The key to finding your perfect property should be in your hands. We empower you with valuable insights & tools, and let you be in control of your home search.
Cairnhill Plaza Profitability
All sale transactions profit (or loss)
Condos ≫ D9 ≫ Cairnhill Plaza ≫ Profitability
| Number of profitable | 71 |
| Number of unprofitable | 10 |
| Highest Profit | $3,580,000 |
| Longest Held | 25.8 years |
| Highest Annualized | 999% |
| Date | Profit | Years Held | Annualized | Unit | Area (sqft) | PSF | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81 | 22 Mar 2024 | $2,000k | 11.9 | 2.65% | #18-01 | 3,305 | $2,270 | $7.500m |
| 80 | 25 Aug 2023 | $800k | 4.3 | 4.94% | #08-02 | 2,293 | $1,876 | $4.300m |
| 79 | 9 Mar 2023 | $2,780k | 25.8 | 2.86% | #24-04 | 2,820 | $1,908 | $5.380m |
| 78 | 9 Jun 2022 | $1,980k | 7.1 | 6.1% | #29-06 | 2,852 | $2,026 | $5.780m |
| 77 | 13 Jan 2022 | $1,436k | 4.6 | 7.39% | #05-06 | 2,852 | $1,788 | $5.101m |
| 76 | 26 Aug 2021 | $1,850k | 25.2 | 1.95% | #29-04 | 2,820 | $1,702 | $4.800m |
| 75 | 18 Aug 2021 | $3,350k | 17.2 | 6.41% | #35-03 | 2,820 | $1,808 | $5.100m |
| 74 | 16 Jun 2021 | $1,970k | 25.4 | 2.53% | #25-02 | 2,293 | $1,832 | $4.200m |
| 73 | 16 Nov 2020 | $2,780k | 16.7 | 6.18% | #19-03 | 2,820 | $1,560 | $4.400m |
| 72 | 20 Oct 2020 | $2,350k | 14.5 | 4.18% | #11-01 | 3,305 | $1,589 | $5.250m |
| 71 | 1 Aug 2019 | $2,250k | 22.5 | 2.49% | #20-01 | 3,305 | $1,604 | $5.300m |
| 70 | 26 Jul 2019 | $3,435k | 17.6 | 6.59% | #35-04 | 2,820 | $1,803 | $5.085m |
| 69 | 18 Jul 2019 | -$230k | 11.7 | -0.51% | #18-02 | 2,293 | $1,623 | $3.720m |
| 68 | 2 Jul 2019 | $2,168k | 20.1 | 3.38% | #18-06 | 2,852 | $1,560 | $4.450m |
| 67 | 21 Jun 2019 | $1,500k | 12.3 | 2.95% | #34-06 | 2,852 | $1,753 | $5.000m |
| 66 | 16 May 2019 | -$412k | 7.5 | -1.41% | #30-05 | 2,293 | $1,587 | $3.638m |
| 65 | 3 May 2019 | $1,450k | 22.2 | 2.64% | #06-05 | 2,293 | $1,439 | $3.300m |
| 64 | 10 Jul 2018 | $300k | 4.3 | 1.25% | #15-01 | 3,305 | $1,740 | $5.750m |
| 63 | 26 Apr 2018 | $2,450k | 12.1 | 6.47% | #07-04 | 2,820 | $1,631 | $4.600m |
| 62 | 11 Oct 2017 | $900k | 10.5 | 2.26% | #25-06 | 2,852 | $1,507 | $4.300m |
| 61 | 27 Sep 2017 | $1,520k | 22.5 | 2.88% | #21-02 | 2,293 | $1,404 | $3.220m |
| 60 | 31 Aug 2017 | $2,390k | 12.5 | 7.52% | #09-06 | 2,852 | $1,402 | $4.000m |
