The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
Thomson View Condo Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D20 ≫ Thomson View Condo ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 64 |
| Number of unprofitable | 30 |
| Highest Profit | $2,010,100 |
| Longest Held | 24.3 years |
| Highest Annualized | 70.95% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 94 | 8 Sep 2023 | $468k | 6.1 | 5% | #12-01 | 1,313 | $1,384 | $1.818m |
| 93 | 18 Aug 2023 | $730k | 8.7 | 6.48% | #06-01 | 1,313 | $1,317 | $1.730m |
| 92 | 30 May 2023 | $1,165k | 23.6 | 4.86% | #25-04 | 1,313 | $1,317 | $1.730m |
| 91 | 14 Apr 2023 | $1,861k | 22 | 6.41% | #26-07 | 2,024 | $1,235 | $2.500m |
| 90 | 23 Sep 2020 | $1,050k | 12 | 6.95% | #07-07 | 2,024 | $939 | $1.900m |
| 89 | 28 Aug 2020 | $1,230k | 24.3 | 3.69% | #07-06 | 2,024 | $1,038 | $2.100m |
| 88 | 12 Mar 2020 | $1,020k | 23.8 | 3.18% | #18-07 | 2,024 | $959 | $1.940m |
| 87 | 27 Dec 2019 | $1,085k | 23.8 | 3.34% | #23-07 | 2,024 | $988 | $2.000m |
| 86 | 4 Oct 2019 | $500k | 5.5 | 7.59% | #23-01 | 1,313 | $1,142 | $1.500m |
| 85 | 20 Aug 2019 | $1,442k | 13.8 | 10.47% | #02-06 | 2,024 | $954 | $1.930m |
| 84 | 27 May 2019 | $942k | 10.8 | 6.29% | #11-06 | 2,024 | $964 | $1.950m |
| 83 | 3 May 2019 | $925k | 20.1 | 5.92% | #13-05 | 1,313 | $1,028 | $1.350m |
| 82 | 1 Jun 2017 | $1,170k | 14 | 8.58% | #17-06 | 2,024 | $845 | $1.710m |
| 81 | 26 May 2017 | $68k | 1.7 | 3.61% | #07-05 | 1,313 | $889 | $1.168m |
| 80 | 9 May 2017 | $1,155k | 11.7 | 10.61% | #08-03 | 2,024 | $825 | $1.670m |
| 79 | 25 Jan 2017 | $488k | 7.5 | 7.16% | #22-04 | 1,313 | $914 | $1.200m |
| 78 | 28 Dec 2016 | $480k | 20.4 | 2.53% | #24-05 | 1,313 | $914 | $1.200m |
| 77 | 29 Nov 2016 | $850k | 13.8 | 6.98% | #17-07 | 2,024 | $692 | $1.400m |
| 76 | 26 Oct 2016 | $780k | 12.8 | 9.91% | #03-05 | 1,313 | $845 | $1.110m |
| 75 | 29 Aug 2016 | $1,050k | 15.7 | 4.85% | - | 3,843 | $520 | $2.000m |
| 74 | 8 Jun 2016 | $465k | 19.9 | 2.67% | #18-04 | 1,313 | $868 | $1.140m |
| 73 | 11 Mar 2016 | $608k | 18.9 | 2.55% | #21-06 | 2,024 | $795 | $1.608m |
| 72 | 23 Nov 2015 | $597k | 18.1 | 3.97% | #23-05 | 1,313 | $899 | $1.181m |
| 71 | 20 Nov 2015 | $600k | 7.2 | 6.9% | #20-07 | 2,024 | $781 | $1.580m |
| 70 | 25 Sep 2015 | $320k | 4.7 | 6.79% | #25-05 | 1,313 | $914 | $1.200m |
| 69 | 10 Jul 2015 | $740k | 6.6 | 9.49% | #20-02 | 2,024 | $810 | $1.640m |
| 68 | 9 Mar 2015 | $320k | 18.5 | 1.99% | #15-05 | 1,313 | $800 | $1.050m |
| 67 | 26 Nov 2014 | $350k | 18.4 | 2.38% | #06-01 | 1,313 | $762 | $1.000m |
