The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
The Tate Residences Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D9 ≫ The Tate Residences ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 69 |
| Number of unprofitable | 20 |
| Highest Profit | $3,682,500 |
| Longest Held | 15 years |
| Highest Annualized | 93.25% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89 | 6 Mar 2023 | $887k | 13.1 | 1.03% | #19-01 | 2,196 | $3,224 | $7.080m |
| 88 | 25 Nov 2022 | $1,750k | 5.8 | 3.56% | #21-03 | 3,218 | $2,967 | $9.550m |
| 87 | 1 Jun 2022 | $1,040k | 12.8 | 1.32% | #21-01 | 2,196 | $3,074 | $6.750m |
| 86 | 18 Jan 2022 | -$621k | 11.2 | -1% | #31-02 | 1,894 | $2,771 | $5.250m |
| 85 | 1 Sep 2021 | $3,149k | 15 | 2.99% | #07-03 | 3,208 | $2,743 | $8.800m |
| 84 | 25 Aug 2021 | $128k | 14.9 | 0.17% | #32-02 | 1,894 | $2,639 | $5.000m |
| 83 | 22 Jun 2021 | $220k | 10.2 | 0.26% | #06-03 | 3,208 | $2,681 | $8.600m |
| 82 | 30 Mar 2021 | $220k | 4 | 1.23% | #12-02 | 1,894 | $2,439 | $4.620m |
| 81 | 22 Jan 2021 | $800k | 6.2 | 1.71% | #09-03 | 3,208 | $2,478 | $7.950m |
| 80 | 24 Oct 2019 | -$150k | 11.3 | -0.28% | #29-02 | 1,894 | $2,470 | $4.680m |
| 79 | 16 Aug 2019 | $500k | 6.1 | 1.06% | #31-03 | 3,240 | $2,469 | $8.000m |
| 78 | 31 Jul 2019 | -$275k | 8.6 | -0.63% | #09-02 | 1,894 | $2,634 | $4.990m |
| 77 | 10 May 2018 | $820k | 11.7 | 1.11% | #13-03 | 3,208 | $2,120 | $6.800m |
| 76 | 25 Apr 2018 | -$3,302k | 10.7 | -3.17% | #27-03 | 3,229 | $2,477 | $8.000m |
| 75 | 26 Feb 2018 | $437k | 11.5 | 0.49% | #30-03 | 3,240 | $2,469 | $8.000m |
| 74 | 25 Sep 2017 | -$1,450k | 7.8 | -2.24% | #15-03 | 3,208 | $2,323 | $7.450m |
| 73 | 4 Sep 2017 | -$2,100k | 7.8 | -3.54% | #08-03 | 3,208 | $2,026 | $6.500m |
| 72 | 7 Apr 2017 | $425k | 10.6 | 0.97% | #12-02 | 1,894 | $2,323 | $4.400m |
| 71 | 9 Feb 2017 | $476k | 10.3 | 0.61% | #21-03 | 3,218 | $2,424 | $7.800m |
| 70 | 1 Feb 2017 | -$1,712k | 9.3 | -3.3% | #07-01 | 2,185 | $2,145 | $4.688m |
| 69 | 14 Sep 2016 | -$218k | 7.2 | -0.59% | #13-01 | 2,185 | $2,300 | $5.025m |
| 68 | 28 Jul 2016 | -$197k | 9.9 | -0.28% | #19-03 | 3,218 | $2,144 | $6.900m |
| 67 | 28 Apr 2016 | -$357k | 9.6 | -0.54% | #18-03 | 3,218 | $2,082 | $6.700m |
| 66 | 24 Oct 2014 | $440k | 8.1 | 0.79% | #09-03 | 3,208 | $2,229 | $7.150m |
| 65 | 5 Sep 2014 | -$12k | 6.3 | -0.03% | #33-01 | 2,239 | $2,725 | $6.100m |
| 64 | 12 Jul 2013 | -$300k | 6.8 | -0.58% | #31-03 | 3,240 | $2,315 | $7.500m |
