The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
The Claymore Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D9 ≫ The Claymore ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 54 |
| Number of unprofitable | 30 |
| Highest Profit | $9,000,000 |
| Longest Held | 28.5 years |
| Highest Annualized | 129.35% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84 | 26 Mar 2025 | $6,370k | 25.5 | 3.27% | #11-02 | 3,348 | $3,399 | $11.380m |
| 83 | 17 Feb 2025 | $4,580k | 24.5 | 3.35% | #19-01 | 2,680 | $3,089 | $8.280m |
| 82 | 29 Nov 2024 | $2,300k | 17.8 | 1.95% | #21-01 | 2,680 | $2,948 | $7.900m |
| 81 | 20 Dec 2023 | $5,805k | 28.5 | 2.44% | #24-02 | 3,348 | $3,489 | $11.680m |
| 80 | 18 Aug 2022 | $1,650k | 5.4 | 4.2% | #12-01 | 2,680 | $3,097 | $8.300m |
| 79 | 31 Mar 2022 | $5,213k | 26.7 | 2.37% | #26-02 | 3,348 | $3,342 | $11.189m |
| 78 | 21 Oct 2020 | $4,850k | 21.6 | 3.85% | #15-02 | 3,348 | $2,599 | $8.700m |
| 77 | 9 Jul 2020 | $820k | 10.3 | 1.13% | #02-03 | 2,680 | $2,798 | $7.500m |
| 76 | 13 Apr 2020 | $9,000k | 18.1 | 4.26% | #25-03 | 4,919 | $3,456 | $17.000m |
| 75 | 18 Oct 2019 | $1,200k | 8.2 | 1.56% | #08-02 | 3,348 | $3,017 | $10.100m |
| 74 | 16 Sep 2019 | $2,450k | 8.7 | 2.04% | #25-01 | 4,919 | $3,090 | $15.200m |
| 73 | 14 Jun 2018 | $3,429k | 22.9 | 2.18% | #14-02 | 3,348 | $2,629 | $8.800m |
| 72 | 3 May 2018 | $4,700k | 14.2 | 5.55% | #22-02 | 3,348 | $2,629 | $8.800m |
| 71 | 11 Sep 2017 | $3,720k | 18.4 | 4.41% | #08-01 | 2,680 | $2,537 | $6.800m |
| 70 | 18 Aug 2017 | -$300k | 7.4 | -0.43% | #19-02 | 3,348 | $2,748 | $9.200m |
| 69 | 11 Jul 2017 | $2,150k | 19.6 | 1.61% | #25-02 | 3,348 | $2,390 | $8.000m |
| 68 | 25 May 2016 | $1,707k | 20.1 | 1.53% | #23-01 | 2,680 | $2,425 | $6.500m |
| 67 | 6 Jan 2016 | $2,300k | 9.1 | 4.46% | #09-01 | 2,680 | $2,612 | $7.000m |
| 66 | 16 Jun 2015 | $5,200k | 12.7 | 7.7% | #02-02 | 3,348 | $2,539 | $8.500m |
| 65 | 19 May 2014 | $3,074k | 18.6 | 2.28% | #25-02 | 3,348 | $2,689 | $9.000m |
| 64 | 10 Jul 2012 | $3,840k | 6.1 | 9.68% | #07-02 | 3,348 | $2,659 | $8.900m |
| 63 | 18 Apr 2012 | $3,885k | 16.7 | 3.46% | #07-02 | 3,348 | $2,674 | $8.950m |
| 62 | 28 Dec 2011 | $2,800k | 2.9 | 14.91% | #10-02 | 3,348 | $2,539 | $8.500m |
| 61 | 8 Aug 2011 | $3,600k | 5.3 | 10.35% | #08-02 | 3,348 | $2,659 | $8.900m |
| 60 | 6 May 2011 | $1,380k | 1.3 | 17.37% | #17-03 | 2,680 | $2,821 | $7.560m |
