The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
Leonie Gardens Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D9 ≫ Leonie Gardens ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 90 |
| Number of unprofitable | 22 |
| Highest Profit | $3,900,000 |
| Longest Held | 24.2 years |
| Highest Annualized | 999% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 113 | 28 Oct 2024 | $1,210k | 17.7 | 2.12% | #19-04 | 2,573 | $1,516 | $3.900m |
| 112 | 17 May 2024 | $1,772k | 24.2 | 3.42% | #07-03 | 1,733 | $1,835 | $3.180m |
| 111 | 28 Feb 2024 | $2,409k | 17.3 | 4.36% | #13-01 | 2,540 | $1,814 | $4.609m |
| 110 | 6 Feb 2024 | $80k | 16.2 | 0.16% | #12-03 | 1,733 | $1,800 | $3.120m |
| 109 | 17 Oct 2023 | $400k | 15.9 | 0.59% | #05-02 | 2,540 | $1,771 | $4.500m |
| 108 | 23 Feb 2023 | $1,480k | 22.9 | 3.28% | #05-04 | 1,733 | $1,633 | $2.830m |
| 107 | 3 Jun 2022 | $850k | 12.1 | 2.48% | #16-03 | 1,733 | $1,904 | $3.300m |
| 106 | 23 Jul 2021 | $3,900k | 14.3 | 3.77% | #22-01 | 4,295 | $2,212 | $9.500m |
| 105 | 17 May 2021 | $2,250k | 14.9 | 5.76% | #05-01 | 2,540 | $1,567 | $3.980m |
| 104 | 26 Mar 2021 | $2,350k | 15.1 | 6.61% | #05-02 | 2,540 | $1,496 | $3.800m |
| 103 | 15 Dec 2020 | -$380k | 13.6 | -0.61% | #22-03 | 3,035 | $1,450 | $4.400m |
| 102 | 4 Aug 2020 | $500k | 11.1 | 0.95% | #22-01 | 4,306 | $1,161 | $5.000m |
| 101 | 4 Aug 2020 | $1,338k | 13.5 | 3.15% | #08-01 | 2,540 | $1,542 | $3.918m |
| 100 | 30 Dec 2019 | $330k | 12.7 | 0.74% | #14-02 | 2,540 | $1,457 | $3.700m |
| 99 | 25 Jul 2019 | $960k | 12.5 | 3.6% | #11-04 | 1,733 | $1,555 | $2.695m |
| 98 | 2 Jul 2019 | $1,828k | 13.9 | 8.53% | #14-03 | 1,733 | $1,551 | $2.688m |
| 97 | 24 May 2019 | -$850k | 11.8 | -1.76% | #17-03 | 2,680 | $1,362 | $3.650m |
| 96 | 22 May 2019 | $50k | 8 | 0.23% | #14-04 | 1,733 | $1,558 | $2.700m |
| 95 | 29 Aug 2017 | $200k | 11.2 | 0.81% | #09-04 | 1,733 | $1,327 | $2.300m |
| 94 | 23 Jun 2017 | -$420k | 7.2 | -2.43% | #15-03 | 1,733 | $1,258 | $2.180m |
| 93 | 11 May 2017 | $1,300k | 10.7 | 5% | #06-02 | 2,540 | $1,260 | $3.200m |
| 92 | 2 Mar 2017 | $480k | 16.5 | 1.9% | #04-03 | 1,733 | $1,039 | $1.800m |
| 91 | 2 Dec 2016 | $0k | 9.7 | 0% | #09-01 | 2,540 | $1,173 | $2.980m |
| 90 | 23 Jun 2015 | $1,350k | 15.4 | 3.78% | #10-02 | 2,540 | $1,220 | $3.100m |
