The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
Scotts 28 Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D9 ≫ Scotts 28 ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 172 |
| Number of unprofitable | 42 |
| Highest Profit | $1,975,400 |
| Longest Held | 28.2 years |
| Highest Annualized | 999% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 215 | 8 Aug 2025 | $730k | 27.8 | 0.58% | #16-05 | 2,034 | $2,409 | $4.900m |
| 214 | 21 Jul 2025 | $470k | 15.2 | 0.71% | #05-05 | 2,034 | $2,271 | $4.620m |
| 213 | 16 Jul 2025 | $1,630k | 23.1 | 1.98% | #08-05 | 2,034 | $2,202 | $4.480m |
| 212 | 26 Jan 2024 | $1,280k | 24.4 | 1.71% | #17-04 | 1,658 | $2,280 | $3.780m |
| 211 | 15 Jan 2024 | $732k | 28.2 | 1.32% | #03-02 | 1,098 | $2,157 | $2.368m |
| 210 | 26 May 2023 | $1,975k | 27.6 | 2.26% | #08-01 | 1,733 | $2,481 | $4.300m |
| 209 | 14 Apr 2023 | $1,373k | 23.8 | 1.8% | #20-04 | 1,658 | $2,394 | $3.968m |
| 208 | 22 Aug 2022 | $1,232k | 22.4 | 1.67% | #23-03 | 1,636 | $2,433 | $3.980m |
| 207 | 24 Jun 2022 | $703k | 13.8 | 1.52% | #07-03 | 1,636 | $2,280 | $3.730m |
| 206 | 22 Apr 2022 | $249k | 7.2 | 1.46% | #22-02 | 1,098 | $2,277 | $2.500m |
| 205 | 11 Mar 2022 | -$150k | 9.4 | -0.69% | #06-02 | 1,098 | $2,049 | $2.250m |
| 204 | 9 Jul 2021 | $180k | 8.6 | 0.57% | #22-03 | 1,636 | $2,310 | $3.780m |
| 203 | 30 Apr 2021 | $1,790k | 25.5 | 1.73% | #27-01 | 2,217 | $2,282 | $5.060m |
| 202 | 1 Apr 2021 | $35k | 13.6 | 0.07% | #06-04 | 1,658 | $2,172 | $3.600m |
| 201 | 8 Oct 2020 | $850k | 11.3 | 2.23% | #10-01 | 1,733 | $2,222 | $3.850m |
| 200 | 23 Sep 2020 | $732k | 21.1 | 0.93% | #17-05 | 2,034 | $2,040 | $4.150m |
| 199 | 23 Oct 2019 | $720k | 9.7 | 1.77% | #18-05 | 2,034 | $2,261 | $4.600m |
| 198 | 3 May 2019 | $1,200k | 9.9 | 3.9% | #13-04 | 1,658 | $2,292 | $3.800m |
| 197 | 26 Dec 2018 | $1,452k | 19.7 | 2.79% | #04-04 | 1,658 | $2,090 | $3.465m |
| 196 | 20 Jul 2018 | $180k | 7.2 | 0.7% | #18-03 | 1,636 | $2,249 | $3.680m |
| 195 | 6 Jun 2018 | $338k | 4 | 2.26% | #21-01 | 1,733 | $2,272 | $3.938m |
| 194 | 4 Apr 2018 | $799k | 22.1 | 1.17% | #02-01 | 1,733 | $2,031 | $3.520m |
| 193 | 26 Mar 2018 | $980k | 11.4 | 3.05% | #05-03 | 1,636 | $2,066 | $3.380m |
