The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
Waterfall Gardens Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D10 ≫ Waterfall Gardens ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 90 |
| Number of unprofitable | 27 |
| Highest Profit | $1,569,300 |
| Longest Held | 15.4 years |
| Highest Annualized | 145.86% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 117 | 24 Oct 2024 | $782k | 13.9 | 1.32% | #05-11 | 2,196 | $2,131 | $4.680m |
| 116 | 25 Sep 2024 | $1,021k | 14.3 | 1.68% | #06-12 | 2,196 | $2,195 | $4.820m |
| 115 | 7 Dec 2023 | $1,100k | 11.1 | 1.53% | #11-10 | 3,380 | $2,101 | $7.100m |
| 114 | 19 May 2023 | $1,230k | 7.7 | 4.91% | #05-03 | 1,830 | $2,175 | $3.980m |
| 113 | 18 Nov 2022 | $1,300k | 15.4 | 1.06% | #11-06 | 4,036 | $2,150 | $8.680m |
| 112 | 27 Oct 2022 | -$300k | 11.9 | -0.35% | #12-10 | 4,392 | $1,605 | $7.050m |
| 111 | 25 Aug 2022 | $639k | 3.4 | 5.79% | #05-01 | 1,830 | $2,016 | $3.689m |
| 110 | 4 Jul 2022 | -$21k | 15.4 | -0.02% | #12-06 | 4,844 | $1,567 | $7.590m |
| 109 | 1 Jun 2022 | $600k | 10 | 1.51% | #02-11 | 2,196 | $1,958 | $4.300m |
| 108 | 27 Apr 2022 | $1,150k | 10.8 | 2.41% | #01-11 | 2,583 | $1,974 | $5.100m |
| 107 | 17 Aug 2021 | $630k | 4.1 | 5.19% | #02-10 | 1,830 | $1,847 | $3.380m |
| 106 | 16 Jul 2021 | $477k | 9.2 | 1.35% | #04-11 | 2,196 | $1,867 | $4.100m |
| 105 | 19 Apr 2021 | $630k | 6.1 | 2.91% | #07-08 | 2,196 | $1,799 | $3.950m |
| 104 | 22 Mar 2021 | $339k | 13.9 | 0.66% | #03-07 | 2,196 | $1,776 | $3.900m |
| 103 | 3 Dec 2020 | $400k | 4.2 | 3.24% | #02-01 | 1,830 | $1,749 | $3.200m |
| 102 | 19 Nov 2020 | $24k | 13.6 | 0.05% | #07-07 | 2,196 | $1,708 | $3.750m |
| 101 | 5 Dec 2019 | $286k | 12.6 | 0.61% | #08-07 | 2,196 | $1,776 | $3.900m |
| 100 | 10 Jul 2019 | $548k | 12.4 | 1.29% | #04-05 | 2,196 | $1,699 | $3.730m |
| 99 | 23 May 2019 | $610k | 12.2 | 1.75% | #01-09 | 2,196 | $1,457 | $3.200m |
| 98 | 22 Apr 2019 | $357k | 12 | 1.02% | #03-02 | 1,830 | $1,694 | $3.100m |
| 97 | 8 Apr 2019 | -$152k | 8.3 | -0.58% | #05-01 | 1,830 | $1,667 | $3.050m |
| 96 | 26 Mar 2019 | -$463k | 11.7 | -1.03% | #07-05 | 2,196 | $1,639 | $3.600m |
| 95 | 18 Mar 2019 | $150k | 6.5 | 0.79% | #07-04 | 1,830 | $1,629 | $2.980m |
| 94 | 15 Mar 2019 | $262k | 6.5 | 1.26% | #08-01 | 1,830 | $1,831 | $3.350m |
| 93 | 6 Mar 2019 | $550k | 9.5 | 2.04% | #08-10 | 1,830 | $1,721 | $3.150m |