| 59 | 5 Apr 2017 | $1,900k | 12 | 6.47% | #10-06 | 2,852 | $1,262 | $3.600m |
| 58 | 9 Sep 2016 | $1,602k | 11 | 6.7% | #24-02 | 2,293 | $1,374 | $3.150m |
| 57 | 24 Jun 2016 | -$80k | 7.8 | -0.23% | #32-01 | 3,305 | $1,362 | $4.500m |
| 56 | 3 Aug 2015 | -$140k | 8.2 | -0.5% | #24-05 | 2,293 | $1,439 | $3.300m |
| 55 | 8 May 2015 | $1,475k | 9.5 | 5.32% | #29-06 | 2,852 | $1,332 | $3.800m |
| 54 | 16 Mar 2015 | $2,075k | 18.2 | 3.07% | #03-01 | 3,305 | $1,483 | $4.900m |
| 53 | 17 Feb 2015 | $568k | 7.8 | 2% | #35-02 | 2,293 | $1,736 | $3.980m |
| 52 | 28 May 2014 | $590k | 5.9 | 2.92% | #16-05 | 2,293 | $1,657 | $3.800m |
| 51 | 5 May 2014 | $2,504k | 15.8 | 7.59% | #04-02 | 2,293 | $1,592 | $3.650m |
| 50 | 21 Oct 2013 | $972k | 6.4 | 3.14% | #05-01 | 3,305 | $1,634 | $5.400m |
| 49 | 13 Aug 2013 | $750k | 3.7 | 5.42% | #28-05 | 2,293 | $1,832 | $4.200m |
| 48 | 31 May 2012 | $1,910k | 5.6 | 12.87% | #15-02 | 2,293 | $1,701 | $3.900m |
| 47 | 7 May 2012 | $3,200k | 7 | 13.33% | #18-01 | 3,305 | $1,664 | $5.500m |
| 46 | 27 Mar 2012 | $2,877k | 7.4 | 17.56% | #13-05 | 2,293 | $1,800 | $4.127m |
| 45 | 5 Dec 2011 | $3,375k | 11.9 | 8.11% | #13-01 | 3,305 | $1,687 | $5.575m |
| 44 | 31 Oct 2011 | $1,632k | 5.1 | 10.75% | #30-05 | 2,293 | $1,766 | $4.050m |
| 43 | 26 Apr 2011 | $250k | 1.3 | 4.51% | #30-03 | 2,820 | $1,649 | $4.650m |
| 42 | 28 Apr 2010 | $2,927k | 6.3 | 21.5% | #30-02 | 2,293 | $1,800 | $4.127m |
| 41 | 14 Apr 2010 | $3,100k | 11 | 11.16% | #02-04 | 2,820 | $1,596 | $4.500m |
| 40 | 25 Jan 2010 | $1,875k | 3.7 | 15.98% | #30-03 | 2,820 | $1,560 | $4.400m |
| 39 | 20 Jan 2010 | $1,850k | 7.8 | 11.12% | #03-05 | 2,293 | $1,439 | $3.300m |
| 38 | 20 Sep 2009 | $1,950k | 4 | 13.61% | #29-01 | 3,305 | $1,468 | $4.850m |
| 37 | 8 Sep 2008 | $3,580k | 10.5 | 15.54% | #32-01 | 3,305 | $1,386 | $4.580m |
| 36 | 15 Aug 2008 | $1,845k | 7.7 | 7.95% | #23-04 | 2,820 | $1,470 | $4.145m |
| 35 | 21 Jul 2008 | $1,860k | 2.7 | 37.52% | #16-05 | 2,293 | $1,400 | $3.210m |
| 34 | 23 May 2007 | $2,220k | 2.2 | 55.79% | #23-05 | 2,293 | $1,570 | $3.600m |
| 33 | 17 May 2007 | $1,828k | 9.9 | 5.52% | #05-01 | 3,305 | $1,340 | $4.428m |
| 32 | 11 May 2007 | $1,126k | 0.1 | 999% | #04-04 | 2,820 | $1,300 | $3.666m |
| 31 | 7 May 2007 | $1,140k | 0.3 | 239.22% | #24-05 | 2,293 | $1,500 | $3.440m |