| 59 | 4 Jan 2011 | $7,250k | 9.7 | 9.1% | #25-01 | 4,919 | $2,592 | $12.750m |
| 58 | 22 Apr 2010 | $4,400k | 9.7 | 8.56% | #20-03 | 2,680 | $2,985 | $8.000m |
| 57 | 19 Mar 2010 | $4,900k | 9.7 | 7.75% | #19-02 | 3,348 | $2,838 | $9.500m |
| 56 | 15 Mar 2010 | $1,600k | 3.1 | 6.83% | #14-02 | 3,348 | $2,599 | $8.700m |
| 55 | 8 Mar 2010 | $4,100k | 7.3 | 13.88% | #02-03 | 2,680 | $2,492 | $6.680m |
| 54 | 16 Nov 2009 | $3,180k | 13.7 | 3.56% | #13-02 | 3,348 | $2,503 | $8.380m |
| 53 | 9 Sep 2009 | -$562k | 1.3 | -6.42% | #17-01 | 2,680 | $2,327 | $6.238m |
| 52 | 12 Aug 2009 | $564k | 12.4 | 0.99% | #11-01 | 2,680 | $1,828 | $4.900m |
| 51 | 27 Jul 2009 | $1,973k | 14 | 2.28% | #13-02 | 3,348 | $2,181 | $7.300m |
| 50 | 23 Jul 2009 | $1,162k | 14.1 | 1.59% | #24-03 | 2,680 | $2,164 | $5.800m |
| 49 | 14 Jul 2009 | $2,588k | 4.4 | 14.44% | #19-01 | 2,680 | $2,160 | $5.788m |
| 48 | 15 Jun 2009 | $512k | 2.4 | 4.12% | #03-01 | 2,680 | $2,089 | $5.600m |
| 47 | 13 Feb 2009 | $1,520k | 5 | 6.34% | #10-02 | 3,348 | $1,703 | $5.700m |
| 46 | 22 May 2008 | $4,050k | 6.1 | 16.13% | #17-01 | 2,680 | $2,537 | $6.800m |
| 45 | 16 Jul 2007 | $4,750k | 1 | 129.35% | #13-01 | 2,680 | $3,190 | $8.550m |
| 44 | 16 Feb 2007 | $3,600k | 2.4 | 34.47% | #14-02 | 3,348 | $2,121 | $7.100m |
| 43 | 31 Jan 2007 | $1,140k | 10.9 | 2.36% | #03-01 | 2,680 | $1,898 | $5.088m |
| 42 | 24 Jan 2007 | $940k | 10.8 | 1.72% | #21-01 | 2,680 | $2,089 | $5.600m |
| 41 | 26 Dec 2006 | $858k | 10.8 | 1.44% | #05-02 | 3,348 | $1,792 | $6.000m |
| 40 | 20 Nov 2006 | $717k | 11.5 | 1.45% | #09-01 | 2,680 | $1,754 | $4.700m |
| 39 | 22 Aug 2006 | $180k | 9.8 | 0.45% | #14-01 | 2,680 | $1,567 | $4.200m |
| 38 | 24 Jul 2006 | -$500k | 8.8 | -1.4% | #13-01 | 2,680 | $1,418 | $3.800m |
| 37 | 5 Jun 2006 | $216k | 11 | 0.36% | #12-02 | 3,348 | $1,643 | $5.500m |
| 36 | 4 May 2006 | $191k | 10.8 | 0.34% | #08-02 | 3,348 | $1,583 | $5.300m |
| 35 | 13 Feb 2006 | $198k | 6.8 | 0.57% | #23-02 | 3,348 | $1,559 | $5.220m |
| 34 | 5 Jan 2006 | $732k | 6.8 | 3.25% | #19-03 | 2,680 | $1,403 | $3.760m |
| 33 | 27 Oct 2005 | -$750k | 9.4 | -1.47% | #10-02 | 3,348 | $1,494 | $5.000m |
| 32 | 13 Sep 2005 | -$400k | 9.7 | -1.23% | #02-01 | 2,680 | $1,175 | $3.150m |
| 31 | 19 Aug 2005 | -$1,085k | 8.3 | -2.77% | #02-02 | 3,348 | $1,244 | $4.165m |
