The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
Teresa Ville Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D4 ≫ Teresa Ville ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 71 |
| Number of unprofitable | 22 |
| Highest Profit | $2,320,000 |
| Longest Held | 28.5 years |
| Highest Annualized | 451.36% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 94 | 8 Nov 2024 | $1,625k | 28.5 | 2.92% | #03-04 | 1,981 | $1,464 | $2.900m |
| 93 | 30 Sep 2024 | $2,006k | 17.5 | 5.64% | #16-01 | 1,959 | $1,662 | $3.256m |
| 92 | 1 Aug 2024 | $980k | 14.1 | 3.79% | #08-02 | 1,356 | $1,770 | $2.400m |
| 91 | 19 Jul 2024 | $1,110k | 8.7 | 5.1% | #05-03 | 1,981 | $1,601 | $3.170m |
| 90 | 31 May 2024 | $810k | 9.7 | 4.23% | #12-01 | 1,356 | $1,806 | $2.450m |
| 89 | 19 Jan 2024 | $1,470k | 26.2 | 3.96% | #11-02 | 1,356 | $1,696 | $2.300m |
| 88 | 8 Aug 2023 | $2,145k | 25.2 | 4.64% | #19-03 | 1,981 | $1,590 | $3.150m |
| 87 | 27 Jun 2023 | $765k | 9.8 | 3.94% | #17-01 | 1,356 | $1,784 | $2.420m |
| 86 | 20 Mar 2023 | $2,320k | 17 | 7.51% | #17-03 | 1,981 | $1,656 | $3.280m |
| 85 | 20 Jul 2022 | $1,710k | 17.8 | 7.57% | #13-01 | 1,356 | $1,733 | $2.350m |
| 84 | 8 Jul 2022 | $1,950k | 26.5 | 3.81% | #15-01 | 1,959 | $1,582 | $3.100m |
| 83 | 23 May 2022 | $850k | 9.5 | 3.42% | #13-03 | 1,927 | $1,609 | $3.100m |
| 82 | 16 Nov 2020 | $950k | 20.3 | 4.11% | #07-01 | 1,356 | $1,253 | $1.700m |
| 81 | 14 Nov 2019 | $230k | 7.5 | 1.33% | #21-02 | 1,959 | $1,240 | $2.430m |
| 80 | 3 Apr 2017 | $705k | 14.4 | 5.09% | #02-02 | 1,356 | $1,018 | $1.380m |
| 79 | 23 Mar 2017 | $0k | 7 | 0% | #05-04 | 1,981 | $1,010 | $2.000m |
| 78 | 5 Oct 2016 | $300k | 5.5 | 3.83% | #19-01 | 1,356 | $1,180 | $1.600m |
| 77 | 27 Sep 2016 | $1,080k | 13.3 | 6.62% | #07-02 | 1,959 | $960 | $1.880m |
| 76 | 28 Jul 2016 | $72k | 6.3 | 0.31% | #23-03 | 3,972 | $950 | $3.772m |
| 75 | 24 May 2016 | $558k | 7 | 4.63% | #11-04 | 1,927 | $1,068 | $2.058m |
| 74 | 17 Nov 2015 | $5k | 5.2 | 0.05% | #05-03 | 1,981 | $1,040 | $2.060m |
| 73 | 29 Apr 2015 | $860k | 20.2 | 3.72% | #18-02 | 1,356 | $1,217 | $1.650m |
| 72 | 2 Apr 2015 | $1,830k | 8.5 | 8.75% | #23-03 | 3,972 | $906 | $3.600m |
| 71 | 17 Jun 2014 | $1,275k | 3.1 | 10.55% | #23-01 | 3,972 | $1,190 | $4.725m |
| 70 | 25 Oct 2013 | $410k | 4 | 5.07% | #11-03 | 1,981 | $1,141 | $2.260m |
| 69 | 28 May 2013 | $850k | 12.7 | 5.73% | #20-01 | 1,356 | $1,239 | $1.680m |
| 68 | 6 May 2013 | $1,420k | 7.5 | 13.95% | #10-02 | 1,959 | $1,161 | $2.275m |
| 67 | 14 Nov 2012 | $1,050k | 16 | 4% | #13-03 | 1,927 | $1,168 | $2.250m |
