The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
Melrose Park Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D10 ≫ Melrose Park ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 67 |
| Number of unprofitable | 15 |
| Highest Profit | $3,088,800 |
| Longest Held | 24.6 years |
| Highest Annualized | 63.72% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82 | 25 Apr 2022 | $3,000k | 24.6 | 2.35% | #18-02 | 3,315 | $2,081 | $6.900m |
| 81 | 3 Nov 2021 | $1,500k | 20.8 | 3.31% | #09-06 | 1,292 | $2,361 | $3.050m |
| 80 | 21 Sep 2021 | $3,089k | 22.2 | 2.46% | #19-01 | 5,231 | $1,412 | $7.389m |
| 79 | 1 Sep 2021 | $885k | 9.4 | 3.58% | #05-04 | 1,345 | $2,341 | $3.150m |
| 78 | 18 Nov 2020 | $1,830k | 18.5 | 4.69% | #07-05 | 1,464 | $2,186 | $3.200m |
| 77 | 19 Oct 2020 | $780k | 10.6 | 2.76% | #04-02 | 1,507 | $2,057 | $3.100m |
| 76 | 29 May 2019 | $1,000k | 17.2 | 3.02% | #02-05 | 1,464 | $1,708 | $2.500m |
| 75 | 9 Apr 2018 | $676k | 8.1 | 3.83% | #15-03 | 1,345 | $1,903 | $2.560m |
| 74 | 4 Dec 2017 | $971k | 17.6 | 3.08% | #03-01 | 1,313 | $1,790 | $2.350m |
| 73 | 17 Nov 2017 | $170k | 4.4 | 1.65% | #12-01 | 1,313 | $1,866 | $2.450m |
| 72 | 3 Jul 2017 | $461k | 19.6 | 1.11% | #10-04 | 1,550 | $1,530 | $2.372m |
| 71 | 30 Jun 2017 | $180k | 9.1 | 0.74% | #14-01 | 1,701 | $1,646 | $2.800m |
| 70 | 22 May 2017 | $856k | 15.6 | 2.6% | #12-04 | 1,550 | $1,677 | $2.600m |
| 69 | 23 Mar 2017 | $980k | 10.8 | 5.68% | #02-01 | 1,313 | $1,660 | $2.180m |
| 68 | 27 Feb 2017 | $660k | 19.3 | 1.52% | #10-03 | 1,701 | $1,535 | $2.610m |
| 67 | 29 Dec 2016 | $548k | 16.3 | 1.82% | #12-06 | 1,292 | $1,665 | $2.150m |
| 66 | 11 Jul 2016 | $80k | 4.6 | 0.79% | #03-06 | 1,292 | $1,726 | $2.230m |
| 65 | 5 May 2016 | $760k | 12.9 | 3.39% | #08-03 | 1,345 | $1,620 | $2.180m |
| 64 | 23 Oct 2015 | $1,100k | 14 | 2.48% | #19-01 | 3,800 | $1,000 | $3.800m |
| 63 | 2 Jun 2015 | $870k | 14.2 | 3.3% | #05-02 | 1,507 | $1,559 | $2.350m |
| 62 | 2 Jun 2015 | -$368k | 7.8 | -2.35% | #09-03 | 1,345 | $1,338 | $1.800m |
| 61 | 22 Jan 2015 | $568k | 5.6 | 4.52% | #02-02 | 1,701 | $1,522 | $2.588m |
| 60 | 15 Jan 2015 | $815k | 10.2 | 5.08% | #10-06 | 1,292 | $1,595 | $2.060m |
| 59 | 28 Nov 2014 | $1,100k | 15.6 | 3.5% | #05-02 | 1,701 | $1,558 | $2.650m |