| 89 | 11 Feb 2015 | $1,920k | 8.8 | 6.72% | #20-01 | 3,261 | $1,349 | $4.400m |
| 88 | 12 Dec 2013 | $1,050k | 7.1 | 7.43% | #16-04 | 1,733 | $1,518 | $2.630m |
| 87 | 10 Jul 2012 | -$480k | 4.4 | -2.87% | #12-01 | 2,540 | $1,366 | $3.470m |
| 86 | 10 May 2012 | $1,705k | 6.6 | 17.77% | #14-03 | 1,733 | $1,489 | $2.580m |
| 85 | 6 Jan 2012 | $1,475k | 12.3 | 7.42% | #15-03 | 1,733 | $1,457 | $2.525m |
| 84 | 31 May 2011 | $750k | 14.3 | 2.66% | #04-04 | 1,733 | $1,385 | $2.400m |
| 83 | 26 May 2011 | $1,060k | 4.5 | 11.93% | #14-04 | 1,733 | $1,529 | $2.650m |
| 82 | 27 Apr 2011 | $1,480k | 4.4 | 11.45% | #11-02 | 2,540 | $1,543 | $3.920m |
| 81 | 21 Apr 2011 | $130k | 1.3 | 4.47% | #05-03 | 1,733 | $1,402 | $2.430m |
| 80 | 20 Sep 2010 | $600k | 3.5 | 3.89% | #03-02 | 3,348 | $1,434 | $4.800m |
| 79 | 1 Jul 2010 | $450k | 3.1 | 3.82% | #14-01 | 2,540 | $1,594 | $4.050m |
| 78 | 29 Apr 2010 | $1,238k | 0.9 | 40.49% | #20-01 | 3,261 | $1,380 | $4.500m |
| 77 | 26 Apr 2010 | $1,320k | 14.8 | 4.9% | #15-03 | 1,733 | $1,500 | $2.600m |
| 76 | 12 Apr 2010 | $737k | 3.4 | 11.03% | #16-03 | 1,733 | $1,414 | $2.450m |
| 75 | 9 Apr 2010 | $2,600k | 5.2 | 24.92% | #09-02 | 2,540 | $1,496 | $3.800m |
| 74 | 18 Jan 2010 | $380k | 2.9 | 6.48% | #05-03 | 1,733 | $1,327 | $2.300m |
| 73 | 24 Aug 2009 | $2,200k | 5.2 | 22.9% | #16-02 | 2,540 | $1,319 | $3.350m |
| 72 | 17 Aug 2009 | $1,150k | 3 | 16.93% | #15-02 | 2,540 | $1,220 | $3.100m |
| 71 | 1 Jul 2009 | $1,800k | 3.6 | 15.11% | #22-01 | 4,306 | $1,045 | $4.500m |
| 70 | 18 May 2009 | -$738k | 2.2 | -8.66% | #20-01 | 3,261 | $1,000 | $3.261m |
| 69 | 7 Apr 2009 | -$100k | 2.2 | -2.73% | #16-04 | 1,733 | $923 | $1.600m |
| 68 | 14 Aug 2008 | $1,350k | 2 | 31.95% | #13-02 | 2,540 | $1,272 | $3.230m |
| 67 | 6 Jun 2008 | -$80k | 0.5 | -3.96% | #07-01 | 2,540 | $1,575 | $4.000m |
| 66 | 22 Feb 2008 | $600k | 7.3 | 4.98% | #17-02 | 1,755 | $1,140 | $2.000m |
| 65 | 30 Jan 2008 | $430k | 0.7 | 18.38% | #12-01 | 2,540 | $1,555 | $3.950m |
| 64 | 10 Dec 2007 | $1,690k | 0.9 | 81.93% | #07-01 | 2,540 | $1,606 | $4.080m |
| 63 | 23 Nov 2007 | $1,100k | 0.6 | 67.94% | #05-02 | 2,540 | $1,614 | $4.100m |
| 62 | 14 Nov 2007 | $440k | 0.5 | 40.71% | #12-03 | 1,733 | $1,754 | $3.040m |
| 61 | 12 Nov 2007 | $800k | 0.6 | 46.6% | #13-01 | 2,540 | $1,575 | $4.000m |