| 192 | 13 Feb 2018 | $364k | 18.3 | 0.7% | #06-01 | 1,733 | $1,760 | $3.050m |
| 191 | 6 Feb 2018 | $186k | 6.7 | 0.83% | #08-04 | 1,658 | $2,062 | $3.419m |
| 190 | 26 Jan 2018 | $813k | 22.1 | 0.97% | #09-05 | 2,034 | $2,069 | $4.210m |
| 189 | 6 Sep 2017 | $1,100k | 12.7 | 2.42% | #10-05 | 2,034 | $2,065 | $4.200m |
| 188 | 23 Aug 2017 | $1,003k | 21.8 | 1.75% | #10-04 | 1,658 | $1,923 | $3.188m |
| 187 | 17 May 2017 | $800k | 21.5 | 1.3% | #24-04 | 1,658 | $1,991 | $3.300m |
| 186 | 28 Feb 2017 | -$479k | 4.4 | -2.82% | #18-01 | 1,733 | $2,048 | $3.550m |
| 185 | 3 Jan 2017 | -$100k | 6.4 | -0.37% | #06-05 | 2,034 | $2,065 | $4.200m |
| 184 | 26 Oct 2016 | -$90k | 8.3 | -0.32% | #26-03 | 1,647 | $2,016 | $3.320m |
| 183 | 21 Sep 2016 | $171k | 20.5 | 0.26% | #25-03 | 1,647 | $2,004 | $3.300m |
| 182 | 12 Aug 2016 | $1,208k | 20.8 | 1.74% | #20-05 | 2,034 | $1,966 | $4.000m |
| 181 | 1 Apr 2016 | -$520k | 8.9 | -1.72% | #18-04 | 1,658 | $1,888 | $3.130m |
| 180 | 29 Jan 2015 | $850k | 10.4 | 4.66% | #22-02 | 1,098 | $2,050 | $2.251m |
| 179 | 21 Oct 2014 | $400k | 4.8 | 2.72% | #02-03 | 1,636 | $2,017 | $3.300m |
| 178 | 2 Jun 2014 | -$39k | 7.2 | -0.15% | #21-01 | 1,733 | $2,077 | $3.600m |
| 177 | 30 Sep 2013 | $1,234k | 17.9 | 2.26% | #24-01 | 1,744 | $2,151 | $3.750m |
| 176 | 27 Dec 2012 | $1,100k | 7.6 | 8.24% | #16-02 | 1,098 | $2,213 | $2.430m |
| 175 | 3 Dec 2012 | $901k | 17 | 1.71% | #22-03 | 1,636 | $2,200 | $3.600m |
| 174 | 24 Oct 2012 | $533k | 16.6 | 1.53% | #06-02 | 1,098 | $2,186 | $2.400m |
| 173 | 2 Oct 2012 | $757k | 16.7 | 1.42% | #14-01 | 1,733 | $2,077 | $3.600m |
| 172 | 27 Sep 2012 | $216k | 5.4 | 1.03% | #18-01 | 1,733 | $2,325 | $4.029m |
| 171 | 22 Jun 2012 | $933k | 16.6 | 3.1% | #08-02 | 1,098 | $2,140 | $2.350m |
| 170 | 2 Apr 2012 | $930k | 16.1 | 1.3% | #29-02 | 2,271 | $2,179 | $4.950m |
| 169 | 6 Mar 2012 | $927k | 16.3 | 2.25% | #04-03 | 1,636 | $1,864 | $3.050m |
| 168 | 1 Nov 2011 | -$100k | 4.4 | -0.63% | #22-04 | 1,658 | $2,111 | $3.500m |
| 167 | 26 Aug 2011 | $895k | 15.8 | 2.97% | #21-02 | 1,098 | $2,204 | $2.420m |
| 166 | 16 Aug 2011 | $295k | 1.4 | 6.16% | #16-01 | 1,733 | $2,149 | $3.725m |
