The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
City Regency Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D12 ≫ City Regency ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 60 |
| Number of unprofitable | 6 |
| Highest Profit | $780,000 |
| Longest Held | 14.7 years |
| Highest Annualized | 63.39% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 66 | 24 Nov 2023 | $67k | 5.2 | 1.89% | #04-02 | 484 | $1,486 | $0.720m |
| 65 | 28 Jul 2023 | $147k | 3.8 | 5.79% | #07-04 | 517 | $1,465 | $0.757m |
| 64 | 19 Jun 2023 | $780k | 13.4 | 3.81% | #15-03 | 1,701 | $1,164 | $1.980m |
| 63 | 29 Dec 2022 | $240k | 12 | 1.89% | #11-01 | 850 | $1,405 | $1.195m |
| 62 | 5 Aug 2022 | $27k | 4.3 | 0.92% | #08-04 | 517 | $1,365 | $0.705m |
| 61 | 5 Jun 2022 | -$7k | 9.2 | -0.11% | #03-02 | 484 | $1,389 | $0.673m |
| 60 | 18 Oct 2021 | $526k | 14.7 | 4.59% | #14-01 | 850 | $1,279 | $1.088m |
| 59 | 3 Aug 2021 | $40k | 10.6 | 0.59% | #02-02 | 484 | $1,363 | $0.660m |
| 58 | 4 Sep 2020 | -$23k | 8 | -0.45% | #11-02 | 484 | $1,311 | $0.635m |
| 57 | 26 Sep 2019 | $120k | 10.9 | 2.03% | #07-04 | 517 | $1,181 | $0.610m |
| 56 | 30 May 2019 | -$80k | 6 | -1.07% | #08-03 | 990 | $1,212 | $1.200m |
| 55 | 12 Dec 2018 | -$253k | 5.7 | -3.31% | #04-03 | 990 | $1,209 | $1.197m |
| 54 | 1 Oct 2018 | $110k | 2 | 4.87% | #13-03 | 990 | $1,212 | $1.200m |
| 53 | 6 Sep 2018 | $3k | 7 | 0.07% | #04-02 | 484 | $1,348 | $0.653m |
| 52 | 10 Jul 2018 | -$22k | 6.9 | -0.46% | #11-04 | 517 | $1,326 | $0.685m |
| 51 | 20 Jun 2018 | $70k | 5.2 | 1.24% | #05-03 | 990 | $1,141 | $1.130m |
| 50 | 3 May 2018 | $38k | 7.9 | 0.73% | #08-04 | 517 | $1,312 | $0.678m |
| 49 | 11 Sep 2017 | $503k | 10.9 | 5.87% | #06-03 | 990 | $1,096 | $1.085m |
| 48 | 5 Sep 2017 | $266k | 10.5 | 5.1% | #06-04 | 517 | $1,268 | $0.655m |
| 47 | 23 Sep 2016 | $270k | 6.8 | 4.27% | #13-03 | 990 | $1,101 | $1.090m |
| 46 | 15 Jun 2015 | $48k | 4.3 | 1.61% | #09-04 | 517 | $1,409 | $0.728m |
| 45 | 28 Nov 2014 | $170k | 4.6 | 3.53% | #14-03 | 990 | $1,161 | $1.150m |
| 44 | 12 Aug 2013 | $420k | 3.9 | 13.31% | #05-01 | 850 | $1,270 | $1.080m |
| 43 | 23 May 2013 | $691k | 6.6 | 12.45% | #08-03 | 990 | $1,293 | $1.280m |
| 42 | 7 May 2013 | $526k | 6.6 | 10.43% | #03-03 | 990 | $1,111 | $1.100m |
| 41 | 8 Apr 2013 | $480k | 6.5 | 9.67% | #05-03 | 990 | $1,070 | $1.060m |
| 40 | 4 Apr 2013 | $770k | 3.9 | 21.67% | #04-03 | 990 | $1,464 | $1.450m |
| 39 | 28 Mar 2013 | $220k | 4.8 | 8.27% | #10-02 | 484 | $1,435 | $0.695m |
| 38 | 22 Mar 2013 | $100k | 2.6 | 6.4% | #03-02 | 484 | $1,404 | $0.680m |
| 37 | 13 Mar 2013 | $205k | 3.6 | 10.1% | #13-02 | 484 | $1,445 | $0.700m |