| 60 | 6 Aug 2007 | $1,000k | 0.2 | 174.52% | #17-03 | 2,680 | $1,679 | $4.500m |
| 59 | 26 Jun 2007 | $2,430k | 10 | 5.4% | #19-01 | 3,617 | $1,640 | $5.930m |
| 58 | 5 Jun 2007 | $600k | 0.2 | 346.42% | #11-04 | 1,733 | $1,546 | $2.680m |
| 57 | 19 May 2007 | $780k | 0.1 | 399.69% | #22-03 | 3,035 | $1,575 | $4.780m |
| 56 | 10 May 2007 | $520k | 0.1 | 601.6% | #07-01 | 2,540 | $1,366 | $3.470m |
| 55 | 9 May 2007 | $552k | 0.1 | 484.3% | #14-01 | 2,540 | $1,417 | $3.600m |
| 54 | 7 May 2007 | $1,892k | 1.1 | 96.77% | #17-03 | 2,680 | $1,306 | $3.500m |
| 53 | 4 May 2007 | $390k | 0.1 | 669.45% | #14-02 | 2,540 | $1,327 | $3.370m |
| 52 | 16 Apr 2007 | $450k | 0.2 | 92.14% | #05-02 | 2,540 | $1,181 | $3.000m |
| 51 | 12 Apr 2007 | $1,100k | 11.6 | 1.91% | #22-01 | 4,295 | $1,304 | $5.600m |
| 50 | 12 Apr 2007 | $954k | 12.1 | 3.24% | #14-02 | 2,540 | $1,173 | $2.980m |
| 49 | 10 Apr 2007 | -$970k | 0.8 | -30.19% | #07-01 | 2,540 | $1,161 | $2.950m |
| 48 | 9 Apr 2007 | $1,800k | 0.8 | 113.47% | #22-03 | 3,035 | $1,318 | $4.000m |
| 47 | 5 Apr 2007 | $680k | 0.3 | 175.62% | #09-01 | 2,540 | $1,173 | $2.980m |
| 46 | 5 Apr 2007 | $1,090k | 5.8 | 13.78% | #06-04 | 1,733 | $1,200 | $2.080m |
| 45 | 20 Mar 2007 | $1,000k | 10 | 2.77% | #03-02 | 3,348 | $1,255 | $4.200m |
| 44 | 3 Mar 2007 | $230k | 0 | 999% | #05-03 | 1,733 | $1,108 | $1.920m |
| 43 | 18 Feb 2007 | $939k | 0.1 | 848.71% | #20-01 | 3,261 | $1,226 | $3.999m |
| 42 | 14 Feb 2007 | $590k | 0.7 | 80.13% | #05-03 | 1,733 | $975 | $1.690m |
| 41 | 13 Feb 2007 | $830k | 7.2 | 5.51% | #08-01 | 2,540 | $1,016 | $2.580m |
| 40 | 12 Feb 2007 | $715k | 5.5 | 10.08% | #11-04 | 1,733 | $1,001 | $1.735m |
| 39 | 31 Jan 2007 | $315k | 0.1 | 146.37% | #19-04 | 2,573 | $1,046 | $2.690m |
| 38 | 29 Jan 2007 | $130k | 11.3 | 0.71% | #16-04 | 1,733 | $981 | $1.700m |
| 37 | 18 Jan 2007 | $255k | 0.3 | 48.44% | #07-01 | 2,540 | $941 | $2.390m |
| 36 | 17 Jan 2007 | $400k | 0.2 | 150.45% | #05-02 | 2,540 | $1,004 | $2.550m |
| 35 | 9 Jan 2007 | $350k | 7.4 | 3.15% | #12-04 | 1,733 | $981 | $1.700m |
| 34 | 26 Dec 2006 | $892k | 1.6 | 58.87% | #07-04 | 1,733 | $998 | $1.730m |
| 33 | 12 Dec 2006 | $140k | 0.1 | 166.54% | #11-02 | 2,540 | $961 | $2.440m |
| 32 | 11 Dec 2006 | $755k | 0.7 | 78.53% | #19-04 | 2,573 | $923 | $2.375m |
| 31 | 20 Nov 2006 | $570k | 0.3 | 142.67% | #11-02 | 2,540 | $905 | $2.300m |
