The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
Scotts Highpark Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D9 ≫ Scotts Highpark ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 38 |
| Number of unprofitable | 23 |
| Highest Profit | $3,987,400 |
| Longest Held | 16.3 years |
| Highest Annualized | 65.15% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | 9 Sep 2024 | $1,000k | 11 | 1.25% | #22-03 | 3,466 | $2,250 | $7.800m |
| 60 | 10 Jul 2023 | $480k | 11.1 | 1.05% | #15-02 | 1,744 | $2,512 | $4.380m |
| 59 | 16 Jun 2023 | $61k | 16.2 | 0.16% | #12-01 | 1,141 | $2,060 | $2.350m |
| 58 | 18 May 2023 | $3,987k | 16.3 | 2.34% | #24-03 | 4,112 | $3,084 | $12.680m |
| 57 | 29 Sep 2022 | $398k | 15.5 | 0.9% | #19-01 | 1,776 | $1,734 | $3.080m |
| 56 | 21 Feb 2022 | -$93k | 14.8 | -0.27% | #16-01 | 1,141 | $1,972 | $2.250m |
| 55 | 16 Dec 2021 | $150k | 9.5 | 0.45% | #04-02 | 1,744 | $2,065 | $3.600m |
| 54 | 5 Nov 2021 | $2,424k | 14.9 | 2.39% | #06-03 | 3,466 | $2,366 | $8.200m |
| 53 | 25 Jun 2021 | -$898k | 13.6 | -0.9% | #09-03 | 3,466 | $1,991 | $6.900m |
| 52 | 26 May 2020 | -$350k | 9.2 | -0.99% | #14-02 | 1,744 | $2,093 | $3.650m |
| 51 | 2 Mar 2020 | $150k | 5.1 | 1.36% | #11-01 | 1,141 | $1,972 | $2.250m |
| 50 | 3 Dec 2019 | -$102k | 10.1 | -0.45% | #07-01 | 1,141 | $1,911 | $2.180m |
| 49 | 28 Nov 2019 | -$212k | 12.6 | -0.47% | #13-02 | 1,744 | $2,000 | $3.488m |
| 48 | 21 Dec 2018 | $100k | 6 | 0.19% | #25-04 | 4,209 | $2,138 | $9.000m |
| 47 | 25 Apr 2018 | $1,787k | 11.3 | 2.41% | #10-03 | 3,466 | $2,178 | $7.550m |
| 46 | 12 Feb 2018 | -$447k | 10.8 | -1.19% | #10-02 | 1,744 | $1,864 | $3.250m |
| 45 | 27 Nov 2017 | -$1,157k | 10.3 | -1.75% | #05-03 | 3,466 | $1,666 | $5.775m |
| 44 | 14 Sep 2017 | $50k | 2.1 | 0.75% | #05-02 | 1,744 | $1,835 | $3.200m |
| 43 | 6 Sep 2017 | $526k | 10.8 | 0.81% | #11-03 | 3,466 | $1,818 | $6.300m |
| 42 | 27 Jun 2017 | -$1,700k | 7.3 | -2.2% | #03-04 | 6,146 | $1,578 | $9.700m |
| 41 | 5 Jun 2017 | -$2,180k | 5.7 | -4.72% | #13-04 | 4,209 | $1,620 | $6.820m |
| 40 | 23 Aug 2016 | -$160k | 7.2 | -0.29% | #05-04 | 4,209 | $1,782 | $7.500m |
| 39 | 5 Aug 2016 | -$618k | 10 | -0.99% | #23-03 | 3,466 | $1,702 | $5.900m |
| 38 | 4 Apr 2016 | -$390k | 8.9 | -1.23% | #16-02 | 1,744 | $1,921 | $3.350m |
| 37 | 5 Aug 2015 | -$479k | 8.3 | -1.7% | #05-02 | 1,744 | $1,806 | $3.150m |
| 36 | 21 Jul 2015 | -$728k | 8.7 | -1.37% | #21-03 | 3,466 | $1,650 | $5.718m |
| 35 | 29 Apr 2015 | $117k | 8 | 0.69% | #05-01 | 1,141 | $1,911 | $2.180m |
| 34 | 26 Jan 2015 | -$199k | 7.7 | -1.16% | #11-01 | 1,141 | $1,841 | $2.100m |
