -0.2% | #04-08 | 1,044 | $1,485 | $1.550m |
| 63 | 21 Oct 2015 | $98k | 4.5 | 1.18% | #06-03 | 1,195 | $1,582 | $1.890m |
| 62 | 8 Sep 2015 | $239k | 8.3 | 1.9% | #02-02 | 1,055 | $1,564 | $1.650m |
| 61 | 9 Jan 2015 | $404k | 7.6 | 3.21% | #02-06 | 1,195 | $1,582 | $1.890m |
| 60 | 9 Jul 2014 | $310k | 4.3 | 3.93% | #01-12 | 1,399 | $1,465 | $2.050m |
| 59 | 23 Jun 2014 | $178k | 7.1 | 1.3% | #04-10 | 1,399 | $1,462 | $2.046m |
| 58 | 12 May 2014 | $364k | 7.2 | 2.3% | #09-01 | 1,421 | $1,689 | $2.400m |
| 57 | 27 Feb 2014 | -$10k | 6.2 | -0.09% | #05-09 | 1,399 | $1,351 | $1.890m |
| 56 | 21 Oct 2013 | $260k | 6.4 | 2.58% | #01-02 | 1,087 | $1,591 | $1.730m |
| 55 | 12 Jun 2013 | $30k | 2.2 | 0.84% | #09-11 | 1,044 | $1,561 | $1.630m |
| 54 | 22 May 2013 | $241k | 6 | 2.32% | #03-12 | 1,195 | $1,578 | $1.885m |
| 53 | 10 May 2013 | $377k | 3.6 | 5.92% | #07-03 | 1,195 | $1,666 | $1.990m |
| 52 | 9 May 2013 | $482k | 6.1 | 5.6% | #04-07 | 980 | $1,746 | $1.710m |
| 51 | 28 Jan 2013 | $220k | 2.1 | 5.79% | #04-03 | 1,195 | $1,649 | $1.970m |
| 50 | 28 Nov 2012 | $298k | 5.5 | 2.63% | #01-01 | 1,475 | $1,526 | $2.250m |
| 49 | 6 Nov 2012 | $251k | 5.4 | 2.32% | #02-01 | 1,421 | $1,517 | $2.155m |
| 48 | 22 Oct 2012 | $267k | 5.5 | 3.43% | #06-04 | 1,023 | $1,555 | $1.590m |
| 47 | 11 Oct 2012 | $163k | 5.6 | 1.46% | #05-01 | 1,421 | $1,464 | $2.080m |
| 46 | 11 Oct 2012 | $385k | 5.7 | 4.98% | #03-07 | 980 | $1,633 | $1.600m |
| 45 | 3 Oct 2012 | $445k | 5.6 | 5.65% | #05-07 | 980 | $1,715 | $1.680m |
| 44 | 26 Sep 2012 | $168k | 5.2 | 2.13% | #02-11 | 1,044 | $1,561 | $1.630m |
| 43 | 21 Sep 2012 | $90k | 5.4 | 0.89% | #03-10 | 1,399 | $1,383 | $1.935m |
| 42 | 5 Jul 2012 | $180k | 2 | 6.02% | #06-07 | 980 | $1,674 | $1.640m |
| 41 | 11 May 2012 | $94k | 5.2 | 0.88% | #08-01 | 1,421 | $1,478 | $2.100m |
| 40 | 30 Mar 2012 | $90k | 4.9 | 1.17% | #08-06 | 1,195 | $1,356 | $1.620m |
| 39 | 5 Mar 2012 | $163k | 4.9 | 2.41% | #08-07 | 980 | $1,501 | $1.470m |
| 38 | 28 Feb 2012 | $124k | 4.8 | 1.25% | #10-07 | 1,647 | $1,299 | $2.140m |
| 37 | 7 Dec 2011 | $222k | 1.6 | 9.46% | #07-08 | 1,044 | $1,542 | $1.610m |
| 36 | 15 Aug 2011 | $104k | 4.2 | 1.84% | #02-04 | 1,023 | $1,389 | $1.420m |
| 35 | 17 Jun 2011 | $196k | 1.8 | 14.06% | #02-13 | 517 | $1,756 | $0.908m |
| 34 | 25 May 2011 | $175k | 4 | 3.19% | #04-04 | 1,023 | $1,457 | $1.490m |
| 33 | 21 Apr 2011 | $108k | 3.9 | 1.61% | #06-03 | 1,195 | $1,500 | $1.793m |
