The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
Nassim Jade Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D10 ≫ Nassim Jade ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 29 |
| Number of unprofitable | 11 |
| Highest Profit | $7,800,000 |
| Longest Held | 24.2 years |
| Highest Annualized | 154.2% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 | 6 Nov 2025 | $3,608k | 19.4 | 3.08% | #04-09 | 3,455 | $2,347 | $8.108m |
| 39 | 17 Nov 2023 | $7,800k | 11.6 | 6.4% | #04-07 | 5,748 | $2,644 | $15.200m |
| 38 | 27 Nov 2020 | $6,050k | 15.1 | 4.94% | #04-10 | 5,038 | $2,323 | $11.700m |
| 37 | 26 Aug 2020 | $450k | 11 | 0.8% | #03-06 | 2,153 | $2,485 | $5.350m |
| 36 | 14 Jul 2020 | -$50k | 10.1 | -0.12% | #02-05 | 1,841 | $2,282 | $4.200m |
| 35 | 1 Aug 2019 | -$361k | 24.2 | -0.27% | #04-03 | 3,208 | $1,652 | $5.300m |
| 34 | 15 May 2018 | -$384k | 11.1 | -0.56% | #04-08 | 3,272 | $1,834 | $6.000m |
| 33 | 31 Jul 2017 | -$250k | 6.2 | -0.92% | #01-05 | 1,841 | $2,309 | $4.250m |
| 32 | 12 Mar 2015 | -$50k | 4.1 | -0.25% | #03-07 | 2,325 | $2,086 | $4.850m |
| 31 | 16 Nov 2012 | $1,700k | 6.4 | 6.41% | #02-08 | 2,110 | $2,465 | $5.200m |
| 30 | 19 Apr 2012 | $188k | 4.8 | 0.75% | #01-03 | 2,250 | $2,334 | $5.250m |
| 29 | 5 Dec 2011 | $1,687k | 15.6 | 1.65% | #03-01 | 3,509 | $2,137 | $7.500m |
| 28 | 2 Dec 2011 | $300k | 2.2 | 2.74% | #02-02 | 2,260 | $2,345 | $5.300m |
| 27 | 27 Oct 2011 | $2,600k | 8.5 | 8.74% | #02-06 | 2,153 | $2,369 | $5.100m |
| 26 | 3 Jun 2011 | $1,150k | 15.6 | 1.91% | #01-05 | 1,841 | $2,445 | $4.500m |
| 25 | 2 Feb 2011 | $2,100k | 11.6 | 4.93% | #03-07 | 2,325 | $2,108 | $4.900m |
| 24 | 18 Jun 2010 | $1,370k | 10.9 | 3.62% | #02-05 | 1,841 | $2,309 | $4.250m |
| 23 | 3 Dec 2009 | $1,080k | 10 | 2.67% | #02-03 | 2,034 | $2,300 | $4.680m |
| 22 | 5 Oct 2009 | $1,800k | 3.3 | 14.42% | #02-02 | 2,260 | $2,212 | $5.000m |
| 21 | 11 Aug 2009 | $271k | 2.2 | 2.58% | #03-06 | 2,153 | $2,276 | $4.900m |
| 20 | 21 May 2007 | $1,000k | 1 | 35.25% | #02-04 | 1,927 | $1,998 | $3.850m |
| 19 | 16 May 2007 | $280k | 10 | 0.63% | #03-06 | 2,153 | $2,150 | $4.629m |
| 18 | 8 May 2007 | $100k | 10.8 | 0.17% | #04-04 | 3,003 | $1,831 | $5.500m |
| 17 | 30 Mar 2007 | $1,264k | 0.3 | 132.96% | #04-08 | 3,272 | $1,951 | $6.384m |
| 16 | 26 Dec 2006 | $385k | 11.7 | 0.67% | #04-08 | 3,272 | $1,565 | $5.120m |
| 15 | 3 Jul 2006 | $157k | 10.2 | 0.45% | #02-08 | 2,110 | $1,659 | $3.500m |
| 14 | 15 Jun 2006 | -$1,719k | 10.7 | -2.98% | #04-09 | 3,455 | $1,302 | $4.500m |
| 13 | 12 Jun 2006 | $650k | 0.2 | 154.2% | #02-02 | 2,260 | $1,416 | $3.200m |
| 12 | 22 May 2006 | -$619k | 10.1 | -1.92% | #02-04 | 1,927 | $1,479 | $2.850m |
| 11 | 24 Apr 2003 | -$1,483k | 7 | -6.45% | #02-06 | 2,153 | $1,161 | $2.500m |
| 10 | 15 Aug 2001 | -$1,082k | 5.5 | -5.8% | #03-08 | 2,110 | $1,327 | $2.800m |
| 9 | 15 Dec 1999 | $295k | 4.6 | 1.87% | #02-03 | 2,034 | $1,770 | $3.600m |
| 8 | 1 Dec 1999 | -$1,004k | 3.6 | -8.2% | #01-04 | 2,067 | $1,365 | $2.820m |
| 7 | 23 Sep 1999 | $1,099k | 0.6 | 86.3% | #03-09 | 2,260 | $1,606 | $3.630m |
| 6 | 16 Jun 1999 | -$1,804k | 3 | -15.21% | #03-07 | 2,325 | $1,204 | $2.800m |
| 5 | 1 Aug 1996 | $688k | 1.2 | 11.52% | #04-04 | 3,003 | $1,798 | $5.400m |
| 4 | 1 May 1996 | $489k | 1.1 | 12.17% | #03-02 | 2,260 | $1,850 | $4.181m |
| 3 | 4 Apr 1996 | $243k | 0.9 | 8.18% | #02-04 | 1,927 | $1,800 | $3.469m |
| 2 | 2 Oct 1995 | $820k | 0.5 | 32.5% | #04-09 | 3,455 | $1,800 | $6.219m |
| 1 | 1 Jun 1995 | $462k | 0.2 | 121.14% | #03-03 | 2,034 | $1,831 | $3.725m |