The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
Regency Park Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D10 ≫ Regency Park ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 154 |
| Number of unprofitable | 27 |
| Highest Profit | $8,613,000 |
| Longest Held | 27.2 years |
| Highest Annualized | 188.09% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 182 | 22 Oct 2024 | $1,055k | 14.6 | 1.71% | #01-03 | 2,250 | $2,145 | $4.825m |
| 181 | 17 Sep 2024 | $1,550k | 11 | 1.86% | #24-01 | 3,649 | $2,316 | $8.450m |
| 180 | 16 Sep 2024 | $1,400k | 7 | 3.48% | #13-02 | 3,175 | $2,079 | $6.600m |
| 179 | 5 Sep 2024 | $3,237k | 22.1 | 4.61% | #02-02 | 2,250 | $2,278 | $5.125m |
| 178 | 14 Aug 2024 | $4,890k | 23.5 | 4.24% | #04-01 | 3,649 | $2,149 | $7.840m |
| 177 | 29 May 2024 | $3,200k | 22.6 | 4.33% | #03-04 | 2,260 | $2,300 | $5.200m |
| 176 | 15 May 2023 | $1,280k | 5.6 | 5.18% | #04-04 | 2,250 | $2,311 | $5.200m |
| 175 | 6 Mar 2023 | $2,667k | 27.2 | 1.97% | #15-03 | 3,175 | $2,040 | $6.477m |
| 174 | 31 Aug 2022 | $8,613k | 24.3 | 3.95% | #24-03 | 6,415 | $2,200 | $14.113m |
| 173 | 15 Mar 2022 | $430k | 12.1 | 0.9% | #01-03 | 2,250 | $1,858 | $4.180m |
| 172 | 2 Nov 2021 | $4,100k | 22.2 | 3.79% | #02-01 | 3,649 | $2,001 | $7.300m |
| 171 | 19 Oct 2021 | $3,250k | 22.1 | 3.26% | #19-03 | 3,175 | $2,016 | $6.400m |
| 170 | 3 Sep 2021 | $2,730k | 15.7 | 6.11% | #01-02 | 2,250 | $2,000 | $4.500m |
| 169 | 21 Apr 2021 | $800k | 3.4 | 4.16% | #14-02 | 3,175 | $1,921 | $6.100m |
| 168 | 12 Mar 2021 | $3,300k | 14.7 | 4.17% | #11-04 | 3,649 | $2,001 | $7.300m |
| 167 | 5 Mar 2021 | $0k | 9.8 | 0% | #06-01 | 3,649 | $2,001 | $7.300m |
| 166 | 16 Feb 2021 | $2,500k | 14.3 | 3.26% | #19-04 | 3,649 | $1,864 | $6.800m |
| 165 | 15 Oct 2020 | $250k | 6 | 1.03% | #01-04 | 2,250 | $1,867 | $4.200m |
| 164 | 15 Jul 2020 | $400k | 10.6 | 0.61% | #25-04 | 3,649 | $1,768 | $6.450m |
| 163 | 16 Mar 2020 | $3,580k | 15.1 | 5.45% | #12-04 | 3,649 | $1,781 | $6.500m |
| 162 | 23 Sep 2019 | $3,380k | 15 | 5.67% | #11-02 | 3,175 | $1,890 | $6.000m |
| 161 | 12 Jul 2019 | $1,645k | 12.7 | 3.74% | #04-02 | 2,250 | $1,967 | $4.425m |
| 160 | 6 Aug 2018 | $1,100k | 7.1 | 4.05% | #04-04 | 2,260 | $1,982 | $4.480m |
| 159 | 24 May 2018 | $3,150k | 14.9 | 5.72% | #12-03 | 3,175 | $1,764 | $5.600m |
| 158 | 9 Jan 2018 | $2,200k | 8.9 | 6.08% | #09-02 | 3,175 | $1,701 | $5.400m |
| 157 | 10 Nov 2017 | $3,150k | 17 | 4.31% | #13-04 | 3,649 | $1,685 | $6.150m |
