The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
Nassim Park Residences Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D10 ≫ Nassim Park Residences ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 51 |
| Number of unprofitable | 17 |
| Highest Profit | $7,264,000 |
| Longest Held | 15.2 years |
| Highest Annualized | 999% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68 | 26 Jul 2024 | $4,391k | 14.7 | 2.55% | #04-05 | 3,175 | $4,472 | $14.200m |
| 67 | 5 Sep 2023 | $3,993k | 15.2 | 2.24% | #04-09 | 3,477 | $4,027 | $14.000m |
| 66 | 27 Mar 2023 | $7,264k | 14.8 | 2.75% | #01-20 | 4,822 | $4,562 | $22.000m |
| 65 | 27 Feb 2023 | $6,500k | 13.4 | 2.88% | #02-21 | 4,284 | $4,785 | $20.500m |
| 64 | 9 Jun 2022 | $1,723k | 4.5 | 3.23% | #02-02 | 3,175 | $4,059 | $12.888m |
| 63 | 10 May 2022 | $1,074k | 11.5 | 0.72% | #05-09 | 3,520 | $3,835 | $13.500m |
| 62 | 27 Apr 2022 | $2,314k | 13.8 | 1.4% | #05-08 | 3,509 | $3,762 | $13.200m |
| 61 | 6 Aug 2021 | $2,792k | 11.8 | 2.18% | #03-14 | 3,477 | $3,577 | $12.435m |
| 60 | 28 May 2021 | $3,163k | 12.9 | 1.89% | #01-13 | 4,833 | $3,042 | $14.700m |
| 59 | 16 Mar 2021 | -$120k | 11 | -0.08% | #01-11 | 4,822 | $2,837 | $13.680m |
| 58 | 10 Mar 2021 | $500k | 4.7 | 0.87% | #02-20 | 3,477 | $3,595 | $12.500m |
| 57 | 4 May 2020 | $254k | 11.9 | 0.2% | #03-12 | 3,466 | $3,058 | $10.600m |
| 56 | 28 Nov 2019 | $365k | 11.4 | 0.24% | #01-10 | 4,833 | $2,855 | $13.800m |
| 55 | 14 Aug 2019 | $775k | 9.4 | 0.72% | #04-13 | 3,477 | $3,408 | $11.850m |
| 54 | 22 May 2019 | -$5,312k | 8.1 | -3.01% | #05-14 | 6,953 | $2,704 | $18.800m |
| 53 | 13 Nov 2018 | -$1,400k | 7.3 | -1.69% | #02-13 | 3,477 | $3,049 | $10.600m |
| 52 | 29 Jun 2018 | $2,454k | 9.8 | 1.28% | #05-12 | 6,932 | $3,001 | $20.800m |
| 51 | 2 May 2018 | -$320k | 7.1 | -0.42% | #04-04 | 3,175 | $3,332 | $10.580m |
| 50 | 22 Jan 2018 | -$1,171k | 4.2 | -2.22% | #04-08 | 3,466 | $3,462 | $12.000m |
| 49 | 6 Dec 2017 | $545k | 9.4 | 0.53% | #02-02 | 3,175 | $3,516 | $11.165m |
| 48 | 23 Jan 2017 | $1,062k | 6.4 | 1.39% | #02-11 | 3,466 | $3,606 | $12.500m |
| 47 | 1 Jan 2017 | $1,000k | 6.8 | 0.71% | #05-13 | 6,953 | $3,020 | $21.000m |
| 46 | 23 Dec 2016 | $1,118k | 7.3 | 1.25% | #02-17 | 3,477 | $3,725 | $12.950m |
| 45 | 8 Dec 2016 | $400k | 7.1 | 0.56% | #04-12 | 3,466 | $3,001 | $10.400m |
| 44 | 3 Oct 2016 | -$2,310k | 8.1 | -1.27% | #05-18 | 6,878 | $3,082 | $21.200m |
| 43 | 30 Sep 2016 | $688k | 8.3 | 0.78% | #03-02 | 3,175 | $3,480 | $11.050m |
| 42 | 20 Jun 2016 | $188k | 5.5 | 0.28% | #04-20 | 3,477 | $3,523 | $12.250m |
| 41 | 20 Jun 2016 | -$663k | 4.9 | -1.09% | #02-20 | 3,477 | $3,452 | $12.000m |
| 40 | 10 May 2016 | -$1,182k | 4.6 | -2.17% | #03-04 | 3,175 | $3,527 | $11.200m |
| 39 | 1 Sep 2015 | $663k | 4.1 | 1.23% | #03-20 | 3,477 | $3,883 | $13.500m |
| 38 | 23 Apr 2015 | $2,058k | 6.6 | 1.46% | #05-20 | 6,878 | $3,271 | $22.500m |