| 165 | 28 Jun 2011 | $654k | 15.5 | 1.3% | #17-01 | 1,733 | $2,077 | $3.600m |
| 164 | 9 May 2011 | $1,409k | 12.8 | 4.57% | #08-04 | 1,658 | $1,950 | $3.233m |
| 163 | 29 Apr 2011 | $677k | 12 | 1.84% | #23-01 | 1,733 | $1,991 | $3.450m |
| 162 | 28 Apr 2011 | $1,197k | 15.4 | 2.76% | #18-03 | 1,636 | $2,139 | $3.500m |
| 161 | 27 Apr 2011 | $1,725k | 7.3 | 8.47% | #15-01 | 1,733 | $2,222 | $3.850m |
| 160 | 13 Apr 2011 | $1,281k | 4.4 | 9.36% | #13-01 | 1,733 | $2,250 | $3.900m |
| 159 | 27 Oct 2010 | $481k | 11.2 | 2.18% | #14-02 | 1,098 | $2,038 | $2.238m |
| 158 | 10 Aug 2010 | $970k | 1.2 | 24.43% | #06-05 | 2,034 | $2,114 | $4.300m |
| 157 | 29 Jul 2010 | $1,140k | 14.7 | 2.95% | #05-04 | 1,658 | $1,976 | $3.275m |
| 156 | 12 Jul 2010 | $863k | 1.2 | 28.18% | #16-04 | 1,658 | $2,041 | $3.383m |
| 155 | 26 May 2010 | -$102k | 3.1 | -0.94% | #02-04 | 1,658 | $2,039 | $3.380m |
| 154 | 6 May 2010 | $830k | 14.3 | 1.58% | #05-05 | 2,034 | $2,040 | $4.150m |
| 153 | 30 Mar 2010 | $540k | 14.4 | 1.19% | #16-01 | 1,733 | $1,979 | $3.430m |
| 152 | 25 Mar 2010 | $149k | 13.7 | 0.33% | #23-04 | 1,658 | $2,040 | $3.382m |
| 151 | 12 Feb 2010 | $320k | 14.1 | 0.61% | #18-05 | 2,034 | $1,907 | $3.880m |
| 150 | 30 Dec 2009 | $282k | 12.8 | 0.8% | #02-03 | 1,636 | $1,772 | $2.900m |
| 149 | 24 Dec 2009 | $1,017k | 7.7 | 4.49% | #20-01 | 1,733 | $2,037 | $3.530m |
| 148 | 13 Nov 2009 | $851k | 3 | 6.65% | #27-02 | 2,271 | $2,135 | $4.850m |
| 147 | 4 Nov 2009 | $984k | 14 | 2.3% | #04-05 | 2,034 | $1,779 | $3.620m |
| 146 | 8 Oct 2009 | $440k | 9.7 | 2.31% | #26-02 | 1,098 | $2,022 | $2.220m |
| 145 | 4 Sep 2009 | $913k | 13.8 | 2.42% | #09-01 | 1,733 | $1,875 | $3.250m |
| 144 | 20 Aug 2009 | $63k | 2.5 | 0.89% | #03-03 | 1,636 | $1,750 | $2.863m |
| 143 | 9 Jun 2009 | $96k | 13.6 | 0.22% | #06-05 | 2,034 | $1,637 | $3.330m |
| 142 | 9 Jun 2009 | $650k | 12.6 | 1.96% | #10-01 | 1,733 | $1,731 | $3.000m |
| 141 | 5 Jun 2009 | $255k | 13.6 | 1.08% | #10-02 | 1,098 | $1,712 | $1.880m |
| 140 | 29 May 2009 | -$200k | 2.3 | -3.22% | #13-04 | 1,658 | $1,568 | $2.600m |
| 139 | 5 May 2009 | $284k | 13.5 | 0.89% | #16-04 | 1,658 | $1,520 | $2.520m |