| 58 | 25 Aug 2014 | $24k | 4.3 | 0.23% | #02-04 | 1,550 | $1,516 | $2.350m |
| 57 | 2 Jul 2013 | $1,400k | 7.1 | 8.86% | #09-01 | 1,701 | $1,823 | $3.100m |
| 56 | 25 Jun 2013 | $630k | 3.9 | 8.55% | #12-01 | 1,313 | $1,736 | $2.280m |
| 55 | 21 Sep 2012 | $1,350k | 6.3 | 5.04% | #17-02 | 3,315 | $1,523 | $5.050m |
| 54 | 7 May 2012 | $1,100k | 10.4 | 2.73% | #19-02 | 4,575 | $984 | $4.500m |
| 53 | 6 Dec 2011 | $1,267k | 12.8 | 4.68% | #15-01 | 1,701 | $1,685 | $2.866m |
| 52 | 22 Nov 2011 | $960k | 12.7 | 4.78% | #03-06 | 1,292 | $1,665 | $2.150m |
| 51 | 7 Jun 2011 | $276k | 4 | 2.73% | #02-01 | 1,701 | $1,588 | $2.700m |
| 50 | 20 May 2011 | $2,418k | 12.1 | 5.8% | #17-05 | 2,863 | $1,704 | $4.880m |
| 49 | 11 May 2011 | $557k | 13.7 | 2.05% | #09-01 | 1,313 | $1,751 | $2.300m |
| 48 | 11 Apr 2011 | $652k | 8.5 | 4.71% | #04-06 | 1,292 | $1,564 | $2.020m |
| 47 | 7 Jan 2011 | $1,097k | 11.8 | 4.65% | #04-03 | 1,701 | $1,558 | $2.650m |
| 46 | 29 Dec 2010 | $362k | 13.2 | 1.52% | #07-01 | 1,313 | $1,530 | $2.009m |
| 45 | 10 May 2010 | $910k | 11.1 | 4.57% | #02-04 | 1,550 | $1,501 | $2.326m |
| 44 | 18 Mar 2010 | $2,210k | 11 | 5.45% | #17-01 | 3,412 | $1,465 | $5.000m |
| 43 | 26 Feb 2010 | $880k | 3.9 | 12.97% | #04-02 | 1,507 | $1,540 | $2.320m |
| 42 | 18 Feb 2010 | $344k | 0.7 | 31.19% | #15-03 | 1,345 | $1,401 | $1.884m |
| 41 | 19 Jan 2010 | $242k | 2.7 | 4.6% | #03-05 | 1,464 | $1,421 | $2.080m |
| 40 | 19 Oct 2009 | $650k | 6.7 | 4.81% | #08-01 | 1,701 | $1,411 | $2.400m |
| 39 | 14 Oct 2009 | $57k | 9 | 0.38% | #16-01 | 1,313 | $1,300 | $1.707m |
| 38 | 15 Jul 2009 | -$32k | 11.7 | -0.16% | #12-01 | 1,313 | $1,256 | $1.650m |
| 37 | 15 Jun 2009 | $480k | 10.1 | 2.72% | #02-02 | 1,701 | $1,188 | $2.020m |
| 36 | 21 May 2009 | $222k | 3.7 | 4.29% | #15-03 | 1,345 | $1,145 | $1.540m |
| 35 | 16 Jul 2008 | $755k | 2.2 | 20.66% | #03-04 | 1,550 | $1,445 | $2.240m |
| 34 | 7 Apr 2008 | $3,000k | 6.1 | 11.45% | #19-04 | 4,402 | $1,408 | $6.200m |
| 33 | 13 Nov 2007 | $1,250k | 0.6 | 47.63% | #19-03 | 4,790 | $1,284 | $6.150m |
| 32 | 31 Jul 2007 | $438k | 0.5 | 63.72% | #09-03 | 1,345 | $1,611 | $2.168m |
| 31 | 5 Jun 2007 | $774k | 1.6 | 26.56% | #02-01 | 1,701 | $1,425 | $2.424m |
| 30 | 20 Apr 2007 | $488k | 8 | 3.95% | #03-05 | 1,464 | $1,256 | $1.838m |