| 66 | 5 Oct 2012 | $1,465k | 13.4 | 7.2% | #19-01 | 1,959 | $1,233 | $2.415m |
| 65 | 20 Sep 2012 | $1,390k | 11.4 | 8.5% | #16-04 | 1,927 | $1,194 | $2.300m |
| 64 | 14 Jun 2012 | $228k | 4 | 4.15% | #09-02 | 1,356 | $1,127 | $1.528m |
| 63 | 18 Apr 2012 | $925k | 12.5 | 4.8% | #05-04 | 1,927 | $1,080 | $2.080m |
| 62 | 12 Aug 2011 | $852k | 8 | 11.13% | #10-01 | 1,356 | $1,099 | $1.490m |
| 61 | 29 Jul 2011 | $910k | 4.6 | 13.45% | #16-04 | 1,981 | $1,035 | $2.050m |
| 60 | 21 Jul 2011 | $1,245k | 8.4 | 11.51% | #15-02 | 1,959 | $1,062 | $2.080m |
| 59 | 26 Apr 2011 | $190k | 1.5 | 7.07% | #12-02 | 1,959 | $1,021 | $2.000m |
| 58 | 21 Apr 2011 | $1,000k | 4.1 | 15.12% | #15-01 | 1,959 | $1,164 | $2.280m |
| 57 | 18 Apr 2011 | $975k | 14.9 | 4.13% | #11-01 | 1,959 | $1,097 | $2.150m |
| 56 | 10 Mar 2011 | $880k | 15.6 | 3.98% | #05-03 | 1,981 | $974 | $1.930m |
| 55 | 15 Feb 2011 | $1,100k | 11.9 | 7.08% | #13-03 | 1,981 | $1,000 | $1.980m |
| 54 | 15 Oct 2010 | $300k | 3.4 | 4.93% | #13-01 | 1,959 | $1,021 | $2.000m |
| 53 | 9 Sep 2010 | $855k | 14.6 | 3.75% | #05-03 | 1,981 | $1,038 | $2.055m |
| 52 | 30 Aug 2010 | $665k | 11.4 | 6.51% | #11-02 | 1,356 | $959 | $1.300m |
| 51 | 29 Jun 2010 | $711k | 7.9 | 9.2% | #08-02 | 1,356 | $1,047 | $1.420m |
| 50 | 12 Apr 2010 | $710k | 8.2 | 8.82% | #14-02 | 1,356 | $1,047 | $1.420m |
| 49 | 26 Feb 2010 | $770k | 2.8 | 21.69% | #19-04 | 1,927 | $945 | $1.820m |
| 48 | 10 Nov 2009 | $890k | 3.4 | 21.87% | #12-02 | 1,959 | $924 | $1.810m |
| 47 | 8 Oct 2009 | $960k | 10.6 | 7.17% | #11-03 | 1,981 | $934 | $1.850m |
| 46 | 10 Jul 2009 | $950k | 2.8 | 29.54% | #12-03 | 1,927 | $954 | $1.838m |
| 45 | 26 Jun 2009 | $632k | 3 | 18.16% | #09-03 | 1,981 | $820 | $1.625m |
| 44 | 15 May 2009 | $442k | 2.6 | 20.09% | #21-02 | 1,356 | $848 | $1.150m |
| 43 | 23 Jun 2008 | $650k | 2.3 | 34.54% | #09-02 | 1,356 | $959 | $1.300m |
| 42 | 31 Mar 2008 | $800k | 10.2 | 6.42% | #02-04 | 1,981 | $858 | $1.700m |
| 41 | 13 Nov 2007 | $1,220k | 9.5 | 8.71% | #20-04 | 1,927 | $1,152 | $2.220m |
| 40 | 30 May 2007 | $740k | 0.8 | 110.21% | #13-01 | 1,959 | $868 | $1.700m |
| 39 | 13 Apr 2007 | $430k | 8.1 | 5.34% | #16-01 | 1,959 | $638 | $1.250m |
| 38 | 7 Apr 2007 | $800k | 0.2 | 451.36% | #23-02 | 3,972 | $667 | $2.650m |
| 37 | 12 Mar 2007 | $595k | 8.9 | 3.95% | #23-04 | 3,853 | $529 | $2.040m |
| 36 | 5 Dec 2006 | $305k | 2.3 | 14.74% | #16-04 | 1,981 | $576 | $1.140m |
| 35 | 18 Sep 2006 | $38k | 8.2 | 0.54% | #12-03 | 1,927 | $461 | $0.888m |