| 138 | 29 Aug 2008 | $597k | 2 | 11.59% | #07-03 | 1,636 | $1,850 | $3.027m |
| 137 | 20 Jun 2008 | $1,010k | 2.1 | 17.78% | #26-03 | 1,647 | $2,071 | $3.410m |
| 136 | 16 May 2008 | $1,410k | 3 | 21.95% | #03-04 | 1,658 | $1,900 | $3.150m |
| 135 | 10 Aug 2007 | $1,128k | 8.2 | 4.75% | #06-04 | 1,658 | $2,150 | $3.565m |
| 134 | 4 Jun 2007 | $607k | 10.1 | 1.73% | #05-01 | 1,733 | $2,200 | $3.813m |
| 133 | 28 May 2007 | $1,145k | 11.4 | 3.08% | #19-03 | 1,636 | $2,400 | $3.926m |
| 132 | 25 May 2007 | $1,296k | 11.5 | 3.95% | #22-04 | 1,658 | $2,172 | $3.600m |
| 131 | 24 May 2007 | $1,162k | 8.1 | 4.44% | #07-05 | 2,034 | $1,917 | $3.900m |
| 130 | 22 May 2007 | $997k | 7.2 | 4.52% | #18-04 | 1,658 | $2,202 | $3.650m |
| 129 | 10 May 2007 | $1,152k | 7.9 | 4.69% | #18-01 | 1,733 | $2,200 | $3.813m |
| 128 | 5 Apr 2007 | $1,682k | 2.6 | 28.75% | #02-04 | 1,658 | $2,100 | $3.482m |
| 127 | 2 Apr 2007 | $639k | 0.2 | 196.7% | #21-01 | 1,733 | $2,100 | $3.639m |
| 126 | 1 Mar 2007 | $711k | 7.6 | 3.07% | #12-01 | 1,733 | $2,000 | $3.466m |
| 125 | 26 Feb 2007 | $458k | 11.3 | 2.44% | #12-02 | 1,098 | $1,753 | $1.925m |
| 124 | 23 Feb 2007 | -$284k | 10.6 | -0.91% | #13-04 | 1,658 | $1,689 | $2.800m |
| 123 | 14 Feb 2007 | $500k | 5.9 | 2.63% | #03-05 | 2,034 | $1,720 | $3.500m |
| 122 | 13 Feb 2007 | $550k | 0.4 | 69.27% | #03-03 | 1,636 | $1,711 | $2.800m |
| 121 | 29 Jan 2007 | $535k | 11 | 1.8% | #21-01 | 1,733 | $1,731 | $3.000m |
| 120 | 29 Dec 2006 | $185k | 4.9 | 2.37% | #13-02 | 1,098 | $1,548 | $1.700m |
| 119 | 14 Nov 2006 | $931k | 11 | 2.44% | #27-02 | 2,271 | $1,761 | $3.999m |
| 118 | 8 Nov 2006 | $286k | 10.1 | 1.09% | #26-01 | 1,744 | $1,577 | $2.750m |
| 117 | 1 Nov 2006 | $278k | 11 | 1.02% | #13-01 | 1,733 | $1,511 | $2.619m |
| 116 | 14 Sep 2006 | $290k | 2.5 | 5.72% | #03-03 | 1,636 | $1,375 | $2.250m |
| 115 | 28 Aug 2006 | -$188k | 10.6 | -0.7% | #07-03 | 1,636 | $1,485 | $2.430m |
| 114 | 28 Apr 2006 | $200k | 1.9 | 4.62% | #26-03 | 1,647 | $1,457 | $2.400m |
| 113 | 27 Feb 2006 | -$904k | 10 | -3.55% | #26-04 | 1,658 | $1,255 | $2.080m |
| 112 | 26 Oct 2005 | -$8k | 9.5 | -0.04% | #20-03 | 1,636 | $1,345 | $2.200m |