| 156 | 10 Nov 2017 | $2,000k | 9 | 5.42% | #14-02 | 3,175 | $1,669 | $5.300m |
| 155 | 2 Nov 2017 | $2,000k | 11.2 | 6.04% | #04-01 | 2,260 | $1,836 | $4.150m |
| 154 | 27 Oct 2017 | $70k | 7.5 | 0.18% | #10-03 | 3,175 | $1,622 | $5.150m |
| 153 | 10 Oct 2017 | $2,470k | 14.2 | 4.83% | #20-02 | 3,175 | $1,597 | $5.070m |
| 152 | 10 Oct 2017 | $2,320k | 12 | 7.76% | #04-04 | 2,250 | $1,742 | $3.920m |
| 151 | 28 Sep 2017 | $1,200k | 8.2 | 3.25% | #13-02 | 3,175 | $1,638 | $5.200m |
| 150 | 27 Sep 2017 | -$530k | 5.2 | -1.53% | #15-04 | 3,649 | $1,740 | $6.350m |
| 149 | 17 Aug 2017 | $2,200k | 11.6 | 4.03% | #14-04 | 3,649 | $1,644 | $6.000m |
| 148 | 5 Apr 2017 | $80k | 6.7 | 0.3% | #04-06 | 2,260 | $1,761 | $3.980m |
| 147 | 11 Nov 2015 | $20k | 8.3 | 0.06% | #02-04 | 2,260 | $1,725 | $3.900m |
| 146 | 21 Sep 2015 | $100k | 7.2 | 0.29% | #13-02 | 3,175 | $1,543 | $4.900m |
| 145 | 2 Jun 2015 | $1,500k | 8.6 | 3.5% | #08-04 | 3,649 | $1,603 | $5.850m |
| 144 | 10 Oct 2014 | $1,835k | 13.9 | 4.58% | #01-04 | 2,250 | $1,756 | $3.950m |
| 143 | 31 Jul 2014 | $600k | 7.5 | 1.42% | #05-01 | 3,649 | $1,644 | $6.000m |
| 142 | 7 Apr 2014 | $50k | 6.8 | 0.13% | #22-03 | 3,175 | $1,764 | $5.600m |
| 141 | 9 Oct 2013 | $1,800k | 7 | 7.58% | #04-03 | 2,250 | $2,000 | $4.500m |
| 140 | 11 Sep 2013 | $2,600k | 4.4 | 11.24% | #24-01 | 3,649 | $1,891 | $6.900m |
| 139 | 4 Mar 2013 | $600k | 5.9 | 1.62% | #18-04 | 3,649 | $1,809 | $6.600m |
| 138 | 22 Nov 2012 | $500k | 3 | 4.2% | #02-06 | 2,260 | $1,902 | $4.300m |
| 137 | 24 Oct 2012 | $928k | 4.8 | 2.91% | #13-01 | 3,649 | $1,981 | $7.228m |
| 136 | 5 Oct 2012 | $500k | 5.3 | 1.46% | #05-01 | 3,649 | $1,864 | $6.800m |
| 135 | 13 Jul 2012 | $2,830k | 6.3 | 8.84% | #15-04 | 3,649 | $1,885 | $6.880m |
| 134 | 21 May 2012 | $1,600k | 2.9 | 9.86% | #22-01 | 3,649 | $1,836 | $6.700m |
| 133 | 13 Apr 2012 | $270k | 2.1 | 3.38% | #02-02 | 2,250 | $1,800 | $4.050m |
| 132 | 30 Mar 2012 | $2,570k | 13 | 5.33% | #05-02 | 3,175 | $1,653 | $5.250m |
| 131 | 9 Mar 2012 | $2,350k | 11.6 | 5.11% | #20-03 | 3,175 | $1,685 | $5.350m |
| 130 | 25 Oct 2011 | $2,500k | 12.3 | 5.05% | #16-03 | 3,175 | $1,732 | $5.500m |
| 129 | 29 Sep 2011 | $1,390k | 4.8 | 5.88% | #11-03 | 3,175 | $1,833 | $5.820m |
| 128 | 29 Aug 2011 | $1,090k | 1.5 | 15.01% | #19-02 | 3,175 | $1,855 | $5.890m |
| 127 | 29 Jun 2011 | $1,460k | 13 | 4.43% | #04-04 | 2,260 | $1,495 | $3.380m |
| 126 | 20 Jun 2011 | $3,100k | 8.2 | 9.93% | #23-02 | 3,175 | $1,811 | $5.750m |
