The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
Vista Park Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D5 ≫ Vista Park ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 107 |
| Number of unprofitable | 35 |
| Highest Profit | $1,000,000 |
| Longest Held | 21.7 years |
| Highest Annualized | 999% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 142 | 26 Sep 2017 | $315k | 21.2 | 2.2% | #04-05 | 893 | $951 | $0.850m |
| 141 | 7 Sep 2017 | $20k | 5.2 | 0.58% | #03-08 | 732 | $936 | $0.685m |
| 140 | 16 Aug 2017 | $105k | 5.3 | 3.2% | #01-02 | 646 | $1,053 | $0.680m |
| 139 | 11 Aug 2017 | $28k | 5.3 | 0.78% | #03-01 | 753 | $913 | $0.688m |
| 138 | 21 Jul 2017 | $606k | 12.5 | 9.24% | #04-05 | 1,076 | $842 | $0.906m |
| 137 | 20 Jun 2017 | $230k | 20.5 | 1.97% | #01-11 | 797 | $879 | $0.700m |
| 136 | 25 May 2017 | -$20k | 4.9 | -0.66% | #03-06 | 710 | $859 | $0.610m |
| 135 | 22 May 2017 | $313k | 21.7 | 2.15% | #01-12 | 990 | $856 | $0.848m |
| 134 | 5 May 2017 | $400k | 18.1 | 4.22% | #03-09 | 904 | $841 | $0.760m |
| 133 | 25 Apr 2017 | $237k | 21.2 | 1.67% | #04-01 | 958 | $835 | $0.800m |
| 132 | 2 Sep 2016 | $117k | 6.6 | 2.42% | #01-01 | 990 | $805 | $0.797m |
| 131 | 8 Jul 2016 | $417k | 10.8 | 8.34% | #03-08 | 947 | $760 | $0.720m |
| 130 | 5 Jul 2016 | $442k | 13 | 6.67% | #01-01 | 969 | $805 | $0.780m |
| 129 | 13 May 2016 | $475k | 15.3 | 5.38% | #02-10 | 990 | $868 | $0.860m |
| 128 | 10 May 2016 | $190k | 6.4 | 4.06% | #01-04 | 1,001 | $839 | $0.840m |
| 127 | 4 Mar 2016 | $565k | 11.9 | 8.66% | #03-13 | 947 | $950 | $0.900m |
| 126 | 14 Jan 2016 | $472k | 6.3 | 4.64% | #01-08 | 2,433 | $781 | $1.900m |
| 125 | 23 Sep 2015 | $422k | 12 | 8.34% | #01-08 | 732 | $936 | $0.685m |
| 124 | 30 Jun 2015 | $164k | 5.7 | 3.73% | #03-06 | 1,001 | $863 | $0.864m |
| 123 | 15 Jun 2015 | $85k | 4.9 | 2.19% | #02-01 | 958 | $887 | $0.850m |
| 122 | 13 May 2015 | $515k | 13.6 | 7.28% | #04-08 | 947 | $882 | $0.835m |
| 121 | 3 Nov 2014 | $219k | 5.1 | 7.58% | #04-09 | 689 | $1,016 | $0.700m |
| 120 | 21 Oct 2014 | $648k | 13.3 | 6.92% | #03-05 | 1,216 | $904 | $1.100m |
| 119 | 15 Oct 2014 | $1,000k | 7.8 | 10.03% | #01-09 | 2,573 | $739 | $1.900m |
| 118 | 29 May 2014 | $490k | 10.7 | 8.88% | #03-05 | 926 | $886 | $0.820m |
| 117 | 12 May 2014 | $200k | 6.3 | 2.01% | #01-06 | 2,519 | $675 | $1.700m |
| 116 | 27 Mar 2014 | $290k | 4.2 | 8.85% | #03-01 | 1,001 | $959 | $0.960m |
| 115 | 5 Nov 2013 | $490k | 16.9 | 3.02% | #02-02 | 1,302 | $952 | $1.240m |
| 114 | 16 Aug 2013 | $450k | 4.2 | 15.39% | #01-08 | 947 | $1,043 | $0.988m |
| 113 | 3 Jul 2013 | $310k | 17.1 | 2.53% | #03-01 | 980 | $909 | $0.890m |
| 112 | 1 Jul 2013 | $565k | 11.9 | 9.04% | #01-02 | 904 | $973 | $0.880m |
| 111 | 3 May 2013 | $592k | 7.8 | 14.78% | #02-01 | 980 | $919 | $0.900m |