| 66 | 14 Oct 2014 | $460k | 5.2 | 6.39% | #16-06 | 2,024 | $829 | $1.678m |
| 65 | 18 Mar 2014 | $290k | 18.4 | 1.88% | #23-01 | 1,313 | $762 | $1.000m |
| 64 | 13 Aug 2012 | $2,010k | 13.3 | 9.63% | - | 3,843 | $742 | $2.850m |
| 63 | 13 Aug 2012 | $1,095k | 7.5 | 15.58% | #18-02 | 2,024 | $815 | $1.650m |
| 62 | 3 Aug 2012 | $400k | 3 | 9.91% | #06-03 | 2,024 | $805 | $1.630m |
| 61 | 16 Sep 2011 | $792k | 8.7 | 14.8% | #18-08 | 1,313 | $860 | $1.130m |
| 60 | 30 May 2011 | $167k | 1.4 | 13.33% | #07-08 | 1,313 | $803 | $1.055m |
| 59 | 6 Jan 2011 | $315k | 10.8 | 4.18% | #25-05 | 1,313 | $670 | $0.880m |
| 58 | 10 Dec 2010 | $520k | 3.7 | 19.32% | #23-04 | 1,313 | $822 | $1.080m |
| 57 | 4 Nov 2010 | $270k | 14.3 | 2.22% | #26-05 | 1,313 | $762 | $1.000m |
| 56 | 25 Aug 2010 | $455k | 9.6 | 6.94% | #10-04 | 1,313 | $727 | $0.955m |
| 55 | 3 Jun 2010 | $1,000k | 1.1 | 70.95% | - | 3,843 | $593 | $2.280m |
| 54 | 3 May 2010 | $252k | 15 | 2.18% | #16-08 | 1,313 | $694 | $0.912m |
| 53 | 19 Apr 2010 | $255k | 14.5 | 2.3% | #15-08 | 1,313 | $693 | $0.910m |
| 52 | 10 Feb 2010 | $660k | 8.7 | 8.48% | #10-03 | 2,024 | $642 | $1.300m |
| 51 | 15 Jan 2010 | $900k | 4 | 19.55% | - | 3,843 | $455 | $1.750m |
| 50 | 14 Jan 2010 | $558k | 4.2 | 26.76% | #07-08 | 1,313 | $676 | $0.888m |
| 49 | 7 Jan 2010 | $472k | 9.4 | 5.54% | #13-03 | 2,024 | $588 | $1.190m |
| 48 | 18 Sep 2009 | $535k | 10.1 | 6% | #09-03 | 2,024 | $593 | $1.200m |
| 47 | 4 Sep 2009 | $380k | 2.6 | 16.69% | #19-06 | 2,024 | $573 | $1.160m |
| 46 | 11 Aug 2009 | $150k | 2 | 6.62% | #06-03 | 2,024 | $608 | $1.230m |
| 45 | 31 Jul 2009 | $123k | 9 | 2.16% | #21-05 | 1,313 | $535 | $0.703m |
| 44 | 7 Jul 2009 | $17k | 13.2 | 0.18% | #22-04 | 1,313 | $542 | $0.712m |
| 43 | 19 Jun 2009 | $420k | 7.4 | 7.62% | #10-07 | 2,024 | $494 | $1.000m |
| 42 | 6 May 2009 | -$160k | 14 | -0.84% | - | 3,843 | $333 | $1.280m |
| 41 | 23 Jan 2009 | $120k | 9.7 | 2.51% | #02-01 | 1,313 | $426 | $0.560m |
| 40 | 28 Nov 2008 | $380k | 3.7 | 15.96% | #20-02 | 2,024 | $445 | $0.900m |
| 39 | 2 Oct 2008 | -$70k | 11.7 | -0.67% | #07-07 | 2,024 | $420 | $0.850m |
| 38 | 15 Sep 2008 | $340k | 4.3 | 12.14% | #13-02 | 2,024 | $435 | $0.880m |
| 37 | 30 Jul 2008 | $278k | 8.8 | 3.72% | #11-06 | 2,024 | $498 | $1.008m |
| 36 | 24 Jun 2008 | $305k | 8.9 | 4.17% | #09-02 | 2,024 | $494 | $1.000m |
| 35 | 28 May 2007 | -$50k | 12.1 | -0.47% | - | 3,843 | $221 | $0.850m |
| 34 | 16 Apr 2007 | $163k | 5.4 | 5.92% | #12-08 | 1,313 | $467 | $0.613m |