| 125 | 13 May 2011 | $900k | 1.2 | 12.01% | #06-01 | 3,649 | $2,001 | $7.300m |
| 124 | 28 Apr 2011 | $4,500k | 7.8 | 12.94% | #12-01 | 3,649 | $2,014 | $7.350m |
| 123 | 26 Apr 2011 | $1,200k | 4.4 | 5.83% | #19-02 | 3,175 | $1,701 | $5.400m |
| 122 | 24 Mar 2011 | $950k | 1.1 | 17.93% | #07-02 | 3,175 | $1,779 | $5.650m |
| 121 | 3 Mar 2011 | $3,300k | 4 | 7.87% | #24-03 | 6,383 | $1,958 | $12.500m |
| 120 | 28 Jan 2011 | -$85k | 3.4 | -0.43% | #10-03 | 3,175 | $1,800 | $5.715m |
| 119 | 11 Jan 2011 | $1,840k | 1.6 | 27.35% | #22-02 | 3,175 | $1,779 | $5.650m |
| 118 | 27 Oct 2010 | $500k | 3.4 | 2.73% | #10-02 | 3,175 | $1,779 | $5.650m |
| 117 | 27 Sep 2010 | $230k | 0.9 | 7.58% | #02-01 | 2,260 | $1,686 | $3.810m |
| 116 | 24 Aug 2010 | $2,000k | 1.4 | 41.77% | #08-03 | 3,175 | $1,638 | $5.200m |
| 115 | 2 Aug 2010 | $1,750k | 9.9 | 6.19% | #04-06 | 2,260 | $1,725 | $3.900m |
| 114 | 9 Jul 2010 | $2,000k | 3.6 | 9.75% | #19-01 | 3,649 | $1,918 | $7.000m |
| 113 | 14 May 2010 | $3,460k | 8.9 | 8.58% | #15-01 | 3,649 | $1,831 | $6.680m |
| 112 | 29 Apr 2010 | $2,130k | 9 | 6.23% | #10-03 | 3,175 | $1,600 | $5.080m |
| 111 | 20 Apr 2010 | $505k | 0.3 | 56.22% | #03-04 | 2,260 | $1,714 | $3.875m |
| 110 | 14 Apr 2010 | $450k | 1.9 | 6.79% | #03-01 | 2,260 | $1,725 | $3.900m |
| 109 | 16 Mar 2010 | $1,492k | 14.9 | 3.43% | #02-02 | 2,250 | $1,680 | $3.780m |
| 108 | 15 Mar 2010 | $2,910k | 9.4 | 6.68% | #06-01 | 3,649 | $1,754 | $6.400m |
| 107 | 12 Mar 2010 | $800k | 14.1 | 1.3% | #19-02 | 3,175 | $1,512 | $4.800m |
| 106 | 10 Mar 2010 | $800k | 13.6 | 1.35% | #21-03 | 3,175 | $1,512 | $4.800m |
| 105 | 12 Feb 2010 | $1,520k | 0.9 | 52.56% | #07-02 | 3,175 | $1,480 | $4.700m |
| 104 | 27 Jan 2010 | $1,985k | 9.6 | 5.42% | #13-03 | 3,175 | $1,570 | $4.985m |
| 103 | 15 Dec 2009 | $2,050k | 10.3 | 4.1% | #25-04 | 3,649 | $1,658 | $6.050m |
| 102 | 3 Dec 2009 | $2,150k | 3.7 | 15.06% | #06-02 | 3,175 | $1,685 | $5.350m |
| 101 | 26 Nov 2009 | $750k | 0.5 | 41.13% | #23-03 | 3,175 | $1,559 | $4.950m |
| 100 | 20 Nov 2009 | $100k | 2.5 | 0.65% | #06-04 | 3,649 | $1,727 | $6.300m |
| 99 | 20 Nov 2009 | $900k | 3 | 10.01% | #02-01 | 2,260 | $1,584 | $3.580m |
| 98 | 28 Aug 2009 | $2,338k | 3.8 | 14.41% | #07-01 | 3,649 | $1,600 | $5.838m |
| 97 | 14 Aug 2009 | $2,750k | 10.3 | 6.34% | #07-04 | 3,649 | $1,603 | $5.850m |
| 96 | 12 Aug 2009 | $2,750k | 5.4 | 13.97% | #08-01 | 3,649 | $1,494 | $5.450m |
| 95 | 27 Jun 2009 | -$1,500k | 2 | -18.19% | #02-04 | 2,260 | $1,371 | $3.100m |
