The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
Birmingham Mansions Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D11 ≫ Birmingham Mansions ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 67 |
| Number of unprofitable | 27 |
| Highest Profit | $2,013,540 |
| Longest Held | 26.1 years |
| Highest Annualized | 339.84% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 94 | 4 Oct 2023 | $570k | 11.5 | 2.93% | #03-01 | 1,076 | $1,877 | $2.020m |
| 93 | 10 Aug 2023 | $1,280k | 22.2 | 4.8% | #06-01 | 1,076 | $1,839 | $1.980m |
| 92 | 6 Apr 2023 | $2,014k | 23.4 | 5.04% | #12-01 | 1,711 | $1,724 | $2.950m |
| 91 | 6 May 2022 | $720k | 11.8 | 3.97% | #09-03 | 1,066 | $1,830 | $1.950m |
| 90 | 21 Apr 2022 | $1,050k | 21.6 | 3.64% | #11-06 | 1,076 | $1,812 | $1.950m |
| 89 | 8 Apr 2022 | $815k | 26.1 | 2.2% | #11-05 | 1,066 | $1,764 | $1.880m |
| 88 | 23 Apr 2021 | $550k | 7.8 | 2.73% | #12-02 | 1,701 | $1,705 | $2.900m |
| 87 | 6 Apr 2021 | $1,105k | 16.5 | 6.23% | #04-05 | 1,066 | $1,642 | $1.750m |
| 86 | 25 Mar 2021 | $1,150k | 21.8 | 4.43% | #02-05 | 1,141 | $1,648 | $1.880m |
| 85 | 18 Nov 2019 | $300k | 7.5 | 1.71% | #12-05 | 1,701 | $1,470 | $2.500m |
| 84 | 23 Jul 2019 | $978k | 14.7 | 6.39% | #09-01 | 1,076 | $1,522 | $1.638m |
| 83 | 21 Jul 2017 | $200k | 6.9 | 2.1% | #04-02 | 1,066 | $1,408 | $1.500m |
| 82 | 21 Mar 2017 | $311k | 20.9 | 1.14% | #06-03 | 1,066 | $1,379 | $1.470m |
| 81 | 22 May 2015 | $358k | 5.7 | 4.94% | #08-03 | 1,066 | $1,396 | $1.488m |
| 80 | 16 Mar 2015 | $150k | 4.5 | 2.43% | #11-01 | 1,076 | $1,347 | $1.450m |
| 79 | 24 Feb 2015 | $635k | 5.8 | 9.72% | #09-04 | 1,066 | $1,426 | $1.520m |
| 78 | 1 Sep 2014 | $944k | 6.9 | 15.02% | #08-02 | 1,066 | $1,426 | $1.520m |
| 77 | 29 Aug 2013 | $1,205k | 14.5 | 5.54% | #12-06 | 1,711 | $1,297 | $2.220m |
| 76 | 1 Jul 2013 | $720k | 5.6 | 6.76% | #12-02 | 1,701 | $1,382 | $2.350m |
| 75 | 21 Jun 2013 | $425k | 17.3 | 1.88% | #09-05 | 1,066 | $1,445 | $1.540m |
| 74 | 7 May 2012 | $220k | 1.4 | 7.6% | #12-05 | 1,701 | $1,294 | $2.200m |
| 73 | 3 May 2012 | $285k | 16 | 1.35% | #07-05 | 1,066 | $1,389 | $1.480m |
| 72 | 10 Apr 2012 | $115k | 1.4 | 5.92% | #03-01 | 1,076 | $1,347 | $1.450m |
| 71 | 23 Feb 2012 | $580k | 10.5 | 5.32% | #05-06 | 1,076 | $1,282 | $1.380m |
| 70 | 1 Jul 2011 | $325k | 15.3 | 1.68% | #11-03 | 1,066 | $1,361 | $1.450m |
| 69 | 2 Jun 2011 | $270k | 1.8 | 11.86% | #04-03 | 1,066 | $1,379 | $1.470m |
| 68 | 29 Nov 2010 | $480k | 1.4 | 21.47% | #12-05 | 1,701 | $1,164 | $1.980m |
| 67 | 3 Nov 2010 | $615k | 12.3 | 5.15% | #03-01 | 1,076 | $1,240 | $1.335m |