| 92 | 19 Feb 2019 | -$109k | 11.6 | -0.25% | #04-12 | 2,196 | $1,699 | $3.730m |
| 91 | 12 Feb 2019 | -$329k | 11.7 | -0.76% | #05-07 | 2,196 | $1,594 | $3.500m |
| 90 | 28 Jun 2018 | $594k | 11.3 | 1.83% | #01-04 | 2,196 | $1,457 | $3.200m |
| 89 | 21 May 2018 | $73k | 11.2 | 0.19% | #10-07 | 2,196 | $1,617 | $3.550m |
| 88 | 10 May 2018 | -$17k | 11 | -0.04% | #06-07 | 2,196 | $1,685 | $3.700m |
| 87 | 24 Apr 2018 | $372k | 11.2 | 0.94% | #07-11 | 2,196 | $1,708 | $3.750m |
| 86 | 2 Apr 2018 | -$116k | 7.9 | -0.45% | #01-10 | 2,196 | $1,457 | $3.200m |
| 85 | 22 Feb 2018 | -$120k | 5.4 | -0.81% | #02-03 | 1,830 | $1,465 | $2.680m |
| 84 | 27 Nov 2017 | $25k | 8 | 0.11% | #07-09 | 1,830 | $1,544 | $2.825m |
| 83 | 25 Sep 2017 | -$71k | 10.3 | -0.25% | #02-04 | 1,830 | $1,492 | $2.730m |
| 82 | 31 Aug 2017 | $244k | 6.4 | 0.62% | #11-11 | 4,036 | $1,561 | $6.300m |
| 81 | 29 Aug 2017 | -$411k | 4.9 | -2.39% | #04-08 | 2,196 | $1,503 | $3.300m |
| 80 | 21 Jul 2017 | -$279k | 10 | -0.96% | #02-10 | 1,830 | $1,503 | $2.750m |
| 79 | 17 Jul 2017 | -$393k | 10.3 | -1.08% | #09-07 | 2,196 | $1,526 | $3.350m |
| 78 | 1 Jun 2017 | -$430k | 6.7 | -2.15% | #04-01 | 1,830 | $1,503 | $2.750m |
| 77 | 30 Mar 2017 | $26k | 10.2 | 0.08% | #08-08 | 2,196 | $1,526 | $3.350m |
| 76 | 2 Dec 2016 | $156k | 9.7 | 0.61% | #02-09 | 1,830 | $1,503 | $2.750m |
| 75 | 8 Nov 2016 | $274k | 9.6 | 1.09% | #04-09 | 1,830 | $1,519 | $2.780m |
| 74 | 7 Oct 2016 | $193k | 9.6 | 0.71% | #01-01 | 2,196 | $1,334 | $2.930m |
| 73 | 23 Sep 2016 | $70k | 9.5 | 0.27% | #02-01 | 1,830 | $1,530 | $2.800m |
| 72 | 2 Aug 2016 | -$1,163k | 9.4 | -1.69% | #12-11 | 4,844 | $1,383 | $6.700m |
| 71 | 29 Apr 2016 | -$241k | 5.6 | -1.29% | #09-08 | 2,196 | $1,457 | $3.200m |
| 70 | 1 Apr 2016 | -$307k | 9 | -1.07% | #06-08 | 2,196 | $1,366 | $3.000m |
| 69 | 6 Dec 2015 | $162k | 8.7 | 0.54% | #05-08 | 2,196 | $1,631 | $3.582m |
| 68 | 31 Aug 2015 | $23k | 8.3 | 0.1% | #05-03 | 1,830 | $1,503 | $2.750m |
| 67 | 7 Jul 2015 | -$250k | 8.3 | -0.85% | #08-06 | 2,196 | $1,548 | $3.400m |
| 66 | 25 Jun 2015 | -$279k | 8 | -1.16% | #03-01 | 1,830 | $1,557 | $2.850m |
| 65 | 18 Jun 2015 | -$108k | 8.1 | -0.49% | #10-03 | 1,830 | $1,450 | $2.654m |
| 64 | 29 May 2015 | $13k | 8.1 | 0.05% | #02-08 | 2,196 | $1,548 | $3.400m |
| 63 | 8 May 2015 | $213k | 8.2 | 0.8% | #10-08 | 2,196 | $1,543 | $3.388m |
| 62 | 26 Mar 2015 | -$116k | 8 | -0.43% | #07-08 | 2,196 | $1,512 | $3.320m |
