The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
Gloucester Mansions Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D11 ≫ Gloucester Mansions ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 47 |
| Number of unprofitable | 17 |
| Highest Profit | $1,260,000 |
| Longest Held | 23.6 years |
| Highest Annualized | 372.62% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64 | 28 Nov 2023 | $340k | 12.9 | 2.34% | #11-03 | 657 | $2,010 | $1.320m |
| 63 | 31 May 2023 | $550k | 7.3 | 4.9% | #02-01 | 915 | $2,033 | $1.860m |
| 62 | 9 May 2023 | $550k | 9.6 | 2.9% | #13-04 | 1,130 | $2,035 | $2.300m |
| 61 | 17 Sep 2021 | $200k | 8 | 2.3% | #08-03 | 657 | $1,828 | $1.200m |
| 60 | 13 Sep 2021 | $156k | 7.3 | 1.99% | #10-03 | 657 | $1,773 | $1.164m |
| 59 | 24 Aug 2021 | $1,260k | 18.6 | 4.8% | #09-02 | 1,163 | $1,867 | $2.170m |
| 58 | 9 Apr 2021 | $311k | 23.6 | 0.95% | #04-01 | 904 | $1,718 | $1.553m |
| 57 | 8 Jan 2021 | $163k | 10 | 1.55% | #13-03 | 657 | $1,740 | $1.143m |
| 56 | 28 Feb 2020 | $328k | 8.9 | 1.17% | #16-01 | 2,045 | $1,632 | $3.338m |
| 55 | 30 Jan 2020 | $125k | 6.6 | 1.26% | #10-01 | 883 | $1,790 | $1.580m |
| 54 | 20 Nov 2019 | $128k | 7.5 | 1.19% | #06-01 | 893 | $1,688 | $1.508m |
| 53 | 19 Jul 2019 | $202k | 9.2 | 2.23% | #09-03 | 657 | $1,675 | $1.100m |
| 52 | 3 Jun 2019 | $1,013k | 21.8 | 1.58% | #17-01 | 2,045 | $1,711 | $3.500m |
| 51 | 2 Apr 2018 | $588k | 20.6 | 1.05% | #15-01 | 2,045 | $1,481 | $3.028m |
| 50 | 3 Aug 2017 | -$15k | 19.9 | -0.08% | #16-03 | 657 | $1,447 | $0.950m |
| 49 | 13 Dec 2016 | $800k | 12.9 | 5.67% | #07-04 | 1,141 | $1,376 | $1.570m |
| 48 | 6 Jun 2016 | $227k | 16.7 | 1.52% | #04-03 | 678 | $1,504 | $1.020m |
| 47 | 15 Apr 2016 | $80k | 18.6 | 0.27% | #15-04 | 1,130 | $1,433 | $1.620m |
| 46 | 1 Feb 2016 | $260k | 15.6 | 1.43% | #02-01 | 915 | $1,432 | $1.310m |
| 45 | 24 Feb 2015 | $34k | 17.5 | 0.2% | #18-03 | 657 | $1,538 | $1.010m |
| 44 | 5 Nov 2014 | $580k | 5.3 | 7.77% | #18-04 | 1,130 | $1,575 | $1.780m |
| 43 | 21 May 2014 | $20k | 3.2 | 0.63% | #10-03 | 657 | $1,535 | $1.008m |
| 42 | 17 Oct 2013 | $225k | 16 | 0.87% | #13-04 | 1,130 | $1,548 | $1.750m |
| 41 | 16 Sep 2013 | $355k | 12.2 | 3.67% | #08-03 | 657 | $1,523 | $1.000m |
| 40 | 5 Jul 2013 | $800k | 7.9 | 10.62% | #10-01 | 883 | $1,648 | $1.455m |
| 39 | 2 May 2013 | $372k | 15.7 | 0.91% | #13-01 | 2,045 | $1,379 | $2.820m |
| 38 | 20 Dec 2012 | $407k | 15.3 | 1% | #14-01 | 2,045 | $1,400 | $2.863m |
| 37 | 12 Dec 2012 | $130k | 1.9 | 6.52% | #17-03 | 657 | $1,721 | $1.130m |
| 36 | 25 May 2012 | $150k | 4.4 | 2.67% | #06-01 | 893 | $1,545 | $1.380m |
