The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D10 ≫ Kellock Lodge ≫ Profitability
Number of profitable | 43 |
Number of unprofitable | 14 |
Highest Profit | $1,240,000 |
Longest Held | 26.1 years |
Highest Annualized | 58.62% |
Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
57 | 27 May 2022 | $859k | 26 | 2.12% | #03-03 | 1,206 | $1,695 | $2.044m |
56 | 11 Feb 2022 | $320k | 4.1 | 5.66% | #06-02 | 893 | $1,769 | $1.580m |
55 | 20 Jan 2022 | $990k | 26.1 | 2.5% | #07-03 | 1,216 | $1,714 | $2.085m |
54 | 20 Dec 2021 | $1,240k | 22.6 | 3.8% | #07-01 | 1,216 | $1,792 | $2.180m |
53 | 9 Dec 2021 | $330k | 8.1 | 2.93% | #07-02 | 893 | $1,769 | $1.580m |
52 | 2 Jul 2021 | $700k | 21.4 | 2.93% | #05-02 | 893 | $1,701 | $1.520m |
51 | 15 Apr 2021 | $472k | 5.4 | 7.3% | #03-01 | 893 | $1,659 | $1.482m |
50 | 7 Apr 2021 | $845k | 25.1 | 1.52% | #09-01 | 1,787 | $1,500 | $2.680m |
49 | 30 Mar 2021 | $555k | 11.6 | 4.06% | #07-03 | 893 | $1,679 | $1.500m |
48 | 12 Jan 2021 | $183k | 8 | 1.69% | #04-02 | 893 | $1,643 | $1.468m |
47 | 16 Dec 2020 | $640k | 21.6 | 2.86% | #08-03 | 893 | $1,567 | $1.400m |
46 | 6 Jul 2020 | $210k | 8.1 | 2.04% | #06-03 | 893 | $1,567 | $1.400m |
45 | 19 Aug 2019 | $160k | 5.6 | 2.19% | #08-02 | 893 | $1,578 | $1.410m |
44 | 13 Jul 2018 | $129k | 5.1 | 1.89% | #09-02 | 893 | $1,577 | $1.409m |
43 | 26 Apr 2018 | $270k | 5.8 | 2.82% | #06-03 | 1,216 | $1,496 | $1.820m |
42 | 10 Apr 2018 | $330k | 10.2 | 2.97% | #07-01 | 893 | $1,433 | $1.280m |
41 | 2 Jan 2018 | $490k | 22 | 2.27% | #06-02 | 893 | $1,410 | $1.260m |
40 | 14 Dec 2017 | $479k | 19.8 | 2.5% | #04-03 | 893 | $1,387 | $1.239m |
39 | 1 Aug 2017 | -$60k | 5 | -0.98% | #05-03 | 893 | $1,332 | $1.190m |
38 | 10 May 2016 | $322k | 8.8 | 3.56% | #07-02 | 893 | $1,354 | $1.210m |
37 | 19 Nov 2015 | $680k | 9.3 | 9.06% | #02-02 | 883 | $1,394 | $1.230m |
36 | 6 Nov 2015 | $460k | 11.1 | 5.62% | #03-01 | 893 | $1,131 | $1.010m |
35 | 24 Jan 2014 | $310k | 4.3 | 6.85% | #08-02 | 893 | $1,399 | $1.250m |
34 | 10 Dec 2013 | $521k | 17.9 | 2.15% | #02-01 | 1,206 | $1,359 | $1.639m |
33 | 1 Nov 2013 | $290k | 3.2 | 8.57% | #07-02 | 893 | $1,399 | $1.250m |
32 | 21 Aug 2013 | $440k | 17.5 | 2.29% | #08-01 | 893 | $1,509 | $1.348m |