| 66 | 6 Oct 2010 | $220k | 14.6 | 1.25% | #07-01 | 1,076 | $1,240 | $1.335m |
| 65 | 31 Aug 2010 | $480k | 9.5 | 4.98% | #11-01 | 1,076 | $1,208 | $1.300m |
| 64 | 27 Aug 2010 | $200k | 2.8 | 6.1% | #04-02 | 1,066 | $1,220 | $1.300m |
| 63 | 2 Jul 2010 | $565k | 8.5 | 7.5% | #09-03 | 1,066 | $1,154 | $1.230m |
| 62 | 27 Apr 2010 | $279k | 14.3 | 1.73% | #06-06 | 1,076 | $1,194 | $1.285m |
| 61 | 8 Sep 2009 | $392k | 4 | 11.23% | #08-03 | 1,066 | $1,060 | $1.130m |
| 60 | 11 Aug 2009 | $100k | 1.1 | 8.15% | #04-03 | 1,066 | $1,126 | $1.200m |
| 59 | 17 Jul 2009 | $215k | 0.6 | 42.39% | #02-03 | 1,066 | $999 | $1.065m |
| 58 | 25 Jun 2009 | $550k | 2.5 | 19.62% | #12-05 | 1,701 | $882 | $1.500m |
| 57 | 24 Jun 2009 | $360k | 2.5 | 17.68% | #07-03 | 1,066 | $995 | $1.060m |
| 56 | 8 May 2009 | -$125k | 13.2 | -0.89% | #10-05 | 1,066 | $938 | $1.000m |
| 55 | 24 Apr 2009 | $5k | 9 | 0.06% | #09-04 | 1,066 | $830 | $0.885m |
| 54 | 16 Apr 2009 | $266k | 2.8 | 13.82% | #02-01 | 1,076 | $821 | $0.884m |
| 53 | 27 Nov 2008 | $80k | 1.8 | 5.68% | #02-03 | 1,066 | $798 | $0.850m |
| 52 | 1 Jul 2008 | $19k | 12.3 | 0.14% | #04-03 | 1,066 | $1,032 | $1.100m |
| 51 | 27 Nov 2007 | -$75k | 10.2 | -0.44% | #12-02 | 1,701 | $958 | $1.630m |
| 50 | 1 Nov 2007 | $432k | 1.6 | 36.66% | #04-02 | 1,066 | $1,032 | $1.100m |
| 49 | 26 Sep 2007 | -$74k | 5.7 | -2.12% | #08-02 | 1,066 | $541 | $0.576m |
| 48 | 29 Aug 2007 | $360k | 3 | 16.31% | #02-04 | 1,066 | $920 | $0.980m |
| 47 | 13 Feb 2007 | $20k | 5.1 | 0.52% | #02-03 | 1,066 | $723 | $0.770m |
| 46 | 20 Dec 2006 | -$24k | 4.9 | -0.44% | #12-04 | 1,701 | $653 | $1.110m |
| 45 | 7 Dec 2006 | -$184k | 4.9 | -3.56% | #12-05 | 1,701 | $559 | $0.950m |
| 44 | 6 Dec 2006 | $38k | 2 | 2.87% | #07-03 | 1,066 | $657 | $0.700m |
| 43 | 27 Nov 2006 | $38k | 7.5 | 0.74% | #07-04 | 1,066 | $666 | $0.710m |
| 42 | 13 Apr 2006 | $25k | 4.2 | 0.9% | #09-02 | 1,066 | $633 | $0.675m |
| 41 | 11 Apr 2006 | -$28k | 3.3 | -0.91% | #12-03 | 1,701 | $535 | $0.910m |
| 40 | 27 Mar 2006 | -$4k | 7 | -0.08% | #04-02 | 1,066 | $627 | $0.668m |
| 39 | 22 Sep 2005 | -$522k | 8 | -7.08% | #11-02 | 1,066 | $610 | $0.650m |
| 38 | 7 Sep 2005 | $88k | 3.5 | 3.7% | #08-03 | 1,066 | $693 | $0.738m |
| 37 | 16 Dec 2004 | $7k | 2.4 | 0.45% | #07-03 | 1,066 | $621 | $0.662m |
| 36 | 10 Dec 2004 | -$388k | 9 | -4.86% | #09-06 | 1,076 | $641 | $0.690m |
| 35 | 17 Nov 2004 | -$460k | 8.7 | -5.88% | #09-01 | 1,076 | $613 | $0.660m |
| 34 | 18 Aug 2004 | -$130k | 2.6 | -7.08% | #02-04 | 1,066 | $582 | $0.620m |