| 30 | 22 Feb 2005 | -$250k | 4.5 | -1.67% | #19-01 | 2,680 | $1,194 | $3.200m |
| 29 | 15 Feb 2005 | $150k | 3.6 | 1.5% | #07-01 | 2,680 | $1,082 | $2.900m |
| 28 | 4 Aug 2004 | -$700k | 3.8 | -5.16% | #14-01 | 2,680 | $1,157 | $3.100m |
| 27 | 23 Jun 2004 | -$1,846k | 7.3 | -6.44% | #19-03 | 2,680 | $1,101 | $2.950m |
| 26 | 8 Mar 2004 | $500k | 0.6 | 24.98% | #22-02 | 3,348 | $1,225 | $4.100m |
| 25 | 5 Sep 2003 | -$1,743k | 7.3 | -6.59% | #15-01 | 2,680 | $1,001 | $2.683m |
| 24 | 23 May 2003 | -$1,600k | 6.8 | -6.83% | #08-03 | 2,680 | $970 | $2.600m |
| 23 | 17 Sep 2002 | -$50k | 4.5 | -0.34% | #02-02 | 3,348 | $986 | $3.300m |
| 22 | 10 Apr 2002 | -$1,625k | 5.9 | -6.72% | #12-01 | 2,680 | $1,194 | $3.200m |
| 21 | 1 Apr 2002 | $830k | 2.7 | 9.3% | #11-02 | 3,348 | $1,159 | $3.880m |
| 20 | 23 Mar 2002 | -$534k | 6.6 | -0.97% | #25-03 | 4,919 | $1,626 | $8.000m |
| 19 | 8 Nov 2001 | $120k | 2.3 | 2.05% | #14-03 | 2,680 | $978 | $2.620m |
| 18 | 26 Feb 2001 | -$624k | 4.8 | -3.01% | #16-03 | 2,680 | $1,474 | $3.950m |
| 17 | 15 Jan 2001 | -$600k | 1.4 | -11.58% | #11-01 | 2,680 | $1,194 | $3.200m |
| 16 | 7 Sep 2000 | -$3k | 5.3 | -0.01% | #09-02 | 3,348 | $1,538 | $5.150m |
| 15 | 1 Sep 2000 | -$250k | 5.3 | -1.3% | #19-01 | 2,680 | $1,287 | $3.450m |
| 14 | 25 Feb 2000 | $250k | 0.8 | 8.98% | #06-01 | 2,680 | $1,418 | $3.800m |
| 13 | 10 Feb 2000 | -$23k | 4.6 | -0.09% | #19-02 | 3,348 | $1,673 | $5.600m |
| 12 | 3 Feb 2000 | -$474k | 4 | -2.12% | #22-02 | 3,348 | $1,583 | $5.300m |
| 11 | 15 Nov 1999 | -$606k | 3.2 | -4.33% | #17-03 | 2,680 | $1,496 | $4.010m |
| 10 | 1 Oct 1999 | -$230k | 4.3 | -1.03% | #11-02 | 3,348 | $1,497 | $5.010m |
| 9 | 4 Aug 1999 | -$631k | 3.2 | -4.52% | #15-03 | 2,680 | $1,455 | $3.900m |
| 8 | 10 Jul 1999 | -$600k | 2.9 | -5.34% | #04-03 | 2,680 | $1,306 | $3.500m |
| 7 | 5 May 1999 | -$803k | 3.2 | -4.53% | #23-02 | 3,348 | $1,500 | $5.022m |
| 6 | 6 Apr 1999 | -$1,066k | 2.9 | -8.97% | #16-01 | 2,680 | $1,261 | $3.380m |
| 5 | 1 Apr 1999 | -$1,170k | 3.8 | -6.02% | #17-02 | 3,348 | $1,300 | $4.352m |
| 4 | 1 Apr 1999 | -$1,032k | 3 | -8.36% | #18-01 | 2,680 | $1,306 | $3.500m |
| 3 | 11 Jun 1998 | -$1,031k | 1.2 | -18.17% | #20-03 | 2,680 | $1,418 | $3.800m |
| 2 | 27 May 1998 | -$1,270k | 1 | -27.96% | #17-01 | 2,680 | $1,242 | $3.330m |
| 1 | 22 May 1996 | $554k | 1 | 10.96% | #10-02 | 3,348 | $1,718 | $5.750m |