31 | 28 Jan 2013 | $355k | 3 | 11.27% | #04-02 | 893 | $1,438 | $1.285m |
30 | 6 Aug 2012 | $391k | 16.6 | 2.29% | #05-03 | 893 | $1,399 | $1.250m |
29 | 16 Jul 2012 | $440k | 16.4 | 2.05% | #06-03 | 1,216 | $1,274 | $1.550m |
28 | 13 Jun 2012 | $240k | 4.5 | 5.11% | #06-03 | 893 | $1,332 | $1.190m |
27 | 16 Aug 2010 | $10k | 3.1 | 0.34% | #07-02 | 893 | $1,075 | $0.960m |
26 | 30 Mar 2010 | $103k | 14.3 | 0.82% | #05-02 | 893 | $1,050 | $0.938m |
25 | 18 Jan 2010 | $402k | 6.2 | 9.61% | #04-02 | 893 | $1,041 | $0.930m |
24 | 6 Oct 2009 | $285k | 7.7 | 4.82% | #08-02 | 893 | $1,052 | $0.940m |
23 | 21 Aug 2009 | $205k | 10.3 | 2.4% | #07-03 | 893 | $1,058 | $0.945m |
22 | 26 Jun 2009 | -$90k | 13.2 | -0.73% | #08-02 | 893 | $996 | $0.890m |
21 | 15 May 2008 | $530k | 2.8 | 23.69% | #04-03 | 1,216 | $970 | $1.180m |
20 | 28 Jan 2008 | $96k | 12.1 | 0.88% | #07-01 | 893 | $1,063 | $0.950m |
19 | 7 Dec 2007 | $350k | 1 | 58.62% | #06-03 | 893 | $1,063 | $0.950m |
18 | 20 Jul 2007 | $180k | 11.5 | 1.84% | #07-02 | 893 | $1,063 | $0.950m |
17 | 6 Jul 2007 | $288k | 1.2 | 40.32% | #07-02 | 893 | $994 | $0.888m |
16 | 14 Jun 2007 | $154k | 11.5 | 1.17% | #05-01 | 1,216 | $1,015 | $1.234m |
15 | 8 Dec 2006 | -$380k | 10.5 | -4.56% | #06-03 | 893 | $672 | $0.600m |
14 | 14 Nov 2006 | $50k | 1.5 | 5.48% | #09-03 | 893 | $705 | $0.630m |
13 | 25 Oct 2006 | -$314k | 10.8 | -3.06% | #08-03 | 1,216 | $649 | $0.790m |
12 | 9 May 2006 | -$50k | 4.6 | -1.72% | #07-02 | 893 | $672 | $0.600m |
11 | 25 Jul 2005 | -$446k | 9.6 | -5.32% | #04-03 | 1,216 | $534 | $0.650m |
10 | 27 Apr 2005 | $41k | 1.3 | 6.04% | #09-03 | 893 | $649 | $0.580m |
9 | 9 Apr 2003 | -$410k | 7.2 | -6.39% | #05-03 | 1,238 | $541 | $0.670m |
8 | 1 Feb 2002 | -$294k | 5.8 | -6.17% | #08-02 | 893 | $733 | $0.655m |
7 | 1 Oct 2001 | -$168k | 5.7 | -3.94% | #07-02 | 893 | $728 | $0.650m |
6 | 1 Oct 2000 | -$271k | 4.5 | -5.64% | #06-01 | 1,216 | $744 | $0.905m |
5 | 10 Feb 2000 | -$46k | 4.1 | -1.33% | #05-02 | 893 | $918 | $0.820m |
4 | 1 Jun 1999 | -$155k | 3.4 | -4.39% | #07-01 | 1,216 | $773 | $0.940m |
3 | 3 May 1999 | -$30k | 3.3 | -1.2% | #07-03 | 893 | $828 | $0.740m |
2 | 26 Apr 1999 | -$190k | 2.5 | -8.56% | #08-03 | 893 | $851 | $0.760m |
1 | 15 May 1996 | $103k | 0.3 | 31.81% | #03-03 | 1,227 | $966 | $1.185m |