| 33 | 3 Apr 2007 | $32k | 6.5 | 0.65% | #20-06 | 2,024 | $382 | $0.774m |
| 32 | 12 Mar 2007 | -$140k | 10.1 | -2.21% | #19-01 | 1,313 | $419 | $0.550m |
| 31 | 9 Mar 2007 | -$32k | 5.3 | -1.2% | #02-05 | 1,313 | $372 | $0.488m |
| 30 | 9 Feb 2007 | $150k | 0.4 | 68.35% | #19-06 | 2,024 | $385 | $0.780m |
| 29 | 17 Apr 2006 | -$328k | 9.3 | -7.5% | #11-08 | 1,313 | $236 | $0.310m |
| 28 | 1 Sep 2005 | -$210k | 5.4 | -8.36% | #07-01 | 1,313 | $267 | $0.350m |
| 27 | 13 May 2005 | -$208k | 4.6 | -7.02% | #14-03 | 2,024 | $258 | $0.522m |
| 26 | 21 Mar 2005 | -$269k | 6.8 | -5.93% | #16-03 | 2,024 | $257 | $0.521m |
| 25 | 14 Mar 2005 | -$370k | 9.2 | -5.69% | #20-02 | 2,024 | $257 | $0.520m |
| 24 | 4 Feb 2005 | -$193k | 5 | -5.78% | #18-02 | 2,024 | $274 | $0.555m |
| 23 | 4 Feb 2005 | -$162k | 4.4 | -8.59% | #15-01 | 1,313 | $257 | $0.338m |
| 22 | 15 Nov 2004 | -$150k | 2.5 | -8.46% | - | 3,843 | $156 | $0.600m |
| 21 | 25 Aug 2004 | -$548k | 9 | -6.11% | - | 3,843 | $187 | $0.720m |
| 20 | 11 Jun 2004 | -$115k | 3.7 | -5.07% | #13-02 | 2,024 | $267 | $0.540m |
| 19 | 21 Apr 2004 | -$413k | 8.7 | -9.35% | #05-01 | 1,313 | $232 | $0.305m |
| 18 | 11 Jul 2003 | -$95k | 4.2 | -3.64% | #08-06 | 2,024 | $282 | $0.570m |
| 17 | 20 Jun 2003 | -$240k | 3 | -16.81% | #26-01 | 1,313 | $251 | $0.330m |
| 16 | 2 Jun 2003 | -$348k | 8.1 | -5.97% | #17-06 | 2,024 | $267 | $0.540m |
| 15 | 18 Dec 2002 | -$372k | 6.6 | -10.68% | #18-08 | 1,313 | $257 | $0.338m |
| 14 | 1 Dec 2001 | -$80k | 6.7 | -2.12% | #02-05 | 1,313 | $396 | $0.520m |
| 13 | 1 Dec 2001 | -$70k | 2.2 | -6.29% | #12-08 | 1,313 | $343 | $0.450m |
| 12 | 12 Jun 2001 | $46k | 3.3 | 2.88% | #22-08 | 1,313 | $396 | $0.520m |
| 11 | 7 Dec 2000 | -$165k | 5.4 | -2.9% | - | 3,843 | $247 | $0.950m |
| 10 | 1 Nov 2000 | -$165k | 4.1 | -6.14% | #17-05 | 1,313 | $419 | $0.550m |
| 9 | 23 Aug 2000 | $158k | 1.4 | 19.02% | #13-03 | 2,024 | $355 | $0.718m |
| 8 | 2 Aug 2000 | $5k | 0.7 | 1.2% | #21-05 | 1,313 | $442 | $0.580m |
| 7 | 1 Jul 2000 | -$265k | 4.2 | -7.73% | #12-02 | 2,024 | $330 | $0.668m |
| 6 | 11 Nov 1999 | -$125k | 3.8 | -5.07% | #21-05 | 1,313 | $438 | $0.575m |
| 5 | 9 Nov 1999 | -$95k | 3.9 | -3.94% | #25-04 | 1,313 | $430 | $0.565m |
| 4 | 9 Sep 1999 | -$140k | 2.8 | -8.16% | #12-08 | 1,313 | $396 | $0.520m |
| 3 | 10 Feb 1998 | -$84k | 0.1 | -58.14% | - | 3,843 | $290 | $1.116m |
| 2 | 15 Jan 1997 | -$27k | 0.8 | -4.95% | #11-08 | 1,313 | $486 | $0.638m |
| 1 | 12 Sep 1996 | $45k | 1.4 | 4.6% | #17-05 | 1,313 | $544 | $0.715m |