| 32 | 1 Apr 2011 | $59k | 1 | 4.03% | #07-11 | 1,044 | $1,450 | $1.514m |
| 31 | 25 Mar 2011 | $167k | 3.7 | 3.04% | #09-11 | 1,044 | $1,532 | $1.600m |
| 30 | 14 Mar 2011 | $18k | 4 | 0.27% | #02-12 | 1,195 | $1,381 | $1.650m |
| 29 | 11 Mar 2011 | $265k | 3.8 | 4.41% | #04-06 | 1,195 | $1,477 | $1.765m |
| 28 | 11 Feb 2011 | $129k | 4 | 1.73% | #05-10 | 1,399 | $1,401 | $1.960m |
| 27 | 31 Dec 2010 | $248k | 1 | 18.65% | #04-08 | 1,044 | $1,500 | $1.566m |
| 26 | 20 Dec 2010 | $255k | 3.6 | 4.48% | #04-03 | 1,195 | $1,465 | $1.750m |
| 25 | 16 Nov 2010 | $151k | 3.4 | 3.04% | #08-08 | 1,044 | $1,513 | $1.580m |
| 24 | 15 Nov 2010 | $571k | 3.6 | 6.8% | #10-06 | 1,819 | $1,490 | $2.710m |
| 23 | 13 Sep 2010 | -$258k | 3.4 | -4.02% | #10-04 | 1,636 | $1,045 | $1.710m |
| 22 | 13 Sep 2010 | -$252k | 3.4 | -4.13% | #04-01 | 1,421 | $1,140 | $1.620m |
| 21 | 13 Sep 2010 | -$171k | 3.4 | -4.01% | #05-04 | 1,023 | $1,110 | $1.135m |
| 20 | 30 Aug 2010 | -$255k | 3.3 | -5.51% | #06-06 | 1,195 | $1,042 | $1.245m |
| 19 | 26 Aug 2010 | $169k | 3.5 | 2.64% | #02-09 | 1,399 | $1,388 | $1.942m |
| 18 | 23 Aug 2010 | -$66k | 3.4 | -1.13% | #09-12 | 1,195 | $1,410 | $1.685m |
| 17 | 13 Aug 2010 | $67k | 0.2 | 19.31% | #03-06 | 1,195 | $1,406 | $1.680m |
| 16 | 9 Jul 2010 | $193k | 3.3 | 4.36% | #06-07 | 980 | $1,491 | $1.460m |
| 15 | 21 May 2010 | $113k | 3 | 2.49% | #03-06 | 1,195 | $1,350 | $1.613m |
| 14 | 17 May 2010 | $170k | 3 | 4.12% | #05-08 | 1,044 | $1,437 | $1.500m |
| 13 | 5 May 2010 | $104k | 3 | 2.2% | #09-06 | 1,195 | $1,368 | $1.634m |
| 12 | 3 May 2010 | $40k | 3.2 | 0.82% | #08-02 | 1,055 | $1,470 | $1.551m |
| 11 | 16 Apr 2010 | $27k | 2.9 | 0.66% | #07-08 | 1,044 | $1,329 | $1.388m |
| 10 | 7 Apr 2010 | $77k | 2.8 | 1.6% | #01-12 | 1,399 | $1,243 | $1.740m |
| 9 | 31 Mar 2010 | $94k | 2.8 | 2.41% | #07-11 | 1,044 | $1,394 | $1.455m |
| 8 | 8 Feb 2010 | $64k | 2.7 | 1.54% | #07-06 | 1,195 | $1,339 | $1.600m |
| 7 | 17 Sep 2009 | $93k | 2.4 | 2.47% | #07-03 | 1,195 | $1,350 | $1.613m |
| 6 | 13 Aug 2009 | $35k | 2.4 | 2.09% | #02-13 | 517 | $1,378 | $0.712m |
| 5 | 7 Aug 2009 | $192k | 2.2 | 4.08% | #10-08 | 1,744 | $1,291 | $2.252m |
| 4 | 31 Dec 2007 | $44k | 0.8 | 2.78% | #05-09 | 1,399 | $1,358 | $1.900m |
| 3 | 27 Jul 2007 | $128k | 0.1 | 96.35% | #02-11 | 1,044 | $1,400 | $1.462m |
| 2 | 6 Jul 2007 | $74k | 0.4 | 15.96% | #08-08 | 1,044 | $1,369 | $1.429m |
| 1 | 8 Jun 2007 | $192k | 0.2 | 110.32% | #06-03 | 1,195 | $1,410 | $1.685m |