| 94 | 26 Jun 2009 | $920k | 0.2 | 128.57% | #22-01 | 3,649 | $1,398 | $5.100m |
| 93 | 16 Jun 2009 | $900k | 3.7 | 7.32% | #21-02 | 3,175 | $1,244 | $3.950m |
| 92 | 5 Jun 2009 | $800k | 14.4 | 2.31% | #03-02 | 2,250 | $1,267 | $2.850m |
| 91 | 4 Jun 2009 | $550k | 0.1 | 188.09% | #23-03 | 3,175 | $1,323 | $4.200m |
| 90 | 3 Apr 2009 | $300k | 9.8 | 1.01% | #08-03 | 3,175 | $1,008 | $3.200m |
| 89 | 2 Apr 2009 | -$300k | 11.7 | -0.57% | #24-01 | 3,649 | $1,178 | $4.300m |
| 88 | 9 Mar 2009 | -$1,970k | 1.2 | -32.2% | #07-02 | 3,175 | $1,001 | $3.180m |
| 87 | 26 Feb 2009 | -$1,900k | 1 | -36.39% | #09-02 | 3,175 | $1,008 | $3.200m |
| 86 | 9 Jan 2009 | $690k | 3.8 | 6.31% | #21-03 | 3,175 | $1,036 | $3.290m |
| 85 | 19 Nov 2008 | $780k | 3.6 | 7.77% | #14-02 | 3,175 | $1,039 | $3.300m |
| 84 | 6 Aug 2008 | $610k | 1.6 | 7.27% | #03-01 | 3,649 | $1,617 | $5.900m |
| 83 | 15 Feb 2008 | $1,300k | 1.4 | 22.74% | #09-02 | 3,175 | $1,606 | $5.100m |
| 82 | 10 Dec 2007 | $2,200k | 1.9 | 33.52% | #07-02 | 3,175 | $1,622 | $5.150m |
| 81 | 31 Aug 2007 | $2,250k | 10.4 | 4.38% | #22-02 | 3,175 | $1,968 | $6.250m |
| 80 | 30 Aug 2007 | $510k | 0.3 | 32.06% | #03-04 | 3,649 | $1,781 | $6.500m |
| 79 | 29 Aug 2007 | $2,050k | 0.5 | 90.05% | #21-04 | 3,649 | $2,069 | $7.550m |
| 78 | 17 Aug 2007 | $3,835k | 2.4 | 48.15% | #16-02 | 3,175 | $1,968 | $6.250m |
| 77 | 27 Jul 2007 | $2,060k | 6.5 | 12.44% | #02-04 | 2,260 | $1,716 | $3.880m |
| 76 | 6 Jul 2007 | $2,510k | 3.1 | 31.84% | #01-05 | 2,250 | $1,947 | $4.380m |
| 75 | 5 Jul 2007 | $1,300k | 10.1 | 3.97% | #03-05 | 2,250 | $1,778 | $4.000m |
| 74 | 29 Jun 2007 | $3,020k | 6.2 | 11.18% | #05-01 | 3,649 | $1,727 | $6.300m |
| 73 | 15 Jun 2007 | $2,350k | 6.3 | 9.16% | #22-03 | 3,175 | $1,748 | $5.550m |
| 72 | 28 May 2007 | $2,375k | 11.2 | 4.39% | #06-04 | 3,649 | $1,699 | $6.200m |
| 71 | 14 May 2007 | $2,470k | 7.3 | 7.57% | #03-04 | 3,649 | $1,642 | $5.990m |
| 70 | 4 Apr 2007 | $700k | 0.2 | 105.57% | #18-04 | 3,649 | $1,644 | $6.000m |
| 69 | 16 Mar 2007 | $1,470k | 8 | 7.86% | #01-05 | 2,250 | $1,445 | $3.250m |
| 68 | 4 Mar 2007 | $750k | 0.5 | 76.84% | #01-04 | 2,250 | $1,467 | $3.300m |
| 67 | 1 Mar 2007 | $800k | 9.7 | 1.64% | #21-04 | 3,649 | $1,507 | $5.500m |
| 66 | 15 Feb 2007 | $2,750k | 1.5 | 25.81% | #24-03 | 6,383 | $1,441 | $9.200m |
| 65 | 15 Feb 2007 | $550k | 0.2 | 79.95% | #16-01 | 3,649 | $1,521 | $5.550m |
| 64 | 13 Feb 2007 | $2,000k | 11.3 | 4.17% | #05-01 | 3,649 | $1,480 | $5.400m |
