The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
Camelot By-the-water Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D15 ≫ Camelot By-the-water ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 71 |
| Number of unprofitable | 10 |
| Highest Profit | $5,265,950 |
| Longest Held | 21.4 years |
| Highest Annualized | 143.14% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81 | 9 Jun 2025 | $170k | 11.8 | 0.29% | #01-05 | 3,294 | $1,518 | $5.000m |
| 80 | 14 Oct 2024 | $1,056k | 6.9 | 4.3% | #01-02 | 2,723 | $1,530 | $4.166m |
| 79 | 5 Jan 2024 | $3,346k | 17.7 | 5.62% | #01-02 | 3,531 | $1,530 | $5.400m |
| 78 | 4 Oct 2023 | $1,930k | 11 | 3.14% | #16-01 | 3,035 | $2,211 | $6.710m |
| 77 | 3 Jul 2023 | $1,950k | 14 | 3.59% | #04-04 | 2,745 | $1,822 | $5.000m |
| 76 | 9 Sep 2022 | $2,240k | 15.5 | 3.71% | #01-06 | 3,240 | $1,605 | $5.200m |
| 75 | 9 Sep 2022 | $3,020k | 19.2 | 4.94% | #06-04 | 2,745 | $1,822 | $5.000m |
| 74 | 31 Aug 2022 | $1,800k | 12.9 | 3.12% | #08-02 | 3,035 | $1,812 | $5.500m |
| 73 | 31 May 2022 | $2,470k | 15.6 | 5.95% | #03-03 | 2,433 | $1,706 | $4.150m |
| 72 | 5 Jan 2022 | $335k | 11.6 | 0.8% | #03-02 | 2,433 | $1,552 | $3.775m |
| 71 | 27 Dec 2021 | -$350k | 10.1 | -0.99% | #01-03 | 2,723 | $1,212 | $3.300m |
| 70 | 30 Aug 2021 | $2,860k | 21.4 | 3.97% | #03-01 | 3,035 | $1,670 | $5.068m |
| 69 | 10 Feb 2021 | $2,671k | 20.3 | 3.73% | #12-02 | 3,035 | $1,676 | $5.088m |
| 68 | 22 Jan 2021 | $400k | 2 | 3.85% | #17-02 | 3,035 | $1,779 | $5.400m |
| 67 | 28 Sep 2020 | $2,845k | 20.5 | 4.08% | #06-02 | 3,035 | $1,676 | $5.088m |
| 66 | 30 Jan 2020 | $1,000k | 12 | 1.38% | #14-01 | 4,801 | $1,375 | $6.600m |
| 65 | 13 Sep 2019 | $300k | 4.2 | 1.83% | #06-02 | 2,637 | $1,555 | $4.100m |
| 64 | 17 Jul 2019 | $638k | 11.2 | 1.57% | #10-03 | 2,637 | $1,517 | $4.000m |
| 63 | 8 Jan 2019 | $2,517k | 18.6 | 3.83% | #17-02 | 3,035 | $1,647 | $5.000m |
| 62 | 5 Jun 2018 | $2,351k | 17.9 | 3.79% | #16-02 | 3,035 | $1,591 | $4.830m |
| 61 | 11 Apr 2018 | $2,699k | 12 | 8.08% | #05-05 | 2,874 | $1,550 | $4.455m |
| 60 | 14 Dec 2017 | $2,260k | 11.7 | 7.33% | #02-06 | 2,820 | $1,425 | $4.020m |
| 59 | 3 Nov 2017 | $1,533k | 11.2 | 6.27% | #01-02 | 2,723 | $1,142 | $3.110m |
| 58 | 25 Nov 2016 | -$170k | 6.4 | -0.68% | #11-02 | 2,637 | $1,452 | $3.830m |