| 29 | 13 Apr 2007 | -$468k | 9.5 | -0.95% | #19-03 | 4,790 | $1,023 | $4.900m |
| 28 | 16 Feb 2007 | $280k | 0.4 | 60.8% | #09-03 | 1,345 | $1,286 | $1.730m |
| 27 | 28 Dec 2006 | -$182k | 9.2 | -0.94% | #15-03 | 1,701 | $1,176 | $2.000m |
| 26 | 23 Nov 2006 | $203k | 1.2 | 13.14% | #02-04 | 1,345 | $1,055 | $1.420m |
| 25 | 31 May 2006 | -$87k | 6.2 | -1.13% | #02-01 | 1,313 | $914 | $1.200m |
| 24 | 10 May 2006 | $150k | 0.8 | 11.86% | #12-01 | 1,701 | $1,047 | $1.780m |
| 23 | 8 May 2006 | $238k | 7.8 | 2.27% | #03-04 | 1,550 | $958 | $1.485m |
| 22 | 28 Apr 2006 | $150k | 7 | 1.69% | #13-06 | 1,292 | $1,045 | $1.350m |
| 21 | 29 Mar 2006 | $37k | 6.9 | 0.38% | #04-02 | 1,507 | $956 | $1.440m |
| 20 | 23 Mar 2006 | $32k | 6.9 | 0.34% | #04-05 | 1,464 | $946 | $1.385m |
| 19 | 15 Mar 2006 | -$354k | 6.6 | -2.89% | #02-03 | 1,701 | $970 | $1.650m |
| 18 | 16 Feb 2006 | -$51k | 7.7 | -0.39% | #13-02 | 1,701 | $970 | $1.650m |
| 17 | 23 Jan 2006 | -$190k | 3.7 | -3.58% | #09-04 | 1,345 | $988 | $1.330m |
| 16 | 31 Oct 2005 | -$512k | 7.9 | -4.44% | #05-01 | 1,313 | $899 | $1.180m |
| 15 | 18 Oct 2005 | -$391k | 5.5 | -3.77% | #02-01 | 1,701 | $970 | $1.650m |
| 14 | 26 Sep 2005 | -$80k | 3.7 | -0.81% | #19-04 | 3,606 | $735 | $2.650m |
| 13 | 27 Jul 2005 | $184k | 6.1 | 1.98% | #12-01 | 1,701 | $958 | $1.630m |
| 12 | 17 Nov 2004 | $70k | 5.7 | 1.02% | #10-06 | 1,292 | $964 | $1.245m |
| 11 | 18 Aug 2003 | -$673k | 3.4 | -11.82% | #10-02 | 1,507 | $823 | $1.240m |
| 10 | 24 Oct 2002 | $12k | 2.3 | 0.38% | #04-06 | 1,292 | $1,059 | $1.368m |
| 9 | 13 May 2002 | $38k | 3.1 | 0.92% | #07-05 | 1,464 | $936 | $1.370m |
| 8 | 1 Apr 2002 | -$43k | 2.7 | -1.05% | #02-05 | 1,464 | $1,025 | $1.500m |
| 7 | 1 Feb 2001 | $378k | 1.9 | 15.55% | #09-06 | 1,292 | $1,200 | $1.550m |
| 6 | 1 Sep 2000 | $260k | 1.4 | 15.36% | #07-06 | 1,292 | $1,123 | $1.450m |
| 5 | 7 Jul 2000 | $450k | 1.3 | 24.96% | #14-05 | 1,464 | $1,250 | $1.830m |
| 4 | 30 Jun 2000 | $141k | 1.2 | 9.94% | #04-06 | 1,292 | $1,050 | $1.356m |
| 3 | 7 Jan 2000 | $40k | 2.1 | 0.97% | #09-03 | 1,701 | $1,164 | $1.980m |
| 2 | 1 Jul 1999 | -$205k | 1.7 | -6.51% | #09-04 | 1,550 | $1,100 | $1.705m |
| 1 | 1 Jun 1999 | -$260k | 1.6 | -8.14% | #12-03 | 1,701 | $1,047 | $1.780m |