The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
Dormer Park Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D10 ≫ Dormer Park ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 47 |
| Number of unprofitable | 15 |
| Highest Profit | $2,380,000 |
| Longest Held | 24.4 years |
| Highest Annualized | 55.66% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62 | 5 Jun 2024 | $1,580k | 17 | 3.74% | #04-04 | 1,668 | $2,038 | $3.400m |
| 61 | 28 Aug 2023 | $1,920k | 17.1 | 5.43% | #03-04 | 1,668 | $1,930 | $3.220m |
| 60 | 19 Jul 2023 | $962k | 12.1 | 2.83% | #04-04 | 1,668 | $2,008 | $3.350m |
| 59 | 6 May 2022 | $1,725k | 15.5 | 5.33% | #01-04 | 1,668 | $1,873 | $3.125m |
| 58 | 2 Dec 2021 | $1,750k | 14.8 | 3.66% | #08-04 | 2,465 | $1,724 | $4.250m |
| 57 | 14 Oct 2021 | $890k | 12.1 | 4.27% | #04-05 | 1,238 | $1,810 | $2.240m |
| 56 | 17 Sep 2021 | $550k | 9 | 3.17% | #02-02 | 1,238 | $1,818 | $2.250m |
| 55 | 12 May 2021 | $2,150k | 20.8 | 3.71% | #10-02 | 2,347 | $1,726 | $4.050m |
| 54 | 12 Apr 2021 | $920k | 24.4 | 2.17% | #03-01 | 1,249 | $1,802 | $2.250m |
| 53 | 9 Dec 2020 | $400k | 8 | 1.87% | #03-01 | 1,668 | $1,738 | $2.900m |
| 52 | 25 Feb 2020 | $2,030k | 16.7 | 5.58% | #02-02 | 2,347 | $1,449 | $3.400m |
| 51 | 9 Jan 2020 | $270k | 7.2 | 1.44% | #04-06 | 1,679 | $1,638 | $2.750m |
| 50 | 6 Mar 2019 | $300k | 8.6 | 1.01% | #08-02 | 2,347 | $1,555 | $3.650m |
| 49 | 18 Jun 2018 | $920k | 22.2 | 1.99% | #01-01 | 1,658 | $1,568 | $2.600m |
| 48 | 22 Jan 2018 | $1,120k | 11.2 | 5.14% | #02-06 | 1,668 | $1,558 | $2.600m |
| 47 | 2 Jan 2018 | $1,217k | 15.7 | 6.04% | #10-01 | 1,249 | $1,622 | $2.025m |
| 46 | 22 Jan 2015 | $870k | 5.1 | 5.75% | #05-02 | 2,347 | $1,492 | $3.500m |
| 45 | 18 Sep 2014 | $2,035k | 10.6 | 9.02% | #05-03 | 2,540 | $1,338 | $3.400m |
| 44 | 18 Jun 2014 | $1,150k | 8 | 8.5% | #04-05 | 1,690 | $1,420 | $2.400m |
| 43 | 29 Jul 2013 | $1,500k | 11.1 | 8.33% | #03-04 | 1,668 | $1,528 | $2.550m |
| 42 | 19 Jul 2013 | $300k | 3.8 | 4.88% | #01-08 | 1,270 | $1,417 | $1.800m |
| 41 | 31 May 2013 | $415k | 6 | 4.22% | #03-02 | 1,238 | $1,523 | $1.885m |
| 40 | 29 Nov 2012 | $750k | 15.6 | 2.31% | #03-01 | 1,668 | $1,498 | $2.500m |
| 39 | 24 Jun 2012 | $925k | 7 | 11.56% | #05-01 | 1,249 | $1,382 | $1.725m |
| 38 | 26 Sep 2011 | $480k | 4.4 | 6.88% | #03-07 | 1,270 | $1,480 | $1.880m |
| 37 | 28 Jul 2011 | $738k | 4.4 | 12.66% | #03-05 | 1,238 | $1,469 | $1.818m |
| 36 | 3 Jun 2011 | $1,088k | 11.2 | 5.6% | #04-04 | 1,668 | $1,431 | $2.388m |
| 35 | 3 May 2011 | $1,048k | 6.8 | 13.22% | #02-08 | 1,270 | $1,449 | $1.840m |