| 30 | 14 Nov 2006 | $237k | 0.1 | 483.01% | #14-04 | 1,733 | $917 | $1.590m |
| 29 | 11 Nov 2006 | $413k | 11.4 | 2.46% | #16-03 | 1,733 | $988 | $1.713m |
| 28 | 10 Nov 2006 | $930k | 0.9 | 92.75% | #05-02 | 2,540 | $846 | $2.150m |
| 27 | 1 Nov 2006 | $620k | 0.9 | 78.4% | #16-04 | 1,733 | $912 | $1.580m |
| 26 | 5 Oct 2006 | $935k | 1.2 | 60.78% | #07-01 | 2,540 | $840 | $2.135m |
| 25 | 26 Sep 2006 | $250k | 6.9 | 2.7% | #09-04 | 1,733 | $866 | $1.500m |
| 24 | 6 Sep 2006 | $200k | 0.2 | 63.25% | #06-02 | 2,540 | $748 | $1.900m |
| 23 | 1 Sep 2006 | $280k | 6.8 | 2.4% | #13-02 | 2,540 | $740 | $1.880m |
| 22 | 24 Aug 2006 | -$50k | 10.9 | -0.15% | #18-01 | 3,466 | $880 | $3.050m |
| 21 | 15 Jun 2006 | $200k | 7.1 | 1.77% | #06-02 | 2,540 | $669 | $1.700m |
| 20 | 22 May 2006 | $35k | 7.1 | 0.46% | #05-03 | 1,733 | $635 | $1.100m |
| 19 | 11 Apr 2006 | $560k | 3.2 | 11.02% | #22-03 | 3,035 | $646 | $1.960m |
| 18 | 7 Mar 2006 | $350k | 1 | 31.13% | #05-02 | 2,540 | $571 | $1.450m |
| 17 | 28 Feb 2006 | $800k | 4.1 | 9.82% | #03-01 | 3,348 | $747 | $2.500m |
| 16 | 23 Jan 2006 | -$1,280k | 8.6 | -7.24% | #05-01 | 2,540 | $551 | $1.400m |
| 15 | 3 Jan 2006 | $200k | 0.8 | 21.68% | #09-01 | 2,540 | $551 | $1.400m |
| 14 | 22 Dec 2005 | $45k | 0.7 | 7.19% | #16-04 | 1,733 | $554 | $0.960m |
| 13 | 30 Sep 2005 | -$575k | 9.9 | -4.98% | #14-03 | 1,733 | $505 | $0.875m |
| 12 | 6 Sep 2005 | -$990k | 8.4 | -9.48% | #04-04 | 1,733 | $433 | $0.750m |
| 11 | 18 Jul 2005 | -$430k | 10 | -3% | #07-01 | 2,540 | $472 | $1.200m |
| 10 | 10 Aug 2004 | -$1,220k | 8.2 | -7.8% | #13-02 | 2,540 | $504 | $1.280m |
| 9 | 17 Jun 2004 | -$1,350k | 7.3 | -10.14% | #16-02 | 2,540 | $453 | $1.150m |
| 8 | 21 Feb 2003 | -$160k | 3.5 | -2.87% | #14-01 | 2,540 | $579 | $1.470m |
| 7 | 1 Dec 2000 | -$780k | 4.4 | -8.35% | #19-03 | 2,573 | $639 | $1.645m |
| 6 | 15 Aug 2000 | -$382k | 4.5 | -5.58% | #15-04 | 1,733 | $755 | $1.308m |
| 5 | 20 Jan 2000 | -$572k | 3.8 | -9.58% | #08-04 | 1,733 | $714 | $1.238m |
| 4 | 18 Nov 1999 | -$440k | 3 | -9.57% | #09-04 | 1,733 | $721 | $1.250m |
| 3 | 6 Aug 1999 | -$800k | 3.2 | -11.73% | #06-01 | 2,540 | $630 | $1.600m |
| 2 | 2 Aug 1999 | -$400k | 3.3 | -7.63% | #12-04 | 1,733 | $779 | $1.350m |
| 1 | 2 Apr 1997 | $600k | 2.3 | 9.66% | #03-02 | 3,348 | $956 | $3.200m |