The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
Holland Hill Park Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D10 ≫ Holland Hill Park ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 35 |
| Number of unprofitable | 9 |
| Highest Profit | $2,369,000 |
| Longest Held | 20.5 years |
| Highest Annualized | 999% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45 | 28 Apr 2024 | $2,369k | 17.4 | 6.11% | #01-06 | 2,056 | $1,790 | $3.680m |
| 44 | 28 Mar 2024 | $870k | 3.5 | 9.77% | #04-03 | 1,539 | $2,046 | $3.150m |
| 43 | 29 May 2023 | $1,200k | 13.7 | 3.72% | #01-02 | 1,830 | $1,667 | $3.050m |
| 42 | 15 Sep 2022 | $950k | 13.1 | 3.07% | #01-10 | 1,808 | $1,604 | $2.900m |
| 41 | 19 Feb 2021 | $550k | 13.7 | 1.88% | #02-04 | 1,625 | $1,507 | $2.450m |
| 40 | 5 Feb 2021 | $550k | 10.9 | 2.3% | #04-06 | 1,647 | $1,518 | $2.500m |
| 39 | 9 Oct 2020 | $1,120k | 13.7 | 5.06% | #04-03 | 1,539 | $1,481 | $2.280m |
| 38 | 8 Jun 2020 | $1,140k | 20.5 | 3.62% | #04-09 | 1,464 | $1,503 | $2.200m |
| 37 | 20 Aug 2019 | $400k | 9 | 2.38% | #04-02 | 1,421 | $1,478 | $2.100m |
| 36 | 29 Apr 2013 | $900k | 6.2 | 8.92% | #02-07 | 1,658 | $1,327 | $2.200m |
| 35 | 26 Mar 2012 | $320k | 2.2 | 9.21% | #04-08 | 1,410 | $1,312 | $1.850m |
| 34 | 21 Mar 2011 | $620k | 15.1 | 2.48% | #03-05 | 1,636 | $1,222 | $2.000m |
| 33 | 15 Oct 2010 | $0k | 2.3 | 0% | #04-07 | 1,658 | $1,207 | $2.000m |
| 32 | 3 Mar 2010 | $812k | 6.5 | 8.65% | #04-06 | 1,647 | $1,184 | $1.950m |
| 31 | 5 Feb 2010 | $340k | 2.7 | 7.1% | #01-04 | 1,765 | $1,133 | $2.000m |
| 30 | 17 Sep 2009 | $760k | 3.4 | 16.59% | #01-02 | 1,830 | $1,011 | $1.850m |
| 29 | 3 Aug 2009 | $50k | 2 | 1.31% | #01-10 | 1,808 | $1,078 | $1.950m |
| 28 | 13 Jul 2009 | -$180k | 1.9 | -5.31% | #01-09 | 1,636 | $990 | $1.620m |
| 27 | 2 Jul 2008 | $1,040k | 9.3 | 8.22% | #04-07 | 1,658 | $1,207 | $2.000m |
| 26 | 29 Oct 2007 | $1,076k | 8.7 | 10.62% | #02-02 | 1,421 | $1,299 | $1.846m |
| 25 | 23 Oct 2007 | $374k | 0.4 | 71.82% | #02-03 | 1,539 | $1,250 | $1.924m |
| 24 | 6 Aug 2007 | $700k | 4.3 | 11.14% | #01-10 | 1,808 | $1,051 | $1.900m |
| 23 | 6 Aug 2007 | $573k | 6.6 | 6% | #01-09 | 1,636 | $1,100 | $1.800m |
| 22 | 3 Aug 2007 | $520k | 0.3 | 160.99% | #01-05 | 1,808 | $1,161 | $2.100m |
| 21 | 19 Jun 2007 | $982k | 0.9 | 131.58% | #02-04 | 1,625 | $1,169 | $1.900m |
| 20 | 29 May 2007 | $140k | 11.1 | 0.85% | #02-03 | 1,539 | $1,007 | $1.550m |
| 19 | 18 May 2007 | $502k | 5.9 | 6.34% | #01-04 | 1,765 | $940 | $1.660m |
| 18 | 23 Apr 2007 | $362k | 8.8 | 4.18% | #02-01 | 1,410 | $851 | $1.200m |
| 17 | 17 Apr 2007 | $530k | 6.1 | 6.91% | #01-05 | 1,808 | $874 | $1.580m |
| 16 | 3 Apr 2007 | $580k | 3.6 | 13.53% | #01-07 | 2,013 | $785 | $1.580m |
| 15 | 2 Mar 2007 | -$250k | 10.7 | -1.63% | #02-07 | 1,658 | $784 | $1.300m |
| 14 | 1 Feb 2007 | $260k | 4.5 | 5.8% | #04-03 | 1,539 | $754 | $1.160m |
| 13 | 8 Jan 2007 | $100k | 5 | 1.9% | #01-01 | 1,787 | $621 | $1.110m |
| 12 | 5 Dec 2006 | $361k | 2 | 17.4% | #01-06 | 2,056 | $638 | $1.311m |
| 11 | 6 Apr 2006 | $172k | 2 | 8.95% | #01-02 | 1,830 | $596 | $1.090m |
| 10 | 19 Apr 2004 | -$38k | 2.8 | -1.44% | #03-02 | 1,410 | $652 | $0.920m |
| 9 | 4 Sep 2003 | -$12k | 1.4 | -0.73% | #04-06 | 1,647 | $691 | $1.138m |
| 8 | 26 Aug 2003 | -$500k | 3.4 | -11.11% | #01-07 | 2,013 | $497 | $1.000m |
| 7 | 31 Mar 2003 | -$200k | 6.5 | -2.33% | #01-10 | 1,808 | $664 | $1.200m |
| 6 | 1 Apr 2002 | -$335k | 6.8 | -3.67% | #04-06 | 1,647 | $698 | $1.150m |
| 5 | 9 Jan 2001 | -$523k | 4.4 | -7.67% | #01-09 | 1,636 | $750 | $1.227m |
| 4 | 17 Mar 2000 | -$260k | 3.9 | -3.97% | #01-07 | 2,013 | $745 | $1.500m |
| 3 | 14 May 1996 | $390k | 0.5 | 63.78% | #03-04 | 1,636 | $1,008 | $1.650m |
| 2 | 8 Apr 1996 | $160k | 0 | 999% | #01-07 | 2,013 | $874 | $1.760m |
| 1 | 29 Jan 1996 | $160k | 0.6 | 23.82% | #03-05 | 1,636 | $843 | $1.380m |