| 57 | 10 Oct 2016 | $2,057k | 16.4 | 3.98% | #04-01 | 3,035 | $1,433 | $4.350m |
| 56 | 7 Jul 2015 | $362k | 7.8 | 1.29% | #06-02 | 2,637 | $1,441 | $3.800m |
| 55 | 18 Jun 2015 | $1,649k | 14.2 | 4.22% | #09-02 | 2,637 | $1,411 | $3.720m |
| 54 | 17 Mar 2015 | $1,300k | 8.3 | 5.55% | #07-02 | 2,637 | $1,365 | $3.600m |
| 53 | 16 Jan 2015 | $1,770k | 7.9 | 6.84% | #01-04 | 3,186 | $1,365 | $4.350m |
| 52 | 22 Dec 2014 | $1,500k | 7.1 | 5.56% | #10-01 | 2,626 | $1,790 | $4.700m |
| 51 | 16 Aug 2013 | $2,980k | 7 | 14.69% | #01-05 | 3,294 | $1,466 | $4.830m |
| 50 | 4 Jan 2013 | $2,337k | 12 | 5.94% | #07-02 | 3,035 | $1,544 | $4.688m |
| 49 | 3 Dec 2012 | $2,414k | 9.4 | 8.34% | #03-02 | 3,035 | $1,500 | $4.552m |
| 48 | 19 Nov 2012 | $4,072k | 9.4 | 9.07% | #04-06 | 5,360 | $1,362 | $7.300m |
| 47 | 12 Oct 2012 | $2,610k | 9.8 | 8.39% | #16-01 | 3,035 | $1,575 | $4.780m |
| 46 | 21 Sep 2012 | $2,241k | 11.8 | 5.72% | #10-02 | 3,035 | $1,532 | $4.650m |
| 45 | 7 Sep 2012 | $380k | 4.5 | 2.37% | #03-04 | 2,745 | $1,384 | $3.800m |
| 44 | 8 Jun 2012 | $2,220k | 5.9 | 13.57% | #01-01 | 3,531 | $1,195 | $4.220m |
| 43 | 4 Nov 2011 | $1,690k | 4.8 | 13.82% | #01-03 | 2,723 | $1,340 | $3.650m |
| 42 | 15 Sep 2011 | $2,200k | 5 | 15.29% | #02-07 | 2,842 | $1,513 | $4.300m |
| 41 | 5 Apr 2011 | $4,500k | 4.9 | 21.39% | #02-08 | 5,490 | $1,339 | $7.350m |
| 40 | 15 Oct 2010 | $2,107k | 8.3 | 9.2% | #09-01 | 2,626 | $1,542 | $4.050m |
| 39 | 30 Jun 2010 | $1,920k | 10.2 | 6.65% | #11-02 | 2,637 | $1,517 | $4.000m |
| 38 | 21 May 2010 | $5,266k | 9.9 | 9.28% | #19-02 | 5,834 | $1,543 | $9.000m |
| 37 | 21 May 2010 | $1,940k | 4 | 23.08% | #03-02 | 2,433 | $1,414 | $3.440m |
| 36 | 10 May 2010 | $2,142k | 10 | 6.65% | #13-01 | 3,035 | $1,482 | $4.500m |
| 35 | 17 Feb 2010 | $1,901k | 10 | 6.03% | #18-01 | 3,035 | $1,417 | $4.300m |
| 34 | 1 Dec 2009 | $1,723k | 9.5 | 5.91% | #08-01 | 3,035 | $1,351 | $4.100m |
| 33 | 9 Nov 2009 | $1,300k | 8.8 | 4.55% | #18-02 | 3,035 | $1,318 | $4.000m |
| 32 | 19 Oct 2009 | $1,400k | 2.9 | 19.63% | #10-02 | 2,637 | $1,308 | $3.450m |
| 31 | 29 Sep 2009 | $1,323k | 8.2 | 5.52% | #08-02 | 3,035 | $1,219 | $3.700m |
| 30 | 11 Sep 2009 | $1,412k | 3.4 | 22.33% | #02-02 | 2,433 | $1,172 | $2.850m |