| 110 | 26 Apr 2013 | $679k | 8 | 17.05% | #01-03 | 947 | $1,000 | $0.947m |
| 109 | 19 Apr 2013 | $237k | 3.7 | 9.13% | #03-05 | 926 | $929 | $0.860m |
| 108 | 14 Mar 2013 | $310k | 18 | 2.59% | #01-12 | 926 | $907 | $0.840m |
| 107 | 14 Mar 2013 | $280k | 3.7 | 13.9% | #04-12 | 689 | $1,071 | $0.738m |
| 106 | 11 Mar 2013 | $690k | 12.4 | 7.17% | #02-04 | 1,302 | $921 | $1.200m |
| 105 | 8 Mar 2013 | $485k | 6.9 | 16.28% | #02-06 | 753 | $995 | $0.750m |
| 104 | 30 Jan 2013 | $727k | 7.8 | 16.32% | #04-03 | 1,076 | $975 | $1.049m |
| 103 | 25 Jan 2013 | $492k | 6.2 | 14.68% | #03-10 | 936 | $918 | $0.860m |
| 102 | 23 Jan 2013 | $550k | 11.4 | 7.96% | #04-13 | 926 | $1,021 | $0.945m |
| 101 | 10 Jan 2013 | $400k | 3.9 | 15.15% | #03-03 | 926 | $1,026 | $0.950m |
| 100 | 4 Dec 2012 | $529k | 7.3 | 14.62% | #04-11 | 915 | $916 | $0.838m |
| 99 | 23 Oct 2012 | $550k | 5.9 | 17.42% | #01-06 | 936 | $961 | $0.900m |
| 98 | 3 Oct 2012 | $290k | 12.9 | 3.55% | #03-02 | 904 | $885 | $0.800m |
| 97 | 28 Sep 2012 | $488k | 12 | 7.38% | #04-03 | 926 | $918 | $0.850m |
| 96 | 21 Aug 2012 | $690k | 10 | 11.95% | #04-06 | 1,066 | $957 | $1.020m |
| 95 | 15 Aug 2012 | $170k | 17.5 | 1.64% | #01-07 | 926 | $743 | $0.688m |
| 94 | 10 Jul 2012 | $212k | 3 | 13.65% | #03-08 | 732 | $909 | $0.665m |
| 93 | 5 Jul 2012 | $155k | 16.8 | 1.69% | #03-06 | 710 | $887 | $0.630m |
| 92 | 4 Jul 2012 | $200k | 17.2 | 2.14% | #03-07 | 710 | $922 | $0.655m |
| 91 | 3 Jul 2012 | $188k | 16.5 | 2.08% | #01-05 | 710 | $922 | $0.655m |
| 90 | 29 Jun 2012 | $450k | 13 | 5.87% | #03-07 | 1,001 | $859 | $0.860m |
| 89 | 19 Jun 2012 | $530k | 7.6 | 14.65% | #01-04 | 926 | $886 | $0.820m |
| 88 | 18 Jun 2012 | $217k | 2.6 | 11.14% | #02-01 | 1,001 | $896 | $0.897m |
| 87 | 13 Jun 2012 | $440k | 8.2 | 13.92% | #04-05 | 710 | $943 | $0.670m |
| 86 | 16 May 2012 | $172k | 2.5 | 12.17% | #02-04 | 775 | $903 | $0.700m |
| 85 | 20 Apr 2012 | $450k | 8.7 | 9.98% | #04-04 | 883 | $906 | $0.800m |
| 84 | 20 Apr 2012 | $175k | 14.6 | 2.52% | #01-02 | 646 | $890 | $0.575m |
| 83 | 9 Apr 2012 | $290k | 11.6 | 5.11% | #03-01 | 753 | $876 | $0.660m |
| 82 | 4 Apr 2012 | $455k | 12.7 | 6.38% | #02-03 | 958 | $872 | $0.835m |
| 81 | 1 Jun 2011 | $400k | 6.2 | 14.76% | #04-09 | 883 | $793 | $0.700m |
| 80 | 14 Mar 2011 | $160k | 1.6 | 15.8% | #03-07 | 904 | $829 | $0.750m |
| 79 | 7 Feb 2011 | $455k | 9.7 | 8.74% | #02-08 | 947 | $866 | $0.820m |
| 78 | 12 Aug 2010 | $165k | 2 | 12.39% | #02-12 | 1,001 | $774 | $0.775m |
| 77 | 3 Aug 2010 | $225k | 14.4 | 2.44% | #02-01 | 958 | $799 | $0.765m |
| 76 | 8 Jul 2010 | $372k | 7 | 11.3% | #01-08 | 958 | $739 | $0.708m |
| 75 | 5 Feb 2010 | $178k | 10.4 | 3.43% | #04-01 | 840 | $715 | $0.600m |