| 111 | 19 May 2005 | -$440k | 6 | -3.66% | #03-04 | 1,658 | $1,050 | $1.740m |
| 110 | 17 May 2005 | -$430k | 5.6 | -4.86% | #16-02 | 1,098 | $1,211 | $1.330m |
| 109 | 9 May 2005 | $10k | 9.5 | 0.04% | #19-01 | 1,733 | $1,414 | $2.450m |
| 108 | 22 Dec 2004 | -$734k | 8.7 | -2.41% | #10-05 | 2,034 | $1,524 | $3.100m |
| 107 | 10 Sep 2004 | -$124k | 8.8 | -0.97% | #19-02 | 1,098 | $1,266 | $1.390m |
| 106 | 31 Aug 2004 | -$859k | 6.8 | -6.77% | #22-02 | 1,098 | $1,276 | $1.401m |
| 105 | 26 Aug 2004 | -$309k | 8.8 | -1.79% | #02-04 | 1,658 | $1,086 | $1.800m |
| 104 | 24 May 2004 | -$570k | 3.3 | -6.74% | #26-03 | 1,647 | $1,336 | $2.200m |
| 103 | 19 May 2004 | -$1,008k | 8.1 | -4.73% | #21-03 | 1,636 | $1,284 | $2.100m |
| 102 | 22 Mar 2004 | -$658k | 8 | -3.54% | #03-03 | 1,636 | $1,198 | $1.960m |
| 101 | 6 Jan 2004 | -$289k | 8.1 | -1.55% | #15-01 | 1,733 | $1,226 | $2.125m |
| 100 | 5 Jan 2004 | -$369k | 8 | -1.83% | #12-03 | 1,636 | $1,424 | $2.330m |
| 99 | 27 Mar 2003 | -$517k | 6.9 | -4.57% | #05-02 | 1,098 | $1,230 | $1.350m |
| 98 | 14 Jun 2002 | $188k | 6.4 | 1.08% | #08-05 | 2,034 | $1,401 | $2.850m |
| 97 | 20 May 2002 | -$1,391k | 4.8 | -7.19% | #28-01 | 2,174 | $1,480 | $3.218m |
| 96 | 1 Apr 2002 | -$440k | 6.4 | -2.2% | #21-05 | 2,034 | $1,413 | $2.875m |
| 95 | 26 Mar 2002 | -$87k | 6.4 | -0.53% | #20-01 | 1,733 | $1,450 | $2.513m |
| 94 | 1 Feb 2002 | -$374k | 5.2 | -4.13% | #13-02 | 1,098 | $1,380 | $1.515m |
| 93 | 15 Jan 2002 | $37k | 6.2 | 0.39% | #17-02 | 1,098 | $1,394 | $1.530m |
| 92 | 9 Apr 2001 | -$794k | 5 | -5.76% | #04-01 | 1,733 | $1,342 | $2.325m |
| 91 | 9 Mar 2001 | -$764k | 4.1 | -5.43% | #03-05 | 2,034 | $1,475 | $3.000m |
| 90 | 6 Feb 2001 | -$30k | 1.2 | -0.9% | #26-03 | 1,647 | $1,682 | $2.770m |
| 89 | 1 Oct 2000 | $453k | 5 | 3.86% | #10-03 | 1,636 | $1,620 | $2.650m |
| 88 | 31 Mar 2000 | $463k | 4.4 | 4.29% | #23-03 | 1,636 | $1,680 | $2.748m |
| 87 | 1 Mar 2000 | $383k | 4.3 | 3.69% | #18-04 | 1,658 | $1,600 | $2.653m |
| 86 | 1 Mar 2000 | $170k | 4.3 | 2.37% | #11-02 | 1,098 | $1,612 | $1.770m |
| 85 | 1 Feb 2000 | $335k | 4.2 | 4.87% | #24-02 | 1,098 | $1,680 | $1.845m |
| 84 | 1 Feb 2000 | -$389k | 3.7 | -5.26% | #26-02 | 1,098 | $1,621 | $1.780m |