| 63 | 20 Jan 2007 | $620k | 1.3 | 23.15% | #01-02 | 2,250 | $1,200 | $2.700m |
| 62 | 17 Jan 2007 | $1,140k | 0.4 | 81.46% | #03-01 | 3,649 | $1,450 | $5.290m |
| 61 | 20 Dec 2006 | $1,940k | 4.1 | 14.95% | #11-03 | 3,175 | $1,395 | $4.430m |
| 60 | 11 Dec 2006 | $1,950k | 4.7 | 11.03% | #16-01 | 3,649 | $1,370 | $5.000m |
| 59 | 24 Nov 2006 | $1,899k | 1.7 | 45.56% | #04-02 | 3,175 | $1,291 | $4.100m |
| 58 | 24 Nov 2006 | $360k | 10.8 | 1.28% | #01-02 | 2,250 | $1,245 | $2.800m |
| 57 | 20 Nov 2006 | $812k | 0.6 | 43.79% | #19-02 | 3,175 | $1,323 | $4.200m |
| 56 | 10 Nov 2006 | $390k | 0.5 | 26.69% | #20-03 | 3,175 | $1,197 | $3.800m |
| 55 | 7 Nov 2006 | $500k | 7.2 | 2.92% | #02-01 | 2,260 | $1,186 | $2.680m |
| 54 | 3 Nov 2006 | $600k | 11 | 1.38% | #19-04 | 3,649 | $1,178 | $4.300m |
| 53 | 25 Oct 2006 | $1,118k | 0.3 | 177.47% | #08-04 | 3,649 | $1,192 | $4.350m |
| 52 | 11 Oct 2006 | $350k | 7.3 | 1.93% | #04-03 | 2,250 | $1,200 | $2.700m |
| 51 | 19 Sep 2006 | $375k | 6.7 | 2.4% | #01-04 | 2,250 | $1,134 | $2.550m |
| 50 | 8 Sep 2006 | $1,260k | 7.4 | 5.57% | #09-02 | 3,175 | $1,197 | $3.800m |
| 49 | 30 Aug 2006 | $1,043k | 7.4 | 5.07% | #05-02 | 3,175 | $1,071 | $3.400m |
| 48 | 21 Aug 2006 | $400k | 10.6 | 0.96% | #03-01 | 3,649 | $1,137 | $4.150m |
| 47 | 7 Jul 2006 | $520k | 4 | 5.97% | #04-02 | 2,250 | $1,120 | $2.520m |
| 46 | 19 Jun 2006 | $120k | 10.6 | 0.27% | #18-01 | 3,649 | $1,178 | $4.300m |
| 45 | 19 Jun 2006 | $300k | 11.1 | 0.7% | #11-04 | 3,649 | $1,096 | $4.000m |
| 44 | 26 May 2006 | $430k | 7.9 | 1.72% | #20-03 | 3,175 | $1,074 | $3.410m |
| 43 | 7 May 2006 | $880k | 1.4 | 34.83% | #01-01 | 2,260 | $1,119 | $2.530m |
| 42 | 21 Apr 2006 | $500k | 7.8 | 1.72% | #23-04 | 3,649 | $1,096 | $4.000m |
| 41 | 20 Apr 2006 | -$925k | 8.8 | -2.44% | #08-01 | 3,649 | $1,041 | $3.800m |
| 40 | 17 Apr 2006 | $1,138k | 4.6 | 9.3% | #19-02 | 3,175 | $1,067 | $3.388m |
| 39 | 4 Apr 2006 | $750k | 3.3 | 8.3% | #06-02 | 3,175 | $1,008 | $3.200m |
| 38 | 3 Mar 2006 | $680k | 5.1 | 4.63% | #05-03 | 3,175 | $1,033 | $3.280m |
| 37 | 13 Feb 2006 | $1,210k | 2 | 20.69% | #06-04 | 3,649 | $1,041 | $3.800m |
| 36 | 26 Jan 2006 | $450k | 6.1 | 2.07% | #14-04 | 3,649 | $1,041 | $3.800m |
| 35 | 6 Jan 2006 | -$1,250k | 8.9 | -3.91% | #07-02 | 3,175 | $929 | $2.950m |
| 34 | 20 Dec 2005 | -$160k | 5.6 | -0.72% | #16-01 | 3,649 | $1,052 | $3.840m |
| 33 | 8 Dec 2005 | $170k | 2.9 | 3.49% | #01-02 | 2,250 | $787 | $1.770m |