| 29 | 15 Jul 2009 | $1,180k | 3.3 | 17.11% | #05-03 | 2,637 | $1,100 | $2.900m |
| 28 | 3 Jul 2009 | $840k | 2.4 | 11.19% | #05-02 | 3,035 | $1,235 | $3.750m |
| 27 | 24 Jun 2009 | $50k | 2 | 0.82% | #04-04 | 2,745 | $1,111 | $3.050m |
| 26 | 16 May 2008 | $2,400k | 1.9 | 35.3% | #11-03 | 5,048 | $1,070 | $5.400m |
| 25 | 12 May 2008 | $1,542k | 1.8 | 40% | #10-03 | 2,637 | $1,275 | $3.362m |
| 24 | 6 Mar 2008 | $620k | 1 | 23.3% | #03-04 | 2,745 | $1,246 | $3.420m |
| 23 | 25 Feb 2008 | $1,655k | 1.6 | 53.42% | #03-01 | 2,626 | $1,249 | $3.280m |
| 22 | 13 Feb 2008 | $2,925k | 3.1 | 26.81% | #14-01 | 4,801 | $1,166 | $5.600m |
| 21 | 15 Nov 2007 | $1,143k | 6.5 | 7.03% | #10-01 | 2,626 | $1,218 | $3.200m |
| 20 | 13 Sep 2007 | $1,788k | 1.5 | 63.14% | #06-02 | 2,637 | $1,304 | $3.438m |
| 19 | 29 Aug 2007 | $1,711k | 1.3 | 69.63% | #05-02 | 2,637 | $1,289 | $3.400m |
| 18 | 19 Jun 2007 | $1,340k | 1.1 | 67.57% | #04-04 | 2,745 | $1,093 | $3.000m |
| 17 | 21 Mar 2007 | $1,110k | 0.8 | 81.5% | #03-04 | 2,745 | $1,020 | $2.800m |
| 16 | 26 Feb 2007 | $788k | 0.5 | 106.46% | #01-04 | 3,186 | $810 | $2.580m |
| 15 | 15 Feb 2007 | $750k | 0.5 | 106.04% | #03-05 | 2,874 | $870 | $2.500m |
| 14 | 12 Feb 2007 | $854k | 0.4 | 143.14% | #05-02 | 3,035 | $959 | $2.910m |
| 13 | 15 Jan 2007 | $383k | 0.7 | 37.13% | #01-03 | 2,723 | $720 | $1.960m |
| 12 | 5 Dec 2006 | $465k | 0.6 | 47.74% | #01-01 | 3,025 | $711 | $2.150m |
| 11 | 29 Nov 2006 | $680k | 0.8 | 51.66% | #07-02 | 2,637 | $872 | $2.300m |
| 10 | 23 Nov 2006 | -$26k | 5.5 | -0.23% | #10-02 | 2,637 | $777 | $2.050m |
| 9 | 12 Oct 2006 | $6k | 6.6 | 0.06% | #03-03 | 2,433 | $691 | $1.680m |
| 8 | 22 Sep 2006 | -$264k | 5.8 | -2.08% | #05-02 | 3,035 | $677 | $2.056m |
| 7 | 18 Sep 2006 | -$168k | 6.3 | -1.12% | #14-01 | 3,035 | $751 | $2.280m |
| 6 | 1 Sep 2006 | -$13k | 6.3 | -0.1% | #02-07 | 2,842 | $739 | $2.100m |
| 5 | 15 Jul 2006 | -$155k | 6.2 | -1.32% | #10-03 | 2,637 | $690 | $1.820m |
| 4 | 16 May 2006 | -$518k | 6.1 | -2.69% | #02-08 | 5,490 | $519 | $2.850m |
| 3 | 11 Apr 2003 | -$544k | 2.7 | -9% | #13-02 | 3,035 | $626 | $1.900m |
| 2 | 24 Dec 2002 | -$221k | 2.7 | -3.58% | #16-01 | 3,035 | $715 | $2.170m |
| 1 | 13 Jan 2001 | $301k | 0.8 | 15.17% | #18-02 | 3,035 | $889 | $2.700m |