| 33 | 16 Apr 2014 | $229k | 7.3 | 0.5% | #15-03 | 3,466 | $1,841 | $6.380m |
| 32 | 25 Mar 2014 | -$293k | 6.9 | -1.88% | #18-01 | 1,141 | $1,841 | $2.100m |
| 31 | 25 Sep 2013 | $60k | 6.4 | 0.26% | #03-02 | 1,744 | $2,100 | $3.662m |
| 30 | 5 Dec 2012 | -$1,075k | 4.8 | -2.33% | #25-04 | 4,209 | $2,115 | $8.900m |
| 29 | 14 Jun 2012 | $708k | 2.7 | 7.57% | #15-02 | 1,744 | $2,237 | $3.900m |
| 28 | 8 Jun 2012 | $200k | 2.1 | 1.35% | #07-03 | 3,466 | $2,077 | $7.200m |
| 27 | 10 May 2012 | $184k | 5 | 1.67% | #09-01 | 1,141 | $2,016 | $2.300m |
| 26 | 12 Sep 2011 | $1,950k | 5 | 5.02% | #13-04 | 4,209 | $2,138 | $9.000m |
| 25 | 27 Jul 2011 | $307k | 4.2 | 3.27% | #08-01 | 1,141 | $2,112 | $2.410m |
| 24 | 9 Mar 2011 | $286k | 3.8 | 1.95% | #14-02 | 1,744 | $2,294 | $4.000m |
| 23 | 2 Nov 2010 | $490k | 3.8 | 2.18% | #04-03 | 3,466 | $1,818 | $6.300m |
| 22 | 16 Aug 2010 | $785k | 0.9 | 28.26% | #09-02 | 1,744 | $2,200 | $3.837m |
| 21 | 28 Jun 2010 | -$718k | 3 | -2.97% | #20-03 | 3,466 | $2,193 | $7.600m |
| 20 | 2 Jun 2010 | $1,484k | 3.4 | 4.8% | #26-03 | 4,112 | $2,481 | $10.200m |
| 19 | 20 May 2010 | $745k | 3.3 | 3.71% | #03-03 | 3,466 | $1,888 | $6.544m |
| 18 | 30 Apr 2010 | $1,154k | 3.4 | 5.42% | #07-03 | 3,466 | $2,020 | $7.000m |
| 17 | 15 Oct 2009 | $193k | 2.5 | 3.64% | #07-01 | 1,141 | $2,000 | $2.282m |
| 16 | 15 Sep 2009 | -$535k | 2.4 | -6.28% | #15-02 | 1,744 | $1,830 | $3.192m |
| 15 | 15 Sep 2009 | -$631k | 2.3 | -7.74% | #09-02 | 1,744 | $1,750 | $3.052m |
| 14 | 10 Sep 2009 | $665k | 3 | 2.98% | #07-04 | 4,209 | $1,889 | $7.950m |
| 13 | 27 Aug 2009 | -$528k | 2.2 | -3.43% | #14-03 | 3,466 | $1,925 | $6.672m |
| 12 | 1 Aug 2009 | $355k | 2.6 | 2.15% | #16-03 | 3,466 | $1,907 | $6.610m |
| 11 | 31 Jul 2009 | $92k | 2.3 | 1.93% | #06-01 | 1,141 | $1,900 | $2.168m |
| 10 | 22 Jul 2009 | -$86k | 2.2 | -1.9% | #03-01 | 1,141 | $1,709 | $1.950m |
| 9 | 15 Jun 2009 | $399k | 2.7 | 1.98% | #05-04 | 4,209 | $1,820 | $7.660m |
| 8 | 2 Jun 2009 | -$54k | 2.7 | -0.25% | #17-04 | 4,209 | $1,901 | $8.000m |
| 7 | 2 Apr 2009 | $431k | 1.9 | 5.75% | #17-02 | 1,744 | $2,400 | $4.185m |
| 6 | 4 Feb 2008 | $1,430k | 1.4 | 11.47% | #25-04 | 4,209 | $2,370 | $9.975m |
| 5 | 6 Dec 2007 | $1,988k | 0.9 | 36.7% | #09-03 | 3,466 | $2,250 | $7.799m |
| 4 | 29 Oct 2007 | $2,309k | 0.9 | 39.51% | #18-03 | 3,466 | $2,520 | $8.734m |
| 3 | 26 Sep 2007 | $2,288k | 0.7 | 65.15% | #08-03 | 3,466 | $2,350 | $8.145m |
| 2 | 8 Aug 2007 | $1,756k | 0.9 | 22.63% | #23-04 | 4,209 | $2,400 | $10.102m |
| 1 | 28 Jun 2007 | $1,922k | 0.6 | 51.21% | #20-03 | 3,466 | $2,400 | $8.318m |