The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
Tulip Garden Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D10 ≫ Tulip Garden ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 20 |
| Number of unprofitable | 10 |
| Highest Profit | $2,030,000 |
| Longest Held | 15 years |
| Highest Annualized | 999% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 27 Apr 2017 | $1,198k | 12.4 | 7.24% | #10-05 | 1,701 | $1,216 | $2.068m |
| 29 | 7 Nov 2016 | $1,350k | 15 | 4.49% | #01-03 | 2,659 | $1,053 | $2.800m |
| 28 | 6 Jan 2016 | $672k | 6.7 | 5.97% | #14-06 | 1,701 | $1,235 | $2.100m |
| 27 | 11 Aug 2015 | $2,030k | 10.4 | 8.28% | #07-03 | 3,401 | $1,058 | $3.600m |
| 26 | 18 Aug 2014 | $970k | 5.2 | 10.03% | #05-06 | 1,701 | $1,464 | $2.490m |
| 25 | 5 Sep 2012 | $712k | 4 | 9.51% | #05-03 | 1,733 | $1,356 | $2.350m |
| 24 | 15 Mar 2012 | $1,285k | 13 | 7.28% | #06-06 | 1,701 | $1,264 | $2.150m |
| 23 | 19 Nov 2009 | $1,000k | 13.1 | 2.6% | #03-03 | 3,401 | $1,029 | $3.500m |
| 22 | 12 Nov 2009 | $1,100k | 3.5 | 16.1% | #05-03 | 2,831 | $954 | $2.700m |
| 21 | 27 Aug 2009 | $1,550k | 5.4 | 18.77% | #05-01 | 2,831 | $901 | $2.550m |
| 20 | 20 May 2009 | $840k | 6.3 | 6.73% | #06-03 | 3,401 | $735 | $2.500m |
| 19 | 27 Nov 2008 | $208k | 13.2 | 0.91% | #05-03 | 2,831 | $649 | $1.838m |
| 18 | 14 Aug 2008 | $660k | 2.7 | 24.41% | #11-06 | 1,701 | $882 | $1.500m |
| 17 | 22 Jul 2008 | $359k | 1.7 | 11.1% | #05-08 | 2,831 | $759 | $2.150m |
| 16 | 1 Jun 2007 | $1,670k | 0.7 | 163.7% | #01-01 | 2,659 | $1,279 | $3.400m |
| 15 | 17 May 2007 | $930k | 10.3 | 4.67% | #01-05 | 2,659 | $933 | $2.480m |
| 14 | 10 May 2007 | $625k | 0.4 | 86.45% | #03-09 | 2,583 | $1,006 | $2.600m |
| 13 | 10 May 2006 | $400k | 0.5 | 81.54% | #05-03 | 2,831 | $565 | $1.600m |
| 12 | 28 Sep 2005 | -$300k | 8.5 | -2.33% | #03-04 | 2,583 | $523 | $1.350m |
| 11 | 18 Apr 2005 | -$343k | 10 | -2.33% | #03-06 | 2,583 | $501 | $1.295m |
| 10 | 27 Feb 2005 | -$360k | 7.6 | -3.31% | #01-08 | 2,659 | $466 | $1.240m |
| 9 | 13 Oct 2003 | -$60k | 4.4 | -1.53% | #06-02 | 1,733 | $490 | $0.850m |
| 8 | 26 Aug 2003 | -$500k | 7.7 | -4.57% | #03-04 | 2,583 | $445 | $1.150m |
| 7 | 11 Jun 2003 | -$100k | 5.3 | -1.52% | #05-04 | 2,831 | $417 | $1.180m |
| 6 | 5 Feb 2003 | -$320k | 7.9 | -2.2% | #06-03 | 3,401 | $488 | $1.660m |
| 5 | 19 Nov 2001 | $190k | 0 | 999% | #01-03 | 2,659 | $545 | $1.450m |
| 4 | 9 Apr 2001 | -$492k | 3.7 | -6.63% | #08-02 | 3,412 | $495 | $1.688m |
| 3 | 1 Feb 2000 | $50k | 4.6 | 0.74% | #05-02 | 2,831 | $533 | $1.510m |
| 2 | 1 Sep 1999 | -$237k | 4.6 | -3.13% | #03-03 | 2,583 | $586 | $1.513m |
| 1 | 1 Jul 1999 | -$20k | 3.9 | -0.47% | #05-04 | 1,701 | $647 | $1.100m |