| 83 | 1 Dec 1999 | $446k | 3.9 | 4.52% | #26-03 | 1,647 | $1,700 | $2.800m |
| 82 | 1 Nov 1999 | $400k | 4 | 4.11% | #06-01 | 1,733 | $1,550 | $2.686m |
| 81 | 1 Oct 1999 | $272k | 3.9 | 4.41% | #16-02 | 1,098 | $1,603 | $1.760m |
| 80 | 1 Sep 1999 | $702k | 3.9 | 6.11% | #17-05 | 2,034 | $1,680 | $3.418m |
| 79 | 1 Aug 1999 | $355k | 0.3 | 52.58% | #12-01 | 1,733 | $1,590 | $2.755m |
| 78 | 1 Aug 1999 | $0k | 3.7 | 0% | #14-02 | 1,098 | $1,600 | $1.757m |
| 77 | 6 Jul 1999 | $982k | 3.6 | 4.92% | #28-03 | 3,466 | $1,775 | $6.152m |
| 76 | 1 Jul 1999 | $183k | 3.7 | 1.96% | #18-01 | 1,733 | $1,535 | $2.660m |
| 75 | 15 Jun 1999 | $307k | 3.6 | 3.58% | #20-04 | 1,658 | $1,565 | $2.595m |
| 74 | 1 Jun 1999 | $494k | 3.1 | 5.28% | #25-05 | 2,045 | $1,650 | $3.374m |
| 73 | 1 Jun 1999 | $294k | 3.5 | 3.69% | #06-04 | 1,658 | $1,470 | $2.437m |
| 72 | 6 May 1999 | $252k | 3.5 | 4.55% | #23-02 | 1,098 | $1,600 | $1.757m |
| 71 | 1 May 1999 | $283k | 3.5 | 3.15% | #23-01 | 1,733 | $1,600 | $2.773m |
| 70 | 1 May 1999 | -$257k | 3.3 | -3.34% | #03-04 | 1,658 | $1,315 | $2.180m |
| 69 | 21 Apr 1999 | $272k | 3.1 | 3.47% | #02-05 | 2,034 | $1,350 | $2.746m |
| 68 | 20 Apr 1999 | -$187k | 3.1 | -3.43% | #09-02 | 1,098 | $1,470 | $1.614m |
| 67 | 9 Apr 1999 | $318k | 2.9 | 3.36% | #29-01 | 2,174 | $1,600 | $3.479m |
| 66 | 7 Apr 1999 | -$886k | 3.2 | -11.58% | #14-04 | 1,658 | $1,116 | $1.850m |
| 65 | 4 Apr 1999 | $24k | 3.4 | 0.3% | #12-01 | 1,733 | $1,385 | $2.400m |
| 64 | 2 Apr 1999 | -$346k | 3.3 | -4.72% | #04-04 | 1,658 | $1,214 | $2.013m |
| 63 | 1 Apr 1999 | -$875k | 2.8 | -8.7% | #22-05 | 2,034 | $1,500 | $3.051m |
| 62 | 1 Apr 1999 | $54k | 3.4 | 0.59% | #07-05 | 2,034 | $1,346 | $2.738m |
| 61 | 1 Apr 1999 | -$654k | 2.6 | -8.91% | #08-03 | 1,636 | $1,450 | $2.372m |
| 60 | 21 Jul 1998 | -$912k | 2.4 | -15.47% | #08-04 | 1,658 | $1,100 | $1.824m |
| 59 | 3 Feb 1998 | $632k | 2.2 | 12.08% | #09-04 | 1,658 | $1,695 | $2.809m |
| 58 | 4 Nov 1997 | $760k | 2 | 22.69% | #22-02 | 1,098 | $2,058 | $2.260m |
| 57 | 1 Nov 1997 | $435k | 1.7 | 6.84% | #16-05 | 2,034 | $2,050 | $4.170m |
| 56 | 5 Aug 1997 | $1,435k | 1.3 | 38.64% | #23-05 | 2,034 | $2,100 | $4.271m |
