The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
Nathan Residences Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D10 ≫ Nathan Residences ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 76 |
| Number of unprofitable | 4 |
| Highest Profit | $619,330 |
| Longest Held | 13.4 years |
| Highest Annualized | 999% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | 12 Jun 2024 | $260k | 12 | 1.54% | #10-06 | 775 | $2,013 | $1.560m |
| 79 | 19 Mar 2024 | $160k | 5.8 | 2.32% | #09-04 | 592 | $2,162 | $1.280m |
| 78 | 24 Oct 2023 | -$11k | 10.5 | -0.09% | #11-08 | 592 | $1,924 | $1.139m |
| 77 | 5 Sep 2023 | $100k | 10.4 | 0.56% | #12-07 | 1,238 | $1,438 | $1.780m |
| 76 | 8 May 2023 | $290k | 5.5 | 3.66% | #03-07 | 775 | $2,090 | $1.620m |
| 75 | 22 Dec 2022 | $330k | 12.9 | 2.72% | #04-04 | 592 | $1,909 | $1.130m |
| 74 | 28 Nov 2022 | $619k | 13.4 | 3.71% | #06-07 | 775 | $2,065 | $1.600m |
| 73 | 16 Sep 2022 | $57k | 9.3 | 0.35% | #12-02 | 1,238 | $1,454 | $1.800m |
| 72 | 4 Jul 2022 | $150k | 4.6 | 2.19% | #09-06 | 775 | $2,065 | $1.600m |
| 71 | 11 Apr 2022 | $90k | 3.7 | 1.61% | #05-03 | 775 | $2,000 | $1.550m |
| 70 | 11 Jan 2022 | $244k | 12.5 | 1.62% | #01-04 | 861 | $1,556 | $1.340m |
| 69 | 3 May 2021 | $30k | 8.4 | 0.3% | #01-05 | 840 | $1,429 | $1.200m |
| 68 | 29 Dec 2020 | $478k | 11.5 | 3.53% | #06-03 | 775 | $1,871 | $1.450m |
| 67 | 12 Aug 2020 | $375k | 11.1 | 2.92% | #04-06 | 775 | $1,768 | $1.370m |
| 66 | 6 Aug 2020 | $20k | 8.2 | 0.25% | #04-08 | 592 | $1,689 | $1.000m |
| 65 | 17 Jul 2018 | -$20k | 5.3 | -0.26% | #05-03 | 775 | $1,884 | $1.460m |
| 64 | 25 May 2018 | $185k | 7.4 | 2.48% | #09-04 | 592 | $1,892 | $1.120m |
| 63 | 22 May 2018 | $525k | 9 | 4.92% | #09-02 | 775 | $1,935 | $1.500m |
| 62 | 2 May 2018 | $70k | 5.6 | 0.91% | #10-07 | 775 | $1,817 | $1.408m |
| 61 | 28 Feb 2018 | $162k | 7.5 | 2.15% | #05-08 | 592 | $1,858 | $1.100m |
| 60 | 1 Feb 2018 | -$7k | 7.3 | -0.06% | #01-03 | 947 | $1,568 | $1.485m |
| 59 | 9 Jan 2018 | $402k | 8.5 | 4.13% | #05-07 | 775 | $1,781 | $1.380m |
| 58 | 15 Dec 2017 | $190k | 5.8 | 2.45% | #09-06 | 775 | $1,871 | $1.450m |
| 57 | 14 Nov 2017 | $120k | 6.5 | 1.46% | #03-07 | 775 | $1,716 | $1.330m |
| 56 | 8 Nov 2017 | $197k | 5.6 | 3.65% | #02-01 | 592 | $1,828 | $1.082m |
| 55 | 20 Oct 2017 | $110k | 5.8 | 1.48% | #09-07 | 775 | $1,729 | $1.340m |
| 54 | 19 Oct 2017 | -$135k | 4.5 | -2.65% | #05-01 | 592 | $1,774 | $1.050m |
| 53 | 15 May 2017 | $307k | 7.9 | 4.5% | #06-08 | 592 | $1,765 | $1.045m |
| 52 | 6 Jan 2017 | $2k | 4.7 | 0.04% | #02-08 | 592 | $1,605 | $0.950m |
| 51 | 23 Dec 2016 | $230k | 7.4 | 2.61% | #05-02 | 775 | $1,716 | $1.330m |
| 50 | 23 Apr 2015 | $486k | 5.8 | 7.25% | #02-07 | 775 | $1,871 | $1.450m |
| 49 | 5 Mar 2015 | $401k | 5.7 | 7.86% | #03-04 | 592 | $1,943 | $1.150m |
| 48 | 17 Oct 2014 | $390k | 4.7 | 6.44% | #08-03 | 775 | $1,974 | $1.530m |
| 47 | 17 Jul 2013 | $283k | 3.3 | 8.31% | #11-05 | 592 | $2,078 | $1.230m |
| 46 | 7 Jun 2013 | $420k | 3.9 | 11.82% | #08-01 | 592 | $1,993 | $1.180m |
| 45 | 19 Apr 2013 | $459k | 3.8 | 13.68% | #05-01 | 592 | $2,002 | $1.185m |
| 44 | 8 Apr 2013 | $369k | 3.8 | 10.8% | #11-08 | 592 | $1,943 | $1.150m |