| 74 | 15 Jan 2010 | $70k | 13.3 | 0.82% | #01-01 | 990 | $687 | $0.680m |
| 73 | 5 Jan 2010 | $511k | 5.4 | 18.43% | #01-03 | 1,216 | $700 | $0.851m |
| 72 | 30 Dec 2009 | $90k | 13.6 | 1.06% | #03-01 | 1,001 | $669 | $0.670m |
| 71 | 1 Dec 2009 | $225k | 10.4 | 4.17% | #01-04 | 1,001 | $649 | $0.650m |
| 70 | 9 Nov 2009 | $130k | 12.6 | 1.78% | #01-05 | 958 | $679 | $0.650m |
| 69 | 4 Nov 2009 | $130k | 13.6 | 1.57% | #02-01 | 1,001 | $679 | $0.680m |
| 68 | 2 Oct 2009 | $165k | 14.3 | 1.9% | #03-06 | 1,001 | $699 | $0.700m |
| 67 | 16 Sep 2009 | $231k | 4.5 | 15.52% | #04-09 | 689 | $698 | $0.481m |
| 66 | 11 Aug 2009 | $63k | 13.5 | 0.79% | #03-05 | 926 | $673 | $0.623m |
| 65 | 23 Jul 2009 | $150k | 9.9 | 3.02% | #03-07 | 904 | $653 | $0.590m |
| 64 | 15 Jul 2009 | $640k | 3 | 22.47% | #01-02 | 2,519 | $556 | $1.400m |
| 63 | 14 Jul 2009 | $7k | 14.2 | 0.11% | #04-12 | 689 | $665 | $0.458m |
| 62 | 22 Jun 2009 | -$2k | 12.4 | -0.03% | #02-11 | 797 | $615 | $0.490m |
| 61 | 18 May 2009 | $198k | 5.4 | 8.85% | #01-08 | 947 | $568 | $0.538m |
| 60 | 26 Feb 2009 | $204k | 7.4 | 6.43% | #03-03 | 926 | $594 | $0.550m |
| 59 | 30 Dec 2008 | $165k | 7.8 | 4.9% | #02-09 | 958 | $553 | $0.530m |
| 58 | 3 Oct 2008 | $40k | 12.7 | 0.68% | #04-10 | 775 | $633 | $0.490m |
| 57 | 25 Jul 2008 | $250k | 6.6 | 8.28% | #02-12 | 1,001 | $609 | $0.610m |
| 56 | 20 May 2008 | $530k | 1.2 | 32.96% | #01-01 | 2,626 | $678 | $1.780m |
| 55 | 5 May 2008 | $720k | 1.2 | 59.12% | #01-06 | 2,540 | $669 | $1.700m |
| 54 | 24 Jan 2008 | $815k | 1.8 | 53.05% | #01-06 | 2,519 | $596 | $1.500m |
| 53 | 7 Jan 2008 | $730k | 1.3 | 58.44% | #01-05 | 2,497 | $641 | $1.600m |
| 52 | 17 Aug 2007 | $230k | 0.4 | 202.12% | #01-03 | 990 | $702 | $0.695m |
| 51 | 12 Jun 2007 | $140k | 0.1 | 999% | #04-02 | 915 | $656 | $0.600m |
| 50 | 15 May 2007 | $132k | 0.7 | 62.79% | #04-02 | 915 | $503 | $0.460m |
| 49 | 4 May 2007 | $130k | 0.2 | 844.52% | #04-06 | 807 | $557 | $0.450m |
| 48 | 17 Apr 2007 | $193k | 4.9 | 8.46% | #03-01 | 1,206 | $485 | $0.585m |
| 47 | 12 Mar 2007 | $45k | 3.8 | 3.74% | #01-10 | 958 | $365 | $0.350m |
| 46 | 21 Dec 2006 | $345k | 3.8 | 13.43% | #01-09 | 2,573 | $350 | $0.900m |
| 45 | 5 Dec 2006 | $45k | 3.7 | 3.78% | #01-06 | 936 | $374 | $0.350m |
| 44 | 14 Nov 2006 | $80k | 1.4 | 19.83% | #03-10 | 936 | $393 | $0.368m |
| 43 | 18 Oct 2006 | -$110k | 6.7 | -4.97% | #02-09 | 689 | $392 | $0.270m |
| 42 | 11 Sep 2006 | $35k | 7.3 | 0.57% | #01-05 | 2,497 | $348 | $0.870m |
| 41 | 7 Aug 2006 | -$90k | 8.1 | -2.84% | #02-05 | 926 | $367 | $0.340m |
| 40 | 10 Jul 2006 | $185k | 1.4 | 22.06% | #01-02 | 2,519 | $302 | $0.760m |
| 39 | 8 May 2006 | -$18k | 1.7 | -3.2% | #02-11 | 936 | $331 | $0.310m |
| 38 | 13 Apr 2006 | $35k | 2.8 | 5.23% | #02-06 | 753 | $352 | $0.265m |