| 30 | 14 Apr 2007 | $700k | 0.1 | 543.02% | #07-05 | 2,293 | $1,396 | $3.200m |
| 29 | 4 Apr 2007 | $1,600k | 5.5 | 12.24% | #25-06 | 2,852 | $1,192 | $3.400m |
| 28 | 7 Jan 2007 | $1,500k | 7.8 | 8.58% | #26-06 | 2,852 | $1,115 | $3.180m |
| 27 | 30 Dec 2006 | $420k | 0.3 | 56.44% | #09-03 | 2,820 | $1,035 | $2.920m |
| 26 | 28 Dec 2006 | $300k | 0.2 | 86.18% | #09-04 | 2,820 | $975 | $2.750m |
| 25 | 4 Nov 2006 | $732k | 10 | 2.38% | #06-01 | 3,305 | $1,059 | $3.500m |
| 24 | 12 Oct 2006 | -$32k | 10.2 | -0.13% | #30-05 | 2,293 | $1,055 | $2.418m |
| 23 | 5 Sep 2006 | $1,000k | 11.4 | 2.89% | #10-01 | 3,305 | $1,089 | $3.600m |
| 22 | 1 Aug 2006 | $75k | 10.4 | 0.36% | #17-02 | 2,293 | $883 | $2.025m |
| 21 | 14 Jun 2006 | $395k | 7 | 3.37% | #06-02 | 2,293 | $829 | $1.900m |
| 20 | 22 May 2006 | -$100k | 9.2 | -0.42% | #32-06 | 2,852 | $876 | $2.500m |
| 19 | 11 May 2006 | $35k | 5.7 | 0.24% | #21-04 | 2,820 | $894 | $2.520m |
| 18 | 30 Mar 2006 | $400k | 0.7 | 45.81% | #12-05 | 2,293 | $776 | $1.780m |
| 17 | 6 Mar 2006 | $360k | 3.4 | 5.47% | #07-04 | 2,820 | $762 | $2.150m |
| 16 | 6 Mar 2006 | -$520k | 9.5 | -2.96% | #09-02 | 2,293 | $689 | $1.580m |
| 15 | 2 Nov 2005 | -$381k | 6.5 | -3.75% | #16-05 | 2,293 | $589 | $1.350m |
| 14 | 5 Oct 2005 | -$50k | 5.1 | -0.48% | #22-04 | 2,820 | $727 | $2.050m |
| 13 | 27 Sep 2005 | $138k | 0.1 | 403.95% | #24-02 | 2,293 | $675 | $1.548m |
| 12 | 26 Jan 2005 | $190k | 1 | 15.34% | #33-05 | 2,293 | $606 | $1.390m |
| 11 | 16 Aug 2000 | $271k | 1 | 11.74% | #21-04 | 2,820 | $881 | $2.485m |
| 10 | 1 Jan 2000 | $220k | 1.5 | 7.39% | #13-01 | 3,305 | $666 | $2.200m |
| 9 | 18 Nov 1999 | $100k | 3.5 | 1.3% | #26-02 | 2,293 | $981 | $2.250m |
| 8 | 1 Aug 1999 | $364k | 0.2 | 105.05% | #21-04 | 2,820 | $785 | $2.214m |
| 7 | 1 May 1999 | -$475k | 2.3 | -9.57% | #21-04 | 2,820 | $656 | $1.850m |
| 6 | 8 Sep 1997 | $372k | 2.5 | 6.01% | #07-01 | 3,305 | $824 | $2.722m |
| 5 | 11 Aug 1997 | $350k | 1.5 | 13.08% | #03-02 | 2,293 | $929 | $2.130m |
| 4 | 27 Feb 1997 | $130k | 0.9 | 7.68% | #04-05 | 2,293 | $894 | $2.050m |
| 3 | 31 Jan 1997 | $150k | 2.1 | 2.45% | #20-01 | 3,305 | $923 | $3.050m |
| 2 | 16 Sep 1996 | $310k | 1 | 18.15% | #09-02 | 2,293 | $916 | $2.100m |
| 1 | 8 May 1996 | $280k | 0.2 | 111.87% | #26-02 | 2,293 | $938 | $2.150m |