| 55 | 25 Jul 1997 | $1,463k | 1.3 | 33.69% | #28-01 | 2,174 | $2,120 | $4.609m |
| 54 | 6 May 1997 | $932k | 1.5 | 26.19% | #05-01 | 1,733 | $1,850 | $3.206m |
| 53 | 23 Apr 1997 | $1,225k | 1 | 42.6% | #24-05 | 2,045 | $2,000 | $4.090m |
| 52 | 1 Mar 1997 | $516k | 1.3 | 18.39% | #02-03 | 1,636 | $1,600 | $2.618m |
| 51 | 14 Feb 1997 | $1,143k | 1.3 | 32.93% | #03-05 | 2,034 | $1,850 | $3.764m |
| 50 | 12 Nov 1996 | $132k | 0.8 | 9.71% | #13-02 | 1,098 | $1,721 | $1.889m |
| 49 | 22 Aug 1996 | $442k | 0.7 | 23.94% | #08-03 | 1,636 | $1,850 | $3.027m |
| 48 | 17 Jul 1996 | $17k | 0.2 | 2.4% | #13-04 | 1,658 | $1,860 | $3.084m |
| 47 | 13 Jun 1996 | $1,962k | 0.1 | 999% | #29-03 | 3,466 | $1,979 | $6.860m |
| 46 | 6 Jun 1996 | $132k | 0.2 | 35.88% | #15-02 | 1,098 | $1,920 | $2.108m |
| 45 | 5 Jun 1996 | $82k | 0.1 | 52.63% | #26-02 | 1,098 | $1,975 | $2.169m |
| 44 | 2 May 1996 | $436k | 0.5 | 64.95% | #26-02 | 1,098 | $1,900 | $2.086m |
| 43 | 26 Apr 1996 | $858k | 0.5 | 101.89% | #04-01 | 1,733 | $1,800 | $3.119m |
| 42 | 25 Apr 1996 | $807k | 0.5 | 83% | #13-04 | 1,658 | $1,850 | $3.067m |
| 41 | 25 Apr 1996 | $442k | 0.5 | 75.2% | #05-02 | 1,098 | $1,700 | $1.867m |
| 40 | 16 Apr 1996 | $131k | 0.1 | 36.54% | #21-03 | 1,636 | $1,900 | $3.108m |
| 39 | 2 Apr 1996 | $165k | 0.1 | 77.43% | #25-03 | 1,647 | $1,900 | $3.129m |
| 38 | 2 Apr 1996 | $437k | 0.4 | 88.91% | #06-02 | 1,098 | $1,700 | $1.867m |
| 37 | 1 Apr 1996 | $275k | 0.1 | 95.64% | #10-05 | 2,034 | $1,885 | $3.834m |
| 36 | 21 Mar 1996 | $734k | 0.4 | 124.15% | #07-04 | 1,658 | $1,740 | $2.885m |
| 35 | 21 Mar 1996 | $494k | 0.4 | 96.75% | #15-02 | 1,098 | $1,800 | $1.976m |
| 34 | 15 Mar 1996 | $208k | 0.3 | 25.98% | #02-01 | 1,733 | $1,570 | $2.721m |
| 33 | 13 Mar 1996 | $505k | 0.4 | 71.12% | #03-03 | 1,636 | $1,600 | $2.618m |
| 32 | 1 Mar 1996 | $1,034k | 0.4 | 140.65% | #16-05 | 2,034 | $1,836 | $3.734m |
| 31 | 1 Mar 1996 | $379k | 0.3 | 123.51% | #09-02 | 1,098 | $1,640 | $1.801m |
| 30 | 29 Feb 1996 | $621k | 0.2 | 178.21% | #25-03 | 1,647 | $1,800 | $2.965m |
| 29 | 27 Feb 1996 | $643k | 0.3 | 132.33% | #21-03 | 1,636 | $1,820 | $2.978m |