| 37 | 10 Apr 2006 | $15k | 3.2 | 2.15% | #03-12 | 603 | $382 | $0.230m |
| 36 | 12 Aug 2005 | $24k | 3.1 | 2.67% | #04-11 | 915 | $338 | $0.309m |
| 35 | 22 Jul 2005 | -$24k | 3.4 | -2.16% | #02-01 | 980 | $314 | $0.308m |
| 34 | 6 Jul 2005 | -$227k | 9.6 | -5.86% | #03-10 | 936 | $308 | $0.288m |
| 33 | 27 Apr 2005 | -$242k | 9 | -6.63% | #04-02 | 883 | $321 | $0.283m |
| 32 | 12 Apr 2005 | -$210k | 9.5 | -5.56% | #02-09 | 904 | $321 | $0.290m |
| 31 | 7 Apr 2005 | -$325k | 7.9 | -9.74% | #01-01 | 990 | $263 | $0.260m |
| 30 | 3 Mar 2005 | -$180k | 9.7 | -5.45% | #04-09 | 689 | $363 | $0.250m |
| 29 | 12 Nov 2004 | -$210k | 9.8 | -5.42% | #01-04 | 926 | $313 | $0.290m |
| 28 | 8 Oct 2004 | -$225k | 8.5 | -6.36% | #01-05 | 936 | $320 | $0.300m |
| 27 | 12 Aug 2004 | -$222k | 7.7 | -6.46% | #02-11 | 936 | $350 | $0.328m |
| 26 | 31 Mar 2004 | -$248k | 7.9 | -8.9% | #04-05 | 710 | $324 | $0.230m |
| 25 | 24 Mar 2004 | -$195k | 6.9 | -8.02% | #03-10 | 732 | $342 | $0.250m |
| 24 | 14 Oct 2003 | -$193k | 8.3 | -5.54% | #02-04 | 904 | $354 | $0.320m |
| 23 | 22 Jul 2003 | -$117k | 4 | -7.11% | #01-01 | 969 | $349 | $0.338m |
| 22 | 3 Jul 2003 | -$250k | 7.2 | -9.65% | #02-06 | 753 | $305 | $0.230m |
| 21 | 11 Jun 2003 | -$25k | 1.3 | -6.06% | #01-10 | 958 | $318 | $0.305m |
| 20 | 20 Mar 2003 | -$250k | 7.6 | -7.54% | #01-06 | 936 | $326 | $0.305m |
| 19 | 7 Feb 2003 | -$78k | 2.7 | -11.01% | #03-12 | 603 | $357 | $0.215m |
| 18 | 24 Jan 2003 | -$42k | 3.7 | -2.79% | #01-07 | 1,066 | $355 | $0.378m |
| 17 | 22 Aug 2002 | -$260k | 7.4 | -7.56% | #04-06 | 1,066 | $310 | $0.330m |
| 16 | 20 Sep 2001 | -$225k | 5.5 | -9.29% | #04-08 | 947 | $338 | $0.320m |
| 15 | 17 Jul 2001 | -$27k | 2.2 | -3.34% | #04-06 | 893 | $382 | $0.341m |
| 14 | 1 Jan 2001 | $35k | 1.8 | 5.22% | #02-06 | 926 | $438 | $0.405m |
| 13 | 1 Sep 2000 | -$208k | 4.7 | -9.05% | #01-05 | 969 | $384 | $0.372m |
| 12 | 1 Sep 2000 | -$80k | 3.5 | -5.48% | #03-01 | 753 | $491 | $0.370m |
| 11 | 10 Jul 2000 | -$140k | 4.9 | -5.95% | #03-10 | 990 | $399 | $0.395m |
| 10 | 3 Feb 2000 | -$88k | 3.7 | -5.48% | #02-09 | 689 | $552 | $0.380m |
| 9 | 5 Jul 1999 | -$105k | 4.3 | -4.96% | #01-04 | 1,001 | $425 | $0.425m |
| 8 | 1 Jun 1999 | -$303k | 1.9 | -14.74% | #01-05 | 2,497 | $334 | $0.835m |
| 7 | 7 Apr 1999 | -$140k | 4.1 | -7.7% | #03-09 | 904 | $398 | $0.360m |
| 6 | 22 Mar 1999 | -$170k | 3.3 | -10.9% | #02-06 | 926 | $400 | $0.370m |
| 5 | 9 May 1997 | $85k | 1.4 | 11.51% | #01-01 | 990 | $591 | $0.585m |
| 4 | 16 Dec 1996 | $228k | 1 | 41.64% | #02-02 | 1,302 | $576 | $0.750m |
| 3 | 3 Apr 1996 | $20k | 0.5 | 8.78% | #02-06 | 753 | $637 | $0.480m |
| 2 | 21 Nov 1995 | -$24k | 0.5 | -9.29% | #03-12 | 904 | $564 | $0.510m |
| 1 | 1 Oct 1995 | $15k | 0 | 651.39% | #02-06 | 753 | $611 | $0.460m |