| 63 | 25 Jul 2011 | $240k | 4 | 0.92% | #15-01 | 2,185 | $3,070 | $6.708m |
| 62 | 25 Apr 2011 | $2,065k | 4.7 | 6.27% | #06-03 | 3,208 | $2,613 | $8.380m |
| 61 | 7 Jan 2011 | $1,695k | 1.7 | 25.88% | #09-02 | 1,894 | $2,779 | $5.265m |
| 60 | 15 Dec 2010 | $1,422k | 4.3 | 7.64% | #15-02 | 1,894 | $2,779 | $5.265m |
| 59 | 19 Nov 2010 | $1,021k | 4.1 | 4.77% | #31-02 | 1,894 | $3,099 | $5.871m |
| 58 | 8 Nov 2010 | $231k | 0.8 | 4.32% | #27-01 | 2,207 | $3,051 | $6.731m |
| 57 | 29 Oct 2010 | $793k | 3.5 | 4.53% | #21-02 | 1,894 | $2,899 | $5.493m |
| 56 | 23 Sep 2010 | $649k | 3.4 | 2.17% | #17-03 | 3,208 | $2,853 | $9.150m |
| 55 | 6 Sep 2010 | $370k | 3.6 | 2.13% | #13-02 | 1,894 | $2,666 | $5.050m |
| 54 | 26 Mar 2010 | $1,873k | 3.5 | 10.21% | #12-01 | 2,185 | $2,946 | $6.438m |
| 53 | 22 Mar 2010 | $1,010k | 3.5 | 6.01% | #24-02 | 1,894 | $2,879 | $5.455m |
| 52 | 16 Mar 2010 | $1,118k | 3.1 | 6.34% | #20-01 | 2,196 | $2,900 | $6.368m |
| 51 | 9 Feb 2010 | $654k | 2.6 | 3.74% | #33-02 | 2,271 | $3,188 | $7.240m |
| 50 | 9 Feb 2010 | $44k | 2.7 | 0.26% | #19-01 | 2,196 | $2,820 | $6.193m |
| 49 | 28 Jan 2010 | $1,600k | 0.8 | 59.9% | #11-02 | 1,894 | $2,692 | $5.100m |
| 48 | 11 Jan 2010 | $1,454k | 3.3 | 7.91% | #27-01 | 2,207 | $2,946 | $6.500m |
| 47 | 30 Dec 2009 | $992k | 3.4 | 7.14% | #07-02 | 1,894 | $2,534 | $4.800m |
| 46 | 29 Dec 2009 | $1,541k | 3.3 | 11.68% | #08-02 | 1,894 | $2,639 | $5.000m |
| 45 | 2 Dec 2009 | $806k | 3.2 | 5.82% | #16-02 | 1,894 | $2,599 | $4.924m |
| 44 | 30 Nov 2009 | $5k | 2.5 | 0.02% | #08-03 | 3,208 | $2,681 | $8.600m |
| 43 | 21 Nov 2009 | $880k | 2.7 | 3.98% | #15-03 | 3,208 | $2,775 | $8.900m |
| 42 | 9 Nov 2009 | -$587k | 2.4 | -4.07% | #14-01 | 2,185 | $2,581 | $5.640m |
| 41 | 9 Nov 2009 | $453k | 3.1 | 2.96% | #27-02 | 1,894 | $2,799 | $5.303m |
| 40 | 11 Sep 2009 | $1,435k | 3.1 | 10.49% | #10-01 | 2,185 | $2,500 | $5.463m |
| 39 | 31 Aug 2009 | $483k | 0.2 | 48.34% | #21-01 | 2,196 | $2,600 | $5.710m |
| 38 | 29 Jul 2009 | $830k | 2.9 | 5.84% | #22-01 | 2,196 | $2,480 | $5.446m |
| 37 | 2 Jul 2009 | $1,125k | 2.8 | 8.88% | #13-01 | 2,185 | $2,400 | $5.244m |
| 36 | 1 Jul 2009 | $458k | 2.8 | 4.29% | #14-02 | 1,894 | $2,154 | $4.080m |
| 35 | 29 Jun 2009 | -$132k | 2.2 | -1.05% | #26-01 | 2,207 | $2,500 | $5.517m |
| 34 | 15 Jun 2009 | $458k | 2.7 | 2.36% | #16-03 | 3,208 | $2,307 | $7.400m |
| 33 | 10 Jun 2009 | -$274k | 2.2 | -2.28% | #21-01 | 2,196 | $2,380 | $5.226m |
| 32 | 6 May 2009 | $426k | 2.7 | 3.56% | #17-01 | 2,185 | $2,150 | $4.698m |