| 37 | 12 Dec 2014 | $373k | 3.9 | 0.7% | #04-19 | 3,477 | $3,940 | $13.700m |
| 36 | 9 Oct 2014 | -$300k | 4.4 | -0.62% | #03-01 | 3,175 | $3,370 | $10.700m |
| 35 | 12 Dec 2013 | $1,895k | 5.5 | 3.2% | #02-09 | 3,477 | $3,452 | $12.000m |
| 34 | 28 Nov 2013 | $2,917k | 5.4 | 4.73% | #04-08 | 3,466 | $3,800 | $13.171m |
| 33 | 8 Oct 2012 | $2,100k | 3 | 6.61% | #02-15 | 3,466 | $3,462 | $12.000m |
| 32 | 14 Sep 2012 | $3,979k | 4 | 3.99% | #05-17 | 6,878 | $4,001 | $27.520m |
| 31 | 7 Sep 2012 | $1,139k | 4.1 | 2.61% | #04-11 | 3,466 | $3,260 | $11.300m |
| 30 | 11 Oct 2011 | $2,116k | 3.3 | 5.85% | #03-04 | 3,175 | $3,900 | $12.382m |
| 29 | 28 Jul 2011 | $1,664k | 3.1 | 5.03% | #03-10 | 3,477 | $3,400 | $11.822m |
| 28 | 26 Jul 2011 | $1,659k | 3 | 5.08% | #02-13 | 3,477 | $3,452 | $12.000m |
| 27 | 19 May 2011 | $1,018k | 2.9 | 3.27% | #04-02 | 3,175 | $3,600 | $11.430m |
| 26 | 15 Apr 2011 | $2,967k | 2.8 | 7.4% | #04-06 | 4,187 | $3,880 | $16.246m |
| 25 | 5 Apr 2011 | $6,197k | 2.7 | 11.71% | #05-14 | 6,953 | $3,468 | $24.111m |
| 24 | 5 Apr 2011 | $1,115k | 1.7 | 6.68% | #04-04 | 3,175 | $3,433 | $10.900m |
| 23 | 10 Mar 2011 | $3,440k | 2.8 | 9.51% | #01-01 | 4,575 | $3,400 | $15.555m |
| 22 | 4 Nov 2010 | $2,010k | 2.4 | 7.7% | #05-09 | 3,520 | $3,530 | $12.426m |
| 21 | 18 Aug 2010 | $393k | 2.2 | 1.61% | #05-01 | 3,218 | $3,600 | $11.585m |
| 20 | 16 Aug 2010 | $1,175k | 2.1 | 5.4% | #02-11 | 3,466 | $3,300 | $11.438m |
| 19 | 6 Aug 2010 | $1,659k | 2.1 | 5.38% | #05-06 | 4,381 | $3,600 | $15.772m |
| 18 | 7 Jun 2010 | $864k | 2 | 4.04% | #04-03 | 3,175 | $3,650 | $11.589m |
| 17 | 22 Apr 2010 | $1,904k | 1.8 | 9.61% | #05-10 | 3,520 | $3,500 | $12.320m |
| 16 | 5 Mar 2010 | $1,579k | 1.7 | 7.35% | #01-11 | 4,822 | $2,862 | $13.800m |
| 15 | 16 Dec 2009 | $310k | 1.5 | 1.63% | #01-12 | 5,231 | $2,485 | $13.000m |
| 14 | 22 Jun 2006 | $1,724k | 4.6 | 13.07% | #01-01 | 2,874 | $1,400 | $4.024m |
| 13 | 29 Jul 2003 | -$120k | 1.3 | -3.79% | #01-04 | 2,874 | $793 | $2.280m |
| 12 | 10 Mar 2003 | -$1,220k | 5.9 | -9.18% | #02-06 | 2,024 | $781 | $1.580m |
| 11 | 26 Jun 2002 | -$925k | 6.3 | -6.77% | #04-03 | 1,948 | $847 | $1.650m |
| 10 | 12 Mar 2002 | -$1,520k | 5.9 | -8.51% | #01-02 | 2,820 | $773 | $2.180m |
| 9 | 18 Aug 2001 | -$790k | 5.6 | -6.25% | #02-05 | 2,024 | $894 | $1.810m |
| 8 | 17 May 2001 | -$100k | 6 | -0.59% | #01-04 | 2,465 | $1,136 | $2.800m |
| 7 | 22 Jul 2000 | $198k | 0.5 | 34.28% | #01-02 | 1,173 | $1,294 | $1.518m |
| 6 | 1 Apr 2000 | $10k | 0.4 | 1.1% | #04-04 | 2,002 | $1,099 | $2.200m |
| 5 | 17 Dec 1999 | -$345k | 3.7 | -3.7% | #03-01 | 1,991 | $1,158 | $2.305m |
| 4 | 3 Dec 1999 | $300k | 0.1 | 999% | #01-04 | 1,173 | $1,347 | $1.580m |
| 3 | 1 Jul 1999 | -$50k | 3.2 | -0.97% | #03-04 | 1,238 | $1,252 | $1.550m |
| 2 | 24 Apr 1996 | $380k | 1 | 15.23% | #04-05 | 2,002 | $1,463 | $2.930m |
| 1 | 22 Feb 1996 | $160k | 0.1 | 86.97% | #04-03 | 1,948 | $1,322 | $2.575m |