| 61 | 15 Jul 2014 | $284k | 7.3 | 1.39% | #10-02 | 1,830 | $1,629 | $2.980m |
| 60 | 23 Oct 2013 | $642k | 4.2 | 4.23% | #01-12 | 2,583 | $1,548 | $4.000m |
| 59 | 4 Sep 2013 | $366k | 6.5 | 2.08% | #04-10 | 1,830 | $1,612 | $2.950m |
| 58 | 27 Mar 2013 | $610k | 6.1 | 3.74% | #07-10 | 1,830 | $1,655 | $3.028m |
| 57 | 18 Jan 2013 | $332k | 5.7 | 2.03% | #08-03 | 1,830 | $1,683 | $3.080m |
| 56 | 2 Nov 2012 | $1,162k | 5.7 | 3.85% | #11-10 | 3,380 | $1,775 | $6.000m |
| 55 | 22 Oct 2012 | $429k | 5.5 | 2.24% | #04-08 | 2,196 | $1,690 | $3.711m |
| 54 | 16 Oct 2012 | $100k | 5.3 | 0.46% | #01-06 | 2,583 | $1,606 | $4.150m |
| 53 | 16 Oct 2012 | $291k | 5.6 | 1.47% | #06-06 | 2,196 | $1,680 | $3.689m |
| 52 | 5 Oct 2012 | $100k | 5.4 | 0.67% | #02-03 | 1,830 | $1,530 | $2.800m |
| 51 | 19 Sep 2012 | $255k | 5.4 | 1.34% | #03-08 | 2,196 | $1,662 | $3.650m |
| 50 | 7 Sep 2012 | $497k | 5.6 | 3.18% | #08-01 | 1,830 | $1,687 | $3.088m |
| 49 | 3 Sep 2012 | $89k | 5.4 | 0.6% | #07-04 | 1,830 | $1,547 | $2.830m |
| 48 | 29 Aug 2012 | -$160k | 5.3 | -1.11% | #04-03 | 1,830 | $1,451 | $2.655m |
| 47 | 8 Aug 2012 | $394k | 3 | 4.82% | #09-09 | 1,830 | $1,650 | $3.019m |
| 46 | 21 May 2012 | $258k | 5.2 | 1.4% | #02-11 | 2,196 | $1,685 | $3.700m |
| 45 | 15 May 2012 | -$300k | 4.9 | -1.99% | #01-03 | 2,196 | $1,321 | $2.900m |
| 44 | 7 May 2012 | $502k | 5.2 | 2.84% | #05-05 | 2,196 | $1,685 | $3.700m |
| 43 | 20 Apr 2012 | $44k | 5.1 | 0.24% | #04-11 | 2,196 | $1,650 | $3.623m |
| 42 | 27 Jul 2011 | $334k | 1.5 | 6.06% | #01-11 | 2,583 | $1,529 | $3.950m |
| 41 | 22 Jul 2011 | $338k | 4.3 | 2.83% | #05-02 | 1,830 | $1,639 | $3.000m |
| 40 | 10 Jun 2011 | $653k | 4.3 | 4.43% | #02-06 | 2,196 | $1,750 | $3.843m |
| 39 | 8 Jun 2011 | $585k | 1.6 | 14.25% | #04-02 | 1,830 | $1,620 | $2.965m |
| 38 | 7 Jun 2011 | $55k | 4 | 0.36% | #06-05 | 2,196 | $1,735 | $3.810m |
| 37 | 27 Apr 2011 | $694k | 4.2 | 4.81% | #01-08 | 2,583 | $1,500 | $3.875m |
| 36 | 13 Dec 2010 | $541k | 3.8 | 4.99% | #05-01 | 1,830 | $1,750 | $3.203m |
| 35 | 6 Dec 2010 | $539k | 3.8 | 5.18% | #10-09 | 1,830 | $1,690 | $3.093m |
| 34 | 3 Dec 2010 | $227k | 3.6 | 0.88% | #12-10 | 4,392 | $1,674 | $7.350m |
| 33 | 26 Nov 2010 | $537k | 3.7 | 4.05% | #05-11 | 2,196 | $1,775 | $3.898m |
| 32 | 30 Sep 2010 | $336k | 3.5 | 3.2% | #04-01 | 1,830 | $1,738 | $3.180m |