| 31 | 30 Apr 2009 | -$89k | 2.6 | -0.93% | #09-02 | 1,894 | $1,884 | $3.570m |
| 30 | 27 Apr 2009 | -$132k | 2.6 | -1.32% | #19-02 | 1,894 | $1,950 | $3.693m |
| 29 | 13 Apr 2009 | -$52k | 2.6 | -0.55% | #17-02 | 1,894 | $1,890 | $3.580m |
| 28 | 9 Apr 2009 | -$211k | 2.6 | -2.2% | #11-02 | 1,894 | $1,848 | $3.500m |
| 27 | 24 Mar 2009 | -$694k | 2.5 | -4.27% | #11-03 | 3,208 | $1,850 | $5.933m |
| 26 | 16 Jul 2008 | $159k | 1.9 | 1.77% | #29-02 | 1,894 | $2,549 | $4.830m |
| 25 | 13 May 2008 | $397k | 1.7 | 5.41% | #25-02 | 1,894 | $2,499 | $4.735m |
| 24 | 30 Apr 2008 | $1,023k | 1.7 | 11.45% | #33-01 | 2,239 | $2,730 | $6.112m |
| 23 | 11 Apr 2008 | $493k | 1.5 | 5.73% | #31-01 | 2,217 | $2,700 | $5.986m |
| 22 | 4 Apr 2008 | $210k | 1.6 | 2.78% | #28-02 | 1,894 | $2,549 | $4.830m |
| 21 | 24 Oct 2007 | $2,554k | 1.2 | 55.42% | #07-01 | 2,185 | $2,929 | $6.400m |
| 20 | 10 Aug 2007 | $1,764k | 0.9 | 44.07% | #30-02 | 1,894 | $3,201 | $6.064m |
| 19 | 3 Aug 2007 | $3,682k | 0.8 | 65.77% | #27-03 | 3,229 | $3,500 | $11.302m |
| 18 | 31 Jul 2007 | $2,069k | 0.9 | 53.15% | #15-01 | 2,185 | $2,960 | $6.468m |
| 17 | 23 Jul 2007 | $3,293k | 0.9 | 62.81% | #14-03 | 3,208 | $2,900 | $9.303m |
| 16 | 10 Jul 2007 | $1,805k | 0.8 | 48.5% | #33-02 | 2,271 | $2,900 | $6.586m |
| 15 | 10 Jul 2007 | $1,136k | 0.8 | 31.87% | #26-02 | 1,894 | $3,012 | $5.707m |
| 14 | 2 Jul 2007 | $2,014k | 0.7 | 39.36% | #25-03 | 3,229 | $2,990 | $9.655m |
| 13 | 25 Jun 2007 | $3,162k | 0.8 | 69.38% | #10-03 | 3,208 | $2,821 | $9.050m |
| 12 | 22 Jun 2007 | $2,077k | 0.8 | 62.75% | #14-01 | 2,185 | $2,850 | $6.227m |
| 11 | 21 Jun 2007 | $1,419k | 0.8 | 46.53% | #23-02 | 1,894 | $2,749 | $5.208m |
| 10 | 6 Jun 2007 | $1,906k | 0.7 | 39.76% | #08-03 | 3,208 | $2,679 | $8.595m |
| 9 | 25 May 2007 | $1,772k | 0.8 | 56.58% | #19-01 | 2,196 | $2,800 | $6.149m |
| 8 | 23 Apr 2007 | $377k | 0.6 | 14.67% | #21-02 | 1,894 | $2,481 | $4.700m |
| 7 | 20 Apr 2007 | $459k | 0.6 | 15.18% | #24-01 | 2,196 | $2,414 | $5.300m |
| 6 | 18 Apr 2007 | $1,920k | 0.6 | 49.89% | #17-03 | 3,208 | $2,650 | $8.501m |
| 5 | 30 Mar 2007 | $822k | 0.6 | 32.32% | #18-01 | 2,196 | $2,545 | $5.588m |
| 4 | 23 Mar 2007 | $613k | 0.6 | 21.67% | #21-01 | 2,196 | $2,505 | $5.500m |
| 3 | 21 Mar 2007 | $1,522k | 0.6 | 45.86% | #15-03 | 3,208 | $2,500 | $8.020m |
| 2 | 26 Jan 2007 | $1,088k | 0.4 | 93.25% | #13-02 | 1,894 | $2,470 | $4.680m |
| 1 | 22 Jan 2007 | $624k | 0.4 | 37.61% | #20-01 | 2,196 | $2,391 | $5.250m |