| 43 | 28 Mar 2013 | $480k | 3.8 | 11.01% | #05-03 | 775 | $1,910 | $1.480m |
| 42 | 2 Mar 2013 | $309k | 3.4 | 9.63% | #05-05 | 592 | $1,922 | $1.138m |
| 41 | 23 Jan 2013 | $287k | 3 | 10.49% | #03-01 | 592 | $1,850 | $1.095m |
| 40 | 10 Jan 2013 | $399k | 3.5 | 13.26% | #03-08 | 592 | $1,888 | $1.118m |
| 39 | 4 Jan 2013 | $386k | 3.5 | 9.91% | #07-06 | 786 | $1,744 | $1.370m |
| 38 | 14 Dec 2012 | $102k | 3.5 | 2.67% | #01-05 | 840 | $1,394 | $1.170m |
| 37 | 5 Oct 2012 | $428k | 3.2 | 11.99% | #06-02 | 786 | $1,769 | $1.390m |
| 36 | 21 Sep 2012 | $387k | 3.3 | 10.91% | #07-07 | 786 | $1,718 | $1.350m |
| 35 | 14 Sep 2012 | $308k | 3.2 | 8.57% | #10-07 | 775 | $1,726 | $1.338m |
| 34 | 3 Sep 2012 | $406k | 3.2 | 11.39% | #08-02 | 786 | $1,782 | $1.400m |
| 33 | 26 Jun 2012 | $280k | 3 | 8.48% | #10-06 | 786 | $1,654 | $1.300m |
| 32 | 11 Jun 2012 | $260k | 3 | 10.97% | #04-08 | 592 | $1,655 | $0.980m |
| 31 | 30 Apr 2012 | $220k | 2.8 | 9.78% | #02-08 | 592 | $1,601 | $0.948m |
| 30 | 2 Apr 2012 | $266k | 2.8 | 9.15% | #03-02 | 786 | $1,578 | $1.240m |
| 29 | 28 Mar 2012 | $62k | 2.5 | 2.9% | #02-01 | 592 | $1,495 | $0.885m |
| 28 | 27 Mar 2012 | $199k | 2.7 | 6.85% | #06-06 | 786 | $1,527 | $1.200m |
| 27 | 12 Mar 2012 | $38k | 2 | 2.13% | #11-04 | 592 | $1,554 | $0.920m |
| 26 | 24 Feb 2012 | $286k | 2.7 | 10.12% | #09-06 | 775 | $1,626 | $1.260m |
| 25 | 10 Feb 2012 | $156k | 2.6 | 7.55% | #03-05 | 592 | $1,500 | $0.888m |
| 24 | 14 Dec 2011 | $215k | 2.5 | 8.16% | #09-07 | 775 | $1,587 | $1.230m |
| 23 | 12 Oct 2011 | $116k | 1.7 | 7.53% | #06-01 | 592 | $1,655 | $0.980m |
| 22 | 5 Aug 2011 | $216k | 2.1 | 9.71% | #03-03 | 786 | $1,540 | $1.210m |
| 21 | 3 May 2011 | $258k | 1.8 | 13.96% | #03-07 | 775 | $1,561 | $1.210m |
| 20 | 13 Apr 2011 | $180k | 1.8 | 12.48% | #08-04 | 592 | $1,601 | $0.948m |
| 19 | 14 Jan 2011 | $120k | 1.5 | 9.52% | #09-04 | 592 | $1,579 | $0.935m |
| 18 | 8 Oct 2010 | $323k | 1.3 | 21.13% | #01-03 | 947 | $1,575 | $1.492m |
| 17 | 6 Sep 2010 | $118k | 1.2 | 11.8% | #05-08 | 592 | $1,584 | $0.938m |
| 16 | 28 Aug 2010 | $100k | 1.2 | 11.64% | #02-05 | 592 | $1,422 | $0.842m |
| 15 | 20 Aug 2010 | $165k | 1.1 | 14.23% | #07-03 | 786 | $1,490 | $1.171m |
| 14 | 3 Aug 2010 | $135k | 1.1 | 15.01% | #09-01 | 592 | $1,622 | $0.960m |
| 13 | 11 May 2010 | $215k | 0.9 | 32.44% | #08-08 | 592 | $1,669 | $0.988m |
| 12 | 9 Apr 2010 | $163k | 0.8 | 26.99% | #11-05 | 592 | $1,600 | $0.947m |
| 11 | 12 Mar 2010 | $114k | 0.7 | 21.92% | #11-04 | 592 | $1,490 | $0.882m |
| 10 | 2 Feb 2010 | $48k | 0.6 | 10.87% | #04-04 | 592 | $1,351 | $0.800m |
| 9 | 29 Jan 2010 | $115k | 0.6 | 20.92% | #08-03 | 775 | $1,471 | $1.140m |
| 8 | 19 Jan 2010 | $128k | 0.6 | 32.75% | #06-01 | 592 | $1,460 | $0.864m |
| 7 | 6 Jan 2010 | $81k | 0.5 | 22.16% | #03-01 | 592 | $1,365 | $0.808m |
| 6 | 7 Aug 2009 | $141k | 0.1 | 392.19% | #05-02 | 775 | $1,419 | $1.100m |
| 5 | 3 Aug 2009 | $83k | 0.1 | 199.78% | #10-08 | 592 | $1,427 | $0.845m |
| 4 | 17 Jul 2009 | $91k | 0 | 999% | #11-02 | 786 | $1,395 | $1.096m |
| 3 | 10 Jul 2009 | $55k | 0.1 | 240.62% | #09-04 | 592 | $1,377 | $0.815m |
| 2 | 3 Jul 2009 | $81k | 0 | 999% | #09-01 | 592 | $1,394 | $0.825m |
| 1 | 23 Jun 2009 | $107k | 0 | 999% | #10-02 | 786 | $1,410 | $1.108m |