| 32 | 9 Nov 2005 | $450k | 4.8 | 2.92% | #07-01 | 3,649 | $959 | $3.500m |
| 31 | 28 Oct 2005 | -$185k | 10.3 | -0.82% | #01-02 | 2,250 | $925 | $2.080m |
| 30 | 19 Oct 2005 | $250k | 4.5 | 1.92% | #21-02 | 3,175 | $961 | $3.050m |
| 29 | 19 Oct 2005 | $350k | 3.1 | 6.07% | #01-02 | 2,250 | $925 | $2.080m |
| 28 | 3 Aug 2005 | $235k | 3.6 | 2.43% | #15-03 | 3,175 | $882 | $2.800m |
| 27 | 29 Jul 2005 | $195k | 4.2 | 0.74% | #24-03 | 6,383 | $1,010 | $6.450m |
| 26 | 24 May 2005 | $450k | 5 | 2.68% | #17-01 | 3,649 | $1,000 | $3.650m |
| 25 | 11 Apr 2005 | $140k | 0.6 | 10.05% | #14-02 | 3,175 | $794 | $2.520m |
| 24 | 8 Apr 2005 | $188k | 0.5 | 14.27% | #21-01 | 3,649 | $860 | $3.138m |
| 23 | 4 Mar 2005 | -$150k | 5.9 | -0.95% | #21-03 | 3,175 | $819 | $2.600m |
| 22 | 30 Jan 2004 | -$1,685k | 7.5 | -6.48% | #06-04 | 3,649 | $710 | $2.590m |
| 21 | 1 Dec 2003 | -$770k | 7.8 | -4.7% | #01-01 | 2,260 | $752 | $1.700m |
| 20 | 24 Sep 2003 | -$432k | 8.5 | -2.55% | #02-02 | 2,250 | $786 | $1.768m |
| 19 | 14 Apr 2003 | -$1,350k | 6 | -6.59% | #23-02 | 3,175 | $835 | $2.650m |
| 18 | 3 Sep 2002 | $180k | 3.5 | 3.21% | #01-02 | 2,250 | $769 | $1.730m |
| 17 | 27 Feb 2002 | $100k | 2.9 | 1.37% | #12-02 | 3,175 | $813 | $2.580m |
| 16 | 1 Jan 2002 | -$770k | 5.7 | -5.88% | #02-04 | 2,250 | $836 | $1.880m |
| 15 | 6 Nov 2001 | -$580k | 5.7 | -4.36% | #03-04 | 2,260 | $885 | $2.000m |
| 14 | 1 Jun 2001 | -$220k | 2.1 | -3.6% | #11-03 | 3,175 | $875 | $2.780m |
| 13 | 1 May 2001 | -$670k | 5.1 | -3.58% | #05-01 | 3,649 | $899 | $3.280m |
| 12 | 2 Mar 2001 | -$750k | 4.8 | -4.26% | #22-03 | 3,175 | $1,008 | $3.200m |
| 11 | 13 Feb 2001 | -$480k | 5.8 | -3.97% | #02-04 | 2,260 | $805 | $1.820m |
| 10 | 1 Nov 2000 | -$385k | 5 | -3.29% | #01-04 | 2,250 | $940 | $2.115m |
| 9 | 2 Oct 2000 | -$130k | 5.3 | -1% | #03-06 | 2,260 | $1,040 | $2.350m |
| 8 | 7 Sep 1999 | -$800k | 3.3 | -6.53% | #19-03 | 3,175 | $992 | $3.150m |
| 7 | 1 Sep 1999 | $200k | 3.4 | 1.91% | #02-01 | 3,649 | $877 | $3.200m |
| 6 | 16 Mar 1999 | -$880k | 3.9 | -6.52% | #20-04 | 3,649 | $808 | $2.950m |
| 5 | 1 Jul 1998 | -$970k | 2.2 | -12.2% | #20-03 | 3,175 | $938 | $2.980m |
| 4 | 30 Apr 1998 | -$500k | 2.3 | -6.06% | #02-01 | 3,649 | $891 | $3.250m |
| 3 | 27 Feb 1997 | $1,100k | 2.2 | 15.14% | #07-02 | 3,175 | $1,323 | $4.200m |
| 2 | 19 Aug 1996 | $50k | 0.3 | 4.29% | #21-03 | 3,175 | $1,260 | $4.000m |
| 1 | 10 May 1996 | $630k | 0.5 | 39.47% | #12-03 | 3,175 | $1,275 | $4.050m |