| 34 | 21 Dec 2010 | $2,380k | 7.6 | 15.41% | #07-02 | 2,347 | $1,526 | $3.580m |
| 33 | 3 Sep 2010 | $480k | 14.7 | 2.31% | #02-05 | 1,238 | $1,357 | $1.680m |
| 32 | 22 Jan 2010 | $222k | 2.7 | 4.66% | #03-01 | 1,658 | $1,176 | $1.950m |
| 31 | 11 Dec 2009 | $230k | 12.6 | 0.73% | #05-02 | 2,347 | $1,121 | $2.630m |
| 30 | 22 Sep 2009 | $660k | 7.1 | 8.57% | #01-08 | 1,270 | $1,181 | $1.500m |
| 29 | 8 Sep 2009 | -$70k | 11.9 | -0.42% | #04-05 | 1,238 | $1,091 | $1.350m |
| 28 | 5 Jun 2009 | $468k | 6.7 | 5.03% | #04-01 | 1,668 | $1,000 | $1.668m |
| 27 | 28 May 2007 | $728k | 5.5 | 10.49% | #03-01 | 1,658 | $1,042 | $1.728m |
| 26 | 25 May 2007 | $855k | 5.5 | 12.31% | #04-04 | 1,668 | $1,091 | $1.820m |
| 25 | 23 May 2007 | $450k | 7.9 | 4.76% | #03-02 | 1,238 | $1,188 | $1.470m |
| 24 | 20 Apr 2007 | $620k | 4.4 | 14.23% | #03-07 | 1,270 | $1,102 | $1.400m |
| 23 | 15 Mar 2007 | $320k | 5.1 | 7.08% | #03-05 | 1,238 | $872 | $1.080m |
| 22 | 21 Feb 2007 | $1,000k | 1.4 | 45.89% | #08-04 | 2,465 | $1,014 | $2.500m |
| 21 | 26 Sep 2006 | $82k | 6.8 | 0.89% | #02-04 | 1,668 | $839 | $1.400m |
| 20 | 1 Sep 2006 | $850k | 3.7 | 13.51% | #07-04 | 2,465 | $913 | $2.250m |
| 19 | 5 Jul 2006 | $100k | 5.7 | 1.42% | #03-04 | 1,668 | $779 | $1.300m |
| 18 | 19 Jun 2006 | -$270k | 6.3 | -3.06% | #04-05 | 1,690 | $740 | $1.250m |
| 17 | 5 Jun 2006 | $610k | 1.9 | 22.96% | #03-02 | 2,347 | $788 | $1.850m |
| 16 | 27 Oct 2005 | -$75k | 4.5 | -1.52% | #03-06 | 1,679 | $631 | $1.060m |
| 15 | 14 Oct 2005 | -$150k | 7.4 | -1.28% | #08-04 | 2,465 | $609 | $1.500m |
| 14 | 16 Jun 2005 | -$530k | 9.3 | -5.31% | #05-01 | 1,249 | $641 | $0.800m |
| 13 | 12 Apr 2004 | -$465k | 8.4 | -5.37% | #06-01 | 1,249 | $633 | $0.790m |
| 12 | 4 Mar 2004 | -$560k | 8.7 | -5.33% | #01-06 | 1,679 | $548 | $0.920m |
| 11 | 22 Oct 2003 | -$65k | 1.2 | -5.42% | #04-03 | 1,668 | $566 | $0.945m |
| 10 | 27 May 2003 | -$618k | 7.7 | -4.71% | #02-02 | 2,347 | $584 | $1.370m |
| 9 | 11 Feb 2003 | -$250k | 3.4 | -6.74% | #01-04 | 1,668 | $557 | $0.930m |
| 8 | 4 Dec 2002 | -$250k | 3.6 | -4.5% | #07-04 | 2,465 | $568 | $1.400m |
| 7 | 28 Nov 2002 | -$745k | 6.7 | -9.49% | #03-07 | 1,270 | $614 | $0.780m |
| 6 | 2 Sep 2002 | -$80k | 3.4 | -2.65% | #01-08 | 1,270 | $661 | $0.840m |
| 5 | 28 Jun 2002 | -$630k | 6 | -7.48% | #03-04 | 1,668 | $629 | $1.050m |
| 4 | 17 Jan 2000 | -$275k | 4.1 | -5.67% | #01-02 | 1,238 | $812 | $1.005m |
| 3 | 1 May 1997 | $447k | 1.1 | 21.52% | #05-02 | 2,347 | $1,023 | $2.400m |
| 2 | 19 Apr 1996 | $60k | 0.1 | 55.66% | #01-01 | 1,658 | $1,013 | $1.680m |
| 1 | 7 Mar 1996 | $145k | 0.5 | 24.23% | #03-07 | 1,270 | $1,201 | $1.525m |