| 35 | 16 May 2012 | $310k | 12.6 | 2.67% | #03-03 | 678 | $1,622 | $1.100m |
| 34 | 23 Sep 2011 | $410k | 2.4 | 13.23% | #04-02 | 1,184 | $1,360 | $1.610m |
| 33 | 21 Sep 2011 | $520k | 2.4 | 22.1% | #05-01 | 893 | $1,522 | $1.360m |
| 32 | 5 Jul 2011 | $130k | 13.9 | 0.6% | #09-04 | 1,130 | $1,442 | $1.630m |
| 31 | 4 Jul 2011 | $178k | 1.2 | 11.93% | #11-01 | 883 | $1,561 | $1.378m |
| 30 | 28 Jun 2011 | $22k | 13.8 | 0.1% | #02-02 | 1,184 | $1,318 | $1.560m |
| 29 | 15 Apr 2011 | $533k | 13.6 | 1.44% | #16-01 | 2,045 | $1,472 | $3.010m |
| 28 | 4 Mar 2011 | $347k | 13.5 | 3.25% | #10-03 | 657 | $1,505 | $0.988m |
| 27 | 14 Jan 2011 | $345k | 1.8 | 27.89% | #13-03 | 657 | $1,493 | $0.980m |
| 26 | 5 Jan 2011 | $320k | 4.2 | 9.61% | #17-03 | 657 | $1,523 | $1.000m |
| 25 | 4 Jan 2011 | $35k | 13.3 | 0.27% | #11-03 | 657 | $1,493 | $0.980m |
| 24 | 1 Jun 2010 | -$29k | 12.7 | -0.24% | #12-03 | 657 | $1,401 | $0.920m |
| 23 | 5 May 2010 | $383k | 5.1 | 11.51% | #09-03 | 657 | $1,368 | $0.898m |
| 22 | 12 Apr 2010 | $400k | 7.7 | 5.42% | #11-01 | 883 | $1,360 | $1.200m |
| 21 | 24 Aug 2009 | $305k | 2.6 | 12.12% | #07-01 | 893 | $1,315 | $1.175m |
| 20 | 29 Jul 2009 | -$365k | 11.9 | -2.21% | #18-04 | 1,130 | $1,062 | $1.200m |
| 19 | 11 May 2009 | $362k | 2.9 | 13.26% | #04-02 | 1,184 | $1,013 | $1.200m |
| 18 | 23 Apr 2009 | $40k | 7.2 | 0.68% | #05-01 | 893 | $940 | $0.840m |
| 17 | 9 Apr 2009 | -$305k | 11.6 | -3.33% | #13-03 | 657 | $967 | $0.635m |
| 16 | 10 Jul 2007 | $300k | 6 | 6.1% | #02-03 | 678 | $1,475 | $1.000m |
| 15 | 5 Jul 2007 | $190k | 0.2 | 160.04% | #04-04 | 1,152 | $1,042 | $1.200m |
| 14 | 30 Apr 2007 | -$240k | 7.8 | -2.71% | #04-04 | 1,152 | $877 | $1.010m |
| 13 | 8 Jan 2007 | -$367k | 9.4 | -3.69% | #07-01 | 893 | $974 | $0.870m |
| 12 | 23 Oct 2006 | $105k | 0.1 | 372.62% | #17-03 | 657 | $1,036 | $0.680m |
| 11 | 14 Sep 2006 | -$395k | 9 | -5.63% | #17-03 | 657 | $876 | $0.575m |
| 10 | 8 Aug 2005 | -$581k | 7.6 | -8.01% | #10-01 | 883 | $742 | $0.655m |
| 9 | 1 Aug 2005 | -$180k | 3.6 | -6.04% | #06-02 | 1,163 | $619 | $0.720m |
| 8 | 28 Mar 2005 | -$265k | 5.5 | -7.31% | #09-03 | 657 | $784 | $0.515m |
| 7 | 19 Jul 2004 | -$335k | 4.5 | -10.7% | #07-03 | 667 | $757 | $0.505m |
| 6 | 9 Jan 2004 | -$705k | 6.1 | -10.14% | #07-04 | 1,141 | $675 | $0.770m |
| 5 | 5 Feb 2003 | -$633k | 5.4 | -9.27% | #09-02 | 1,163 | $783 | $0.910m |
| 4 | 8 Aug 2002 | -$441k | 4.9 | -8.51% | #11-01 | 883 | $906 | $0.800m |
| 3 | 1 Feb 2002 | -$430k | 4.5 | -9.17% | #05-01 | 893 | $895 | $0.800m |
| 2 | 1 Jan 2002 | -$626k | 4.3 | -11.47% | #06-02 | 1,163 | $774 | $0.900m |
| 1 | 12 Jul 2001 | -$290k | 3.9 | -9.12% | #08-03 | 657 | $982 | $0.645m |