| 31 | 24 Sep 2010 | $109k | 3.7 | 0.88% | #09-08 | 2,196 | $1,567 | $3.441m |
| 30 | 11 Jun 2010 | $736k | 3.3 | 6.68% | #06-12 | 2,196 | $1,730 | $3.799m |
| 29 | 5 May 2010 | $751k | 3.2 | 8.42% | #01-10 | 2,196 | $1,510 | $3.316m |
| 28 | 22 Apr 2010 | $207k | 3.2 | 2.02% | #09-12 | 2,196 | $1,500 | $3.294m |
| 27 | 29 Mar 2010 | $89k | 2.9 | 1.09% | #08-04 | 1,830 | $1,550 | $2.836m |
| 26 | 26 Mar 2010 | $637k | 0.6 | 36.4% | #07-12 | 2,196 | $1,700 | $3.733m |
| 25 | 18 Feb 2010 | $514k | 3 | 4.73% | #01-07 | 2,583 | $1,548 | $4.000m |
| 24 | 9 Feb 2010 | $168k | 3 | 2.08% | #06-01 | 1,830 | $1,550 | $2.836m |
| 23 | 8 Feb 2010 | -$472k | 2.7 | -5.79% | #05-09 | 1,830 | $1,492 | $2.730m |
| 22 | 27 Jan 2010 | $205k | 2.9 | 2.01% | #01-11 | 2,583 | $1,400 | $3.616m |
| 21 | 21 Dec 2009 | $46k | 2.7 | 0.65% | #09-04 | 1,830 | $1,476 | $2.700m |
| 20 | 25 Nov 2009 | $358k | 2.8 | 5.04% | #07-09 | 1,830 | $1,530 | $2.800m |
| 19 | 29 Oct 2009 | $303k | 2.7 | 3.26% | #10-05 | 2,196 | $1,662 | $3.650m |
| 18 | 15 Oct 2009 | -$470k | 2.4 | -7.13% | #04-02 | 1,830 | $1,301 | $2.380m |
| 17 | 15 Sep 2009 | $218k | 2.6 | 3.38% | #09-10 | 1,830 | $1,448 | $2.650m |
| 16 | 15 Sep 2009 | $201k | 2.6 | 3.1% | #08-09 | 1,830 | $1,448 | $2.650m |
| 15 | 7 Sep 2009 | $175k | 2.6 | 2.75% | #08-10 | 1,830 | $1,421 | $2.600m |
| 14 | 28 Aug 2009 | $149k | 2.5 | 1.83% | #08-12 | 2,196 | $1,520 | $3.338m |
| 13 | 19 Aug 2009 | -$659k | 2.2 | -8.39% | #07-12 | 2,196 | $1,410 | $3.096m |
| 12 | 19 Aug 2009 | $170k | 2.5 | 2.69% | #09-09 | 1,830 | $1,435 | $2.625m |
| 11 | 18 Aug 2009 | -$60k | 2.5 | -0.77% | #02-12 | 2,196 | $1,400 | $3.074m |
| 10 | 15 Oct 2008 | $289k | 1.7 | 5.38% | #10-12 | 2,196 | $1,541 | $3.384m |
| 9 | 25 Jul 2007 | $786k | 0.4 | 86.97% | #06-09 | 1,830 | $1,760 | $3.221m |
| 8 | 16 Jul 2007 | $689k | 0.4 | 60.76% | #04-12 | 2,196 | $1,748 | $3.839m |
| 7 | 13 Jul 2007 | $740k | 0.4 | 66.61% | #07-05 | 2,196 | $1,850 | $4.063m |
| 6 | 21 Jun 2007 | $1,569k | 0.4 | 97.03% | #11-06 | 4,036 | $1,828 | $7.380m |
| 5 | 13 Jun 2007 | $622k | 0.3 | 71.66% | #08-05 | 2,196 | $1,750 | $3.843m |
| 4 | 13 Jun 2007 | $579k | 0.3 | 87.1% | #03-01 | 1,830 | $1,710 | $3.129m |
| 3 | 6 Jun 2007 | $684k | 0.3 | 90.04% | #07-12 | 2,196 | $1,710 | $3.755m |
| 2 | 4 Jun 2007 | $774k | 0.3 | 145.86% | #05-09 | 1,830 | $1,750 | $3.203m |
| 1 | 22 May 2007 | $493k | 0.3 | 70.13% | #03-05 | 2,196 | $1,670 | $3.667m |