| 28 | 22 Feb 1996 | $567k | 0.2 | 182.01% | #08-04 | 1,658 | $1,650 | $2.736m |
| 27 | 8 Feb 1996 | $325k | 0.2 | 71.65% | #03-01 | 1,733 | $1,485 | $2.574m |
| 26 | 3 Feb 1996 | $516k | 0.2 | 157.08% | #14-04 | 1,658 | $1,650 | $2.736m |
| 25 | 31 Jan 1996 | $358k | 0.3 | 124.03% | #13-02 | 1,098 | $1,600 | $1.757m |
| 24 | 30 Jan 1996 | $668k | 0.2 | 190.47% | #05-05 | 2,034 | $1,632 | $3.320m |
| 23 | 24 Jan 1996 | $61k | 0 | 54.23% | #12-05 | 2,034 | $1,700 | $3.458m |
| 22 | 20 Jan 1996 | $320k | 0.2 | 104.34% | #03-04 | 1,658 | $1,470 | $2.437m |
| 21 | 19 Jan 1996 | $196k | 0.1 | 68.15% | #19-03 | 1,636 | $1,700 | $2.781m |
| 20 | 16 Jan 1996 | $131k | 0.2 | 34.74% | #12-03 | 1,636 | $1,650 | $2.699m |
| 19 | 12 Jan 1996 | $476k | 0.2 | 226.82% | #14-03 | 1,636 | $1,660 | $2.716m |
| 18 | 9 Jan 1996 | $756k | 0.1 | 820.37% | #12-05 | 2,034 | $1,670 | $3.397m |
| 17 | 8 Jan 1996 | $70k | 0.1 | 22.18% | #14-01 | 1,733 | $1,640 | $2.843m |
| 16 | 6 Jan 1996 | $82k | 0.1 | 34.18% | #07-03 | 1,636 | $1,600 | $2.618m |
| 15 | 3 Jan 1996 | $799k | 0.2 | 229.24% | #18-05 | 2,034 | $1,750 | $3.560m |
| 14 | 30 Nov 1995 | $217k | 0 | 999% | #02-02 | 1,098 | $1,480 | $1.625m |
| 13 | 28 Nov 1995 | $518k | 0.1 | 692.06% | #08-03 | 1,636 | $1,580 | $2.585m |
| 12 | 28 Nov 1995 | $381k | 0.1 | 335.07% | #07-03 | 1,636 | $1,550 | $2.536m |
| 11 | 25 Nov 1995 | $280k | 0.1 | 419.12% | #14-02 | 1,098 | $1,600 | $1.757m |
| 10 | 21 Nov 1995 | -$170k | 0 | -99.25% | #16-03 | 1,636 | $1,497 | $2.450m |
| 9 | 20 Nov 1995 | $375k | 0.1 | 999% | #17-04 | 1,658 | $1,580 | $2.620m |
| 8 | 15 Nov 1995 | $410k | 0 | 999% | #11-03 | 1,636 | $1,600 | $2.618m |
| 7 | 13 Nov 1995 | $565k | 0 | 999% | #06-05 | 2,034 | $1,590 | $3.234m |
| 6 | 11 Nov 1995 | $277k | 0 | 999% | #02-01 | 1,733 | $1,450 | $2.513m |
| 5 | 9 Nov 1995 | $139k | 0.1 | 350.15% | #11-02 | 1,098 | $1,457 | $1.600m |
| 4 | 1 Nov 1995 | $367k | 0 | 999% | #15-03 | 1,636 | $1,600 | $2.618m |
| 3 | 1 Nov 1995 | -$719k | 0 | -100% | #13-03 | 1,636 | $855 | $1.398m |
| 2 | 27 Oct 1995 | $585k | 0 | 999% | #16-01 | 1,733 | $1,668 | $2.890m |
| 1 | 23 Oct 1995 | $49k | 0 | 280.48% | #13-04 | 1,658 | $1,363 | $2.260m |