| 33 | 1 Jun 2004 | -$470k | 8.3 | -6.33% | #10-01 | 1,076 | $609 | $0.655m |
| 32 | 23 Dec 2002 | -$699k | 6.8 | -7.89% | #12-03 | 1,701 | $552 | $0.938m |
| 31 | 8 Aug 2002 | -$517k | 4.9 | -11.19% | #07-03 | 1,066 | $615 | $0.655m |
| 30 | 1 Apr 2002 | $85k | 0.6 | 20.39% | #06-05 | 1,066 | $709 | $0.755m |
| 29 | 14 Mar 2002 | -$517k | 4.5 | -12.13% | #07-02 | 1,066 | $615 | $0.655m |
| 28 | 10 Mar 2002 | -$522k | 4.5 | -12.32% | #08-03 | 1,066 | $610 | $0.650m |
| 27 | 5 Mar 2002 | -$256k | 6.3 | -4.47% | #10-06 | 1,076 | $715 | $0.770m |
| 26 | 1 Feb 2002 | -$522k | 4.4 | -12.58% | #09-02 | 1,066 | $610 | $0.650m |
| 25 | 1 Feb 2002 | -$522k | 4.4 | -12.58% | #08-02 | 1,066 | $610 | $0.650m |
| 24 | 1 Jan 2002 | -$507k | 4.3 | -12.35% | #09-03 | 1,066 | $624 | $0.665m |
| 23 | 1 Dec 2001 | -$520k | 5.7 | -10.34% | #08-01 | 1,076 | $557 | $0.600m |
| 22 | 1 Sep 2001 | -$502k | 4 | -13.15% | #11-04 | 1,066 | $629 | $0.670m |
| 21 | 16 Aug 2001 | $208k | 2.2 | 14.4% | #05-06 | 1,076 | $743 | $0.800m |
| 20 | 10 Aug 2001 | -$502k | 3.9 | -13.33% | #06-05 | 1,066 | $629 | $0.670m |
| 19 | 2 Jul 2001 | -$502k | 3.8 | -13.68% | #10-02 | 1,066 | $629 | $0.670m |
| 18 | 1 Jun 2001 | -$484k | 3.7 | -13.18% | #06-01 | 1,076 | $650 | $0.700m |
| 17 | 10 Mar 2001 | -$263k | 5.1 | -5.3% | #11-01 | 1,076 | $762 | $0.820m |
| 16 | 15 Sep 2000 | -$131k | 4.7 | -2.87% | #11-06 | 1,076 | $836 | $0.900m |
| 15 | 18 Jul 2000 | $180k | 1.3 | 19% | #06-02 | 1,066 | $807 | $0.860m |
| 14 | 1 Sep 1999 | $284k | 0.3 | 339.84% | #05-02 | 1,066 | $816 | $0.870m |
| 13 | 13 Sep 1997 | $51k | 1.5 | 2.03% | #12-02 | 1,701 | $1,003 | $1.705m |
| 12 | 13 Sep 1997 | $63k | 1.5 | 3.73% | #06-01 | 1,076 | $1,100 | $1.184m |
| 11 | 13 Sep 1997 | $52k | 1.5 | 3.06% | #08-03 | 1,066 | $1,100 | $1.172m |
| 10 | 13 Sep 1997 | $57k | 1.5 | 3.41% | #07-03 | 1,066 | $1,100 | $1.172m |
| 9 | 13 Sep 1997 | $35k | 1.5 | 2.06% | #11-04 | 1,066 | $1,100 | $1.172m |
| 8 | 13 Sep 1997 | $40k | 1.5 | 2.37% | #10-02 | 1,066 | $1,100 | $1.172m |
| 7 | 13 Sep 1997 | $62k | 1.5 | 3.71% | #06-05 | 1,066 | $1,100 | $1.172m |
| 6 | 13 Sep 1997 | $52k | 1.5 | 3.06% | #08-02 | 1,066 | $1,100 | $1.172m |
| 5 | 13 Sep 1997 | $57k | 1.5 | 3.41% | #07-02 | 1,066 | $1,100 | $1.172m |
| 4 | 13 Sep 1997 | $46k | 1.5 | 2.68% | #09-02 | 1,066 | $1,100 | $1.172m |
| 3 | 13 Sep 1997 | $46k | 1.5 | 2.71% | #09-03 | 1,066 | $1,100 | $1.172m |
| 2 | 13 Sep 1997 | $35k | 1.5 | 2.06% | #11-02 | 1,066 | $1,100 | $1.172m |
| 1 | 13 Jun 1996 | $88k | 0.2 | 35.19% | #10-03 | 1,066 | $1,145 | $1.220m |