| 34 | 13 Jul 2006 | -$157k | 10.8 | -1.35% | #09-03 | 1,981 | $501 | $0.993m |
| 33 | 11 Jun 2006 | $231k | 3 | 9.47% | #13-03 | 1,981 | $490 | $0.971m |
| 32 | 7 Apr 2006 | -$270k | 5.6 | -4.79% | #18-03 | 1,981 | $434 | $0.860m |
| 31 | 5 Apr 2006 | -$220k | 9 | -2.27% | #17-03 | 1,981 | $485 | $0.960m |
| 30 | 22 Feb 2006 | -$133k | 10.9 | -1.69% | #09-02 | 1,356 | $479 | $0.650m |
| 29 | 5 Jan 2006 | -$282k | 9.7 | -3.69% | #05-02 | 1,356 | $470 | $0.638m |
| 28 | 5 Dec 2005 | -$270k | 9.5 | -2.56% | #05-01 | 1,959 | $493 | $0.965m |
| 27 | 7 Nov 2005 | $45k | 7.3 | 0.74% | #10-02 | 1,959 | $436 | $0.855m |
| 26 | 18 Mar 2005 | -$385k | 8.7 | -4.14% | #22-03 | 1,981 | $437 | $0.865m |
| 25 | 5 Nov 2004 | $43k | 6.3 | 0.81% | #12-03 | 1,981 | $443 | $0.878m |
| 24 | 5 May 2004 | -$270k | 8.8 | -3.04% | #22-02 | 1,959 | $444 | $0.870m |
| 23 | 21 Apr 2004 | -$23k | 6 | -0.51% | #02-04 | 1,927 | $389 | $0.750m |
| 22 | 19 Jun 2003 | -$433k | 7.1 | -5.63% | #17-04 | 1,981 | $432 | $0.855m |
| 21 | 8 Aug 2002 | $64k | 3.4 | 2.86% | #08-02 | 1,356 | $523 | $0.709m |
| 20 | 15 Jul 2002 | $20k | 4.2 | 0.44% | #22-04 | 1,981 | $555 | $1.100m |
| 19 | 1 Apr 2002 | -$20k | 7.2 | -0.3% | #17-01 | 1,959 | $465 | $0.910m |
| 18 | 19 Mar 2002 | -$50k | 3.8 | -1.74% | #18-01 | 1,356 | $538 | $0.730m |
| 17 | 1 Feb 2002 | -$108k | 1.8 | -7.43% | #14-02 | 1,356 | $524 | $0.710m |
| 16 | 1 Mar 2001 | -$55k | 5.1 | -1.01% | #18-03 | 1,927 | $532 | $1.025m |
| 15 | 1 Mar 2001 | -$38k | 5.7 | -0.66% | #19-03 | 1,927 | $507 | $0.978m |
| 14 | 1 Oct 2000 | -$100k | 4.4 | -2.54% | #20-01 | 1,356 | $612 | $0.830m |
| 13 | 1 May 2000 | $285k | 1.1 | 40.4% | #15-01 | 1,356 | $675 | $0.915m |
| 12 | 5 Apr 2000 | -$168k | 2.8 | -5.2% | #18-04 | 1,927 | $545 | $1.050m |
| 11 | 9 Mar 2000 | $120k | 0.6 | 29.44% | #10-02 | 1,356 | $612 | $0.830m |
| 10 | 2 Feb 2000 | $90k | 4.7 | 2.59% | #10-02 | 1,356 | $590 | $0.800m |
| 9 | 1 Dec 1999 | $300k | 0.7 | 49% | #17-01 | 1,959 | $613 | $1.200m |
| 8 | 21 Aug 1999 | $130k | 3.9 | 2.87% | #14-03 | 1,981 | $621 | $1.230m |
| 7 | 2 Jul 1999 | -$350k | 2.6 | -12.25% | #21-04 | 1,927 | $441 | $0.850m |
| 6 | 1 Apr 1999 | -$0k | 0 | -1.42% | #14-03 | 1,927 | $473 | $0.912m |
| 5 | 18 Mar 1999 | -$268k | 1.4 | -16.45% | #14-03 | 1,927 | $474 | $0.913m |
| 4 | 15 Mar 1999 | -$375k | 1.8 | -18.07% | #11-03 | 1,981 | $449 | $0.890m |
| 3 | 9 Jun 1998 | $15k | 3.4 | 0.44% | #19-03 | 1,981 | $507 | $1.005m |
| 2 | 13 Jan 1998 | -$310k | 0.8 | -32.03% | #02-04 | 1,981 | $454 | $0.900m |
| 1 | 27 May 1996 | $275k | 1.2 | 22.57% | #05-01 | 1,959 | $630 | $1.235m |