| 36 | 14 Sep 2012 | $83k | 2.4 | 5.68% | #11-02 | 484 | $1,358 | $0.658m |
| 35 | 17 Aug 2012 | $330k | 3.1 | 11.32% | #15-01 | 1,410 | $823 | $1.160m |
| 34 | 2 Sep 2011 | $140k | 1.9 | 13.49% | #04-02 | 484 | $1,342 | $0.650m |
| 33 | 18 Aug 2011 | $272k | 3.1 | 16.9% | #11-04 | 517 | $1,368 | $0.707m |
| 32 | 8 Mar 2011 | $200k | 2.9 | 12.58% | #09-04 | 517 | $1,316 | $0.680m |
| 31 | 12 Jan 2011 | $159k | 1.4 | 23.64% | #02-02 | 484 | $1,280 | $0.620m |
| 30 | 11 Jan 2011 | $395k | 4.2 | 13.71% | #11-01 | 850 | $1,123 | $0.955m |
| 29 | 20 Dec 2010 | $253k | 3.9 | 13.89% | #05-02 | 484 | $1,311 | $0.635m |
| 28 | 17 Dec 2010 | $215k | 1.6 | 28% | #05-04 | 517 | $1,258 | $0.650m |
| 27 | 29 Oct 2010 | $60k | 0.7 | 14.8% | #15-02 | 484 | $1,321 | $0.640m |
| 26 | 27 Aug 2010 | $100k | 1 | 19.93% | #03-02 | 484 | $1,197 | $0.580m |
| 25 | 2 Aug 2010 | $165k | 3 | 10.17% | #10-04 | 517 | $1,277 | $0.660m |
| 24 | 3 Jun 2010 | $160k | 0.9 | 36.24% | #08-04 | 517 | $1,239 | $0.640m |
| 23 | 26 Apr 2010 | $120k | 0.8 | 22.82% | #09-01 | 850 | $894 | $0.760m |
| 22 | 19 Apr 2010 | $175k | 0.5 | 51.41% | #14-03 | 990 | $990 | $0.980m |
| 21 | 5 Apr 2010 | $100k | 2.3 | 8.85% | #11-02 | 484 | $1,187 | $0.575m |
| 20 | 22 Mar 2010 | $170k | 3.4 | 8.13% | #02-03 | 872 | $826 | $0.720m |
| 19 | 12 Feb 2010 | $90k | 1.3 | 14.24% | #15-02 | 484 | $1,197 | $0.580m |
| 18 | 26 Jan 2010 | $98k | 2 | 7.02% | #12-01 | 850 | $906 | $0.770m |
| 17 | 20 Jan 2010 | $143k | 2.7 | 10.18% | #15-04 | 517 | $1,219 | $0.630m |
| 16 | 14 Jan 2010 | $161k | 3 | 12.37% | #06-02 | 484 | $1,135 | $0.550m |
| 15 | 3 Dec 2009 | $207k | 3.2 | 9.63% | #13-03 | 990 | $828 | $0.820m |
| 14 | 29 Oct 2009 | $186k | 3 | 9.32% | #14-03 | 990 | $813 | $0.805m |
| 13 | 2 Oct 2009 | $75k | 0.3 | 63.39% | #04-02 | 484 | $1,053 | $0.510m |
| 12 | 17 Sep 2009 | $100k | 2.5 | 8.51% | #12-02 | 484 | $1,105 | $0.535m |
| 11 | 3 Sep 2009 | $116k | 2.6 | 7.69% | #05-01 | 850 | $776 | $0.660m |
| 10 | 20 Aug 2009 | $111k | 2.8 | 8.81% | #12-04 | 517 | $1,016 | $0.525m |
| 9 | 12 Aug 2009 | $126k | 2.7 | 11.76% | #03-02 | 484 | $991 | $0.480m |
| 8 | 30 Jul 2009 | $98k | 2.5 | 6.8% | #04-01 | 850 | $762 | $0.648m |
| 7 | 3 Jul 2009 | $112k | 2.7 | 5.57% | #15-01 | 1,410 | $589 | $0.830m |
| 6 | 29 Jun 2009 | $90k | 2.6 | 8.35% | #08-04 | 517 | $929 | $0.480m |
| 5 | 25 Jun 2009 | $90k | 2.7 | 5.76% | #09-01 | 850 | $753 | $0.640m |
| 4 | 5 Jun 2009 | -$17k | 1.1 | -2.41% | #07-01 | 850 | $721 | $0.613m |
| 3 | 22 May 2009 | $79k | 2.4 | 7.72% | #13-04 | 517 | $919 | $0.475m |
| 2 | 6 May 2009 | $57k | 2.5 | 5.93% | #03-04 | 517 | $809 | $0.418m |
| 1 | 1 May 2009 | $37k | 2.2 | 4.17% | #